Search

Background: In 2010, a widely used metal-on-metal hip implant design was voluntarily recalled by the manufacturer because of higher than anticipated failure rates at 5 years. Although there was a large published range of revision rates, numerous studies had reported a higher risk of revision for excessive wear and associated adverse tissue reactions when compared with other metal-on-metal total hips. The reasons for this were suggested by some to be related to cup design features., Questions/purposes: From retrievals of ASR metal-on-metal implants and tissue samples obtained at revision surgery, we asked the following questions: (1) What were the common and uncommon surface features? (2) What were the common and uncommon linear and volumetric wear characteristics? (3) Were there common taper corrosion characteristics? (4) What aseptic lymphocytic vasculitis-associated lesion (ALVAL) features were present in the tissues?, Methods: Five hundred fifty-five ASRs, including 23 resurfacings, were studied at one academic research center. Features of wear (eg, light and moderate scratching), damage (eg, deposits, gouges), and bone attachment on the porous coating were semiquantitatively ranked from 0 (none) to 3 (> 75%) based on the amount of a feature in each region of interest by the same experienced observer throughout the study. Visible features of head taper corrosion were ranked (Goldberg score) from 1 (none) to 4 (severe) by the same observer using a previously published scoring method. An experienced tribologist measured component wear depth using a coordinate measuring machine and quantified wear volume using previously validated methods. All available tissues were sampled and examined for features of ALVAL and scored from 0 to 10 by a single observer using a method they previously developed and published. A score from 0 to 4 is considered low, 5 to 8 is considered moderate, and 9 or 10 is considered high with regard to the risk of metal hypersensitivity features in the tissues., Results: The most common bearing surface features were light and moderate scratches and removal or postremoval damage. Discoloration and deposits were commonly observed on femoral heads (55% [305 of 553]) and less commonly on cups (30% [165 of 546]). There was no evidence of impingement or dislocation damage. There was typically a small amount of bone attachment in at least one of eight designated regions of interest (84% [460 of 546]); extensive or no bone attachment was uncommon. Edge wear was highly prevalent. The maximum wear of 469 cups (88%) occurred near the edge, whereas the maximum wear of 508 femoral heads (94%) occurred between the pole and 45° from the pole. The median combined head-cup wear volume was 14 mm (range, 1-636 mm). One hundred sixty-nine pairs (32%) had a combined wear volume of < 10 mm, 42 pairs (8%) had volumetric wear of > 100 mm, and 319 pairs (60%) had wear volume between 10 and 100 mm³. Seventy-four percent of tapers (390 of 530) received a Goldberg score of 4, 22% (116 of 530) a score of 3, < 5% (24 of 530) a score of 2, and none received a score of 1. The most frequent ALVAL score was 5 out of 10 (35 of 144 hips [24%]) and ranged from 2 (one hip) to 10 (nine hips); 92 of 144 (64%) had a moderate score, 17 of 144 (12%) had a high score, and 35 (24%) had a low score., Conclusions: Although edge wear was prevalent, in most cases, this was not associated with high wear. The increased diameter and decreased coverage angle of the ASR design may have resulted in the observed high incidence of edge wear while perhaps decreasing the risk for impingement and dislocation., Clinical Relevance: The role of bearing wear in the revisions of metal-on-metal implants is controversial, because it is known that there is a large range of in vivo wear rates even within the same implant type and that patient variability affects local tissue responses to wear debris. The observations from our study of 555 retrieved ASR implant sets indicate that there was a wide range of wear including a subset with very high wear. The results suggested that the failure of the ASR and ASR XL was multifactorial, and the failure of different subgroups such as those with low wear may be the result of mechanisms other than reaction to wear debris.

