Search

Objectives: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate systematically the potential factors that influence failure rates of temporary anchorage devices (TADs) used for orthodontic anchorage. Materials and methods: Data on 492 TADs (miniplates, pre-drilling miniscrews, and self-drilling miniscrews) in 194 patients were collected. The factors related to TAD failure were evaluated using univariate analysis and multivariate forward stepwise logistic regression analysis. Results: There were no significant differences in failure rates among the TADs for the following variables: gender, type of malocclusion, facial divergency, implantation site (buccal, lingual, or crestal/midpalatal), location (anterior or posterior), method of force application (power chain or Ni–Ti coil spring), arch (upper or lower), type of soft tissue (attached gingiva or removable mucosa), and most of the cephalometric measurements that reflect dento-cranio-facial characteristics. An increased failure rate was noted for the self-drilling miniscrew type of TAD, TADs used for tooth uprighting, those inserted on bone with lower density, those associated with local inflammation of the surrounding soft tissue, those loaded within 3 weeks after insertion, and those placed in patients with greater mandibular retrusion. Failure rates of the self-drilling miniscrews installed by an oral surgeon and by an orthodontist did not differ significantly. Conclusions: Inflammation of soft tissue surrounding a TAD and early loading within 3 weeks after insertion were the most significant factors predicting TAD failure. Both orthodontists and oral surgeons who install orthodontic TADs must undergo sufficient training to achieve clinical excellence.

Objectives: Miniscrews and miniplates are increasingly being used for absolute anchorage during orthodontic treatment. However, potential problems of damaging adjacent roots and their consequences during mini-implant placement in the alveolar process have not been clearly described. Materials and methods: Animal experiments were used to evaluate the stability of miniscrews placed with intentional root contact. The root repair was evaluated after screw removal. Seventy-two miniscrews were surgically placed in the mandibular alveolar bone of six adult mongrel dogs with metabolic bone labeling at 3-week intervals. Miniscrews of the experimental group were placed so that they contacted the root of the adjacent teeth, were retained for different time durations, and were then removed. The insertion torque, clinical measurements, removal torque, and histological findings were analyzed. Results: (1) miniscrews contacting the roots showed a significantly higher insertion torque than those without contact; (2) there was a significant difference in the removal torque measurements based on the mobility of miniscrews and the state of root contact; and (3) miniscrews contacting the root were at greater risk of failure. Conclusions: During placement of miniscrews in the aveolar process, increased failure rates were noticed among those contacting adjacent roots. Failed miniscrews appeared to be surrounded with a greater volume of soft tissue. When more inflammation was present, the adjacent roots seemed to experience more resorption. Nevertheless, the created lesion was repaired with a narrow zone of mineralized tissue deposited on the root surface, which was likely cellular cementum, and was mainly filled with alveolar bone, with the periodontal ligament space being maintained.

Objectives: The aim of this retrospective study was to assess systematically the case distribution among three types of mini-implants and to evaluate the clinical factors that influence the failure rates of mini-implants used as an orthodontic anchorage. Material and methods: Data for 359 mini-implants (miniplates, miniscrews, and microscrews) in 129 patients were collected. The factors related to mini-implant failure were evaluated using univariate analysis and multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis. Results: Among these three different types of skeletal anchorage, there was a significant difference between the failure rates of these mini-implants, with the miniscrews and microscrews showing much higher failure rates. There were no significant differences in failure rates among the mini-implants for the following variables: gender, type of malocclusion, local or full-arch treatment, whether on the buccal or lingual side, length of the screw, loading pattern, or the duration of the healing phase. Greater risks for failure were found in younger patients, when an implant was placed for retraction/protraction, when it was placed on the mandibular arch, when it was placed anterior to the second premolars, or when using the miniscrew/microscrew systems. After adjusting for potential confounding effects, only three factors (type of mini-implant, placement on the mandibular arch, and age) were found to be statistically significant in predicting mini-implant failures (P