Search

Objectives: To systematically analyze the accuracy of robotic surgery for dental implant placement. Materials and Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched on October 25, 2023. Model studies or clinical studies reporting the accuracy of robotic surgery for dental implant placement among patients with missing or hopeless teeth were included. Risks of bias in clinical studies were assessed. Meta‐analyses were undertaken. Results: Data from 8 clinical studies reporting on 109 patients and 242 implants and 13 preclinical studies were included. Positional accuracy was measured by comparing the implant plan in presurgery CBCT and the actual implant position in postsurgery CBCT. For clinical studies, the pooled (95% confidence interval) platform deviation, apex deviation, and angular deviation were 0.68 (0.57, 0.79) mm, 0.67 (0.58, 0.75) mm, and 1.69 (1.25, 2.12)°, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the accuracy of implants placed in partially or fully edentulous patients. For model studies, the pooled platform deviation, apex deviation, and angular deviation were 0.72 (0.58, 0.86) mm, 0.90 (0.74, 1.06) mm, and 1.46 (1.22, 1.70)°, respectively. No adverse event was reported. Conclusion: Within the limitation of the present systematic review, robotic surgery for dental implant placement showed suitable implant positional accuracy and had no reported obvious harm. Both robotic systems and clinical studies on robotic surgery for dental implant placement should be further developed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To evaluate the esthetic outcome, as well as clinical, radiographic, and volumetric tissue alterations 1 year after immediate implant placement (IIP) with connective tissue grafting (CTG) versus dual‐zone concept (DZ) at sites with thin labial bone in the esthetic zone. Materials and Methods: This randomized clinical trial included 30 patients treated with IIP simultaneous with either CTG or DZ (n = 15 each). Pink esthetic score (PES) was assessed 6 months after crown placement as the primary outcome. Amount of bone labial to the implant, labio‐palatal ridge reduction, and crestal bone changes were measured via CBCT after 1 year. Volumetric analysis of linear labial soft tissue contour, interdental, and mid‐facial soft tissue level changes, and total volume loss (mm3) were measured after 1 year. Results: Similar PES was observed in the CTG (12.53 ± 1.13) and DZ (12.13 ± 1.55) groups, with no significant difference (p = 0.42). Likewise, there were no statistically significant differences found between the two groups in labio‐palatal bone reduction (mm&%), interdental papillae, and mid‐facial gingival levels (p > 0.05). However, the mean vertical crestal bone changes in the CTG and DZ groups were −1.1 ± 0.6 mm and 0.2 ± 1.0 mm, respectively, with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.0002). Moreover, CTG revealed less linear and total volume (mm3) loss in the labial soft tissue which was statistically significant compared to DZ (p = 0.007). Conclusion: Both groups demonstrated the same PES, nevertheless, volumetric analysis revealed twice total labial volume loss in DZ compared to CTG. It might be concluded that the use of CTG with IIP caused less horizontal reduction in the supra‐implant complex compared to the DZ. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To assess the radiological and histological outcome after horizontal guided bone regeneration (GBR) with deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) alone or in combination with particulate autogenous bone (PAB). Materials and Methods: Eighteen edentulous patients with an alveolar ridge of ≤4 mm were included in this split‐mouth randomized controlled trial. Horizontal GBR with a graft composition of 100% DBBM (100:0) on one side and 90% DBBM and 10% PAB (90:10) on the other side were conducted in all patients. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was obtained preoperatively, immediately postoperative, and after 10 months of healing. Width and volumetric changes in the alveolar process were measured on CBCT. Implants were placed after 10 months of graft healing where biopsies were obtained for histomorphometrical evaluation. Results: The gained widths were 4.9 (±2.4) mm (100:0) and 4.5 (±2.0) mm (90:10) at 3 mm from the top of the crest, and 5.6 (±1.3) mm (100:0) and 4.6 (±2.1) mm (90:10) at 6 mm from the top of the crest. The mean volumetric reductions were 32.8% (±23.8) (100:0) and 38.2% (±23.2) (90:10). Histomorphometry revealed that mean percentages of bone were 50.8% (±10.7) (100:0) and 46.4% (±11.3) (90:10), DBBM were 31.6% (±12.6) (100:0) and 35.4% (±14.8) (90:10), and non‐mineralized tissue were 17.6% (±11.7; 100:0) and 18.2% (±18.2) (90:10). No significant differences were evident between in any evaluated parameters. Conclusions: There were no additional effects