1. Peer Review Certifies Quality and Innovation in Clinical PharmacologyTherapeutics
- Author
-
Andre Terzic and Scott A. Waldman
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Alternative medicine ,MEDLINE ,Bioinformatics ,030226 pharmacology & pharmacy ,Article ,law.invention ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,law ,medicine ,Humans ,Pharmacology (medical) ,Quality (business) ,media_common ,Pharmacology ,Publishing ,Clinical pharmacology ,business.industry ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Pharmacology, Clinical ,Engineering ethics ,Periodicals as Topic ,business ,Quality assurance - Abstract
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (CPT) is an established voice of the discipline, a trusted source of new knowledge showcasing discovery, translation and application of novel therapeutic paradigms to advance the management of patients and populations. Identifying, evaluating, prioritizing and disseminating the best science along the discovery-development-regulatory-utilization continuum are responsibilities shared through peer review. To enhance the uniformity of this essential component of quality assurance and innovation, and maximize the value of the journal and its contents to authors, reviewers, and the readership, we review key concepts concerning peer review as it specifically relates to CPT. Even if individual researchers are prone to falling in love with their own theories, the broader process of peer review and institutionalized skepticism are designed to ensure that, eventually, the best ideas prevail.Chris Mooney
- Published
- 2017