Background: There is a general perception that adverse local tissue reactions in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties are caused by wear, but the degree to which this is the case remains controversial., Questions/purposes: To what extent is the magnitude of wear associated with (1) the histological changes; (2) presence of metallosis; and (3) likelihood of pseudotumor formation in the periprosthetic tissues?, Methods: One hundred nineteen metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties and hip resurfacings were selected from a retrieval collection of over 500 implants (collected between 2004 and 2012) based on the availability of periprosthetic tissues collected during revision, clinical data including presence or absence of pseudotumor or metallosis observed intraoperatively, and wear depth measured using a coordinate measurement machine. Histological features of tissues were scored for aseptic lymphocytic vasculitis-associated lesions (ALVAL). Correlation analysis was performed on the three endpoints of interest., Results: With the sample size available, no association was found between wear magnitude and ALVAL score (ρ=-0.092, p=0.423). Median wear depth (ball and cup) was greater in hips with metallosis (137 μm; range, 8-873 μm) than in those without (18 μm; range, 8-174 μm; p<0.0001). With the numbers available, no statistically significant association between wear depth and pseudotumor formation could be identified; median wear depth was 74 μm in hips with pseudotumors and 26 μm in those without (p=0.741)., Conclusions: Wear alone did not explain the histopathological changes in the periprosthetic tissues. A larger sample size and more sensitive outcome variable assessments may have revealed a correlation. However, wear depth has been inconsistently associated with pseudotumor formation, perhaps because some patients with hypersensitivity may develop pseudotumors despite low wear., Clinical Relevance: Metal wear alone may not explain the histological reactions and pseudotumors around metal-on-metal hip implants.

Background: Component design, size, acetabular orientation, patient gender, and activity level have been suggested as factors leading to elevated metal ion concentrations after-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty (MMHRA). The calculation of the contact patch to rim (CPR) distance integrates component size, design, and acetabular orientation and may be a good predictor of elevated metal ion levels., Questions/purposes: We evaluated the effects and the predictive value of the CPR distance on serum cobalt (CoS) and chromium (CrS) ion levels., Methods: We retrospectively studied 182 patients with Conserve Plus MMHRAs at a minimum of 12 months after surgery (median, 57 months; range, 12-165 months). CoS and CrS levels were analyzed using inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Multiple logistic regression was performed to determine which if any of the factors related to serum ion levels., Results: Patients with CPR distances of 10 mm or less had a 37-fold increased risk of having elevated CoS of 7 μg/L or higher. Similarly, these patients had an 11-fold increased risk of having elevated CrS of 7 μg/L or higher. Sex and University of California Los Angeles activity scores did not influence the postoperative CoS and CrS levels. The negative predictive value for CPR distance less than 10 mm was 99.3% for CoS greater than 7 μg/L and 98.0% for CrS greater than 7 μg/L., Conclusions: Our observations suggest the CPR distance would be a useful indicator to determine which patients are at risk for elevated ion levels. Patients with CPR distances greater than 10 mm need not be monitored unless they become symptomatic.

Background: Metal-on-metal and ceramic-on-ceramic bearings were introduced as alternatives to conventional polyethylene in hip arthroplasties to reduce wear. Characterization of wear particles has been particularly challenging due to the low amount and small size of wear particles. Current methods of analysis of such particles have shortcomings, including particle loss, clumping, and inaccurate morphologic and chemical characterization., Questions/purposes: We describe a method to recover and characterize metal and ceramic particles that (1) improves particle purification, separation, and display; (2) allows for precise particle shape characterization; (3) allows accurate chemical identification; and (4) minimizes particle loss., Methods: After enzymatic digestion, a single pass of ultracentrifugation cleaned and deposited particles onto silicon wafers or grids for imaging analysis. During centrifugation, particles were passed through multiple layers of denaturants and a metal-selective high-density layer that minimized protein and nucleic acid contamination. The protocol prevented aggregation, providing well-dispersed particles for chemical and morphologic analysis. We evaluated the efficacy and accuracy of this protocol by recovering gold nanobeads and metal and ceramic particles from joint simulator wear tests., Results: The new protocol recovered particles ranging in size from nanometers to micrometers and enabled accurate morphologic and chemical characterization of individual particles., Conclusion: Both polyethylene and metal wear debris can be simultaneously analyzed from the same sample by combining a silicon wafer display protocol for polyethylene and the metal and ceramics silicon wafer display protocol., Clinical Relevance: Accurate analysis of wear debris is essential in understanding the processes that produce debris and a key step in development of more durable and biocompatible implants.

Background: Numerous studies indicate highly crosslinked polyethylenes reduce the wear debris volume generated by hip arthroplasty acetabular liners. This, in turns, requires new methods to isolate and characterize them., Questions/purposes: We describe a method for extracting polyethylene wear particles from bovine serum typically used in wear tests and for characterizing their size, distribution, and morphology., Methods: Serum proteins were completely digested using an optimized enzymatic digestion method that prevented the loss of the smallest particles and minimized their clumping. Density-gradient ultracentrifugation was designed to remove contaminants and recover the particles without filtration, depositing them directly onto a silicon wafer. This provided uniform distribution of the particles and high contrast against the background, facilitating accurate, automated, morphometric image analysis. The accuracy and precision of the new protocol were assessed by recovering and characterizing particles from wear tests of three types of polyethylene acetabular cups (no crosslinking and 5 Mrads and 7.5 Mrads of gamma irradiation crosslinking)., Results: The new method demonstrated important differences in the particle size distributions and morphologic parameters among the three types of polyethylene that could not be detected using prior isolation methods., Conclusion: The new protocol overcomes a number of limitations, such as loss of nanometer-sized particles and artifactual clumping, among others., Clinical Relevance: The analysis of polyethylene wear particles produced in joint simulator wear tests of prosthetic joints is a key tool to identify the wear mechanisms that produce the particles and predict and evaluate their effects on periprosthetic tissues.

Background: Pseudotumor-like periprosthetic tissue reactions around metal-on-metal (M-M) hip replacements can cause pain and lead to revision surgery. The cause of these reactions is not well understood but could be due to excessive wear, or metal hypersensitivity or an as-yet unknown cause. The tissue features may help distinguish reactions to high wear from those with suspected metal hypersensitivity., Questions/purposes: We therefore examined the synovial lining integrity, inflammatory cell infiltrates, tissue organization, necrosis and metal wear particles of pseudotumor-like tissues from M-M hips revised for suspected high wear related and suspected metal hypersensitivity causes., Methods: Tissue samples from 32 revised hip replacements with pseudotumor-like reactions were studied. A 10-point histological score was used to rank the degree of aseptic lymphocytic vasculitis-associated lesions (ALVAL) by examination of synovial lining integrity, inflammatory cell infiltrates, and tissue organization. Lymphocytes, macrophages, plasma cells, giant cells, necrosis and metal wear particles were semiquantitatively rated. Implant wear was measured with a coordinate measuring machine. The cases were divided into those suspected of having high wear and those suspected of having metal hypersensitivity based on clinical, radiographic and retrieval findings. The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the histological features in these two groups., Results: The tissues from patients revised for suspected high wear had a lower ALVAL score, fewer lymphocytes, but more macrophages and metal particles than those tissues from hips revised for pain and suspected metal hypersensitivity. The highest ALVAL scores occurred in patients who were revised for pain and suspected metal hypersensitivity. Component wear was lower in that group., Conclusions: Pseudotumor-like reactions can be caused by high wear, but may also occur around implants with low wear, likely because of a metal hypersensitivity reaction. Histologic features including synovial integrity, inflammatory cell infiltrates, tissue organization, and metal particles may help differentiate these causes., Clinical Relevance: Painful hips with periprosthetic masses may be caused by high wear, but if this can be ruled out, metal hypersensitivity should be considered.

Selection of the best applicants for orthopaedic residency programs remains a difficult problem. Most quantifiable factors for residency selection evaluate test-taking ability and grades rather than other aspects, such as patient care, professionalism, moral reasoning, and integrity. Four current department members on our resident selection committee ranked four consecutive classes of orthopaedic residents interviewed for residency. We ranked incoming residents in order of best to least qualified and compared those rankings with rank lists by the same faculty on completion of residency. Rankings also were compared with the residents' United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Part I scores, American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) Part I scores, and fourth-year Orthopaedic-in-Training Examination (OITE) scores. We found fair or poor correlations between the residents' initial rankings, rankings on graduation, and their USMLE, ABOS, and OITE scores. The only relatively strong correlation found was between the OITE and ABOS scores. Despite the faculty's consensus regarding selection criteria, interviewers did not agree in their rankings of residents on graduation. Additional work is necessary to refine the inexact yet important science of selecting residency applicants.