of adding PAB to DBBM regarding bone formation, width changes, or volumetric changes after 10 months of graft healing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To compare implant placement accuracy and patient‐centered results between the dynamic computer‐assisted implant surgeries (d‐CAISs) using marker‐based and marker‐free registration methods. Materials and Methods: A double‐armed, single‐blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted, in which 34 patients requiring single implant placement at the esthetic zone were randomly assigned to the marker‐based (n = 17) or marker‐free (n = 17) groups. The marker‐based registration was performed using a splint containing radiopaque markers, while the marker‐free registration used natural teeth. The primary outcome assessed implant positioning accuracy via angular and linear deviations between preoperative and postoperative implant positions in CBCT. Patients were also surveyed about the intraoperative experience and oral health impact profile (OHIP). Results: The global linear deviations at the implant platform (0.82 ± 0.28 and 0.85 ± 0.41 mm) and apex (1.28 ± 0.34 and 0.85 (IQR: 0.64–1.50) mm) for the marker‐based and marker‐free groups respectively showed no significant difference. However, the angular deviation of the marker‐free group (2.77 ± 0.92°) was significantly lower than the marker‐based group (4.28 ± 1.58°). There was no significant difference in the mean postoperative OHIP scores between the two groups (p =.758), with scores of 2.74 ± 1.21 for marker‐based and 2.93 ± 2.18 for marker‐free groups, indicating mild oral health‐related impairment in both. Notably, patients in the marker‐free group showed significantly higher satisfaction (p =.031) with the treatment procedures. Conclusions: D‐CAIS with a marker‐free registration method for single implantation in the anterior maxilla has advantages in improving implant placement accuracy and patients' satisfaction, without generating a significant increase in clinical time and expenses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The radiographic examination of alveolar bone using 3D radiographic examination is essential in dental implant treatment planning. Our study aimed to systematically review and quantitatively analyze the correlation between alveolar bone parameters, specifically bone density and cortical bone thickness, assessed using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and/or multidetector computed tomography (MDCT); and primary implant stability (PIS) determined using implant stability quotient (ISQ), Periotest® value (PTV), and insertion torque value (ITV). Methods: This review was registered in the PROSPERO database (registration number CRD42022307245). An electronic literature search was conducted on the PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases for papers published until February 2022. The Quality Assessment in Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tool was used to assess risk of bias. Meta‐analyses were conducted to calculate the estimated average correlation coefficient based on a multilevel random‐effects model, followed by subgroup analysis. Results: Twenty‐six studies were included in this review, consisting of 17 prospective cohort studies, eight retrospective cohort studies, and one nonrandomized controlled trial. A total of 3109 implants placed in 1171 subjects were analyzed. Twenty‐three studies were evaluated using meta‐analysis. The alveolar bone condition was significantly correlated with ISQ (r = 0.60; p <.001), IT (r = 0.52; p <.001), and PTV (r = −0.42; p <.05). Conclusion: Alveolar bone condition is significantly associated with PIS. Low bone density and thin cortical bone can lead to low PIS; therefore, modification of treatment planning and surgical procedures might be needed to avoid poor osseointegration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study evaluated the accuracy of dental implant placement using the robotic computer‐assisted implant surgery (r‐CAIS) technology in fully edentulous patients. Materials and Methods: Fully edentulous and terminal dentition patients were enrolled for r‐CAIS technology. Based on the cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) examination, a customized positioning marker and a preoperative surgical plan were created before surgery. During the implant surgery, the implant osteotomy and placement were automatically performed using an autonomous robotic surgery system under the surgeon's supervision. A postoperative CBCT scan was used to determine the discrepancies between the planned and placed implants. Results: Ten patients with 59 implants underwent autonomous robotic surgery. No adverse surgical events occurred. The deviations of global coronal, global apical, and angular were 0.67 ± 0.37 mm (95% CI: 0.58–0.77 mm), 0.69 ± 0.37 mm (95% CI: 0.59–0.78 mm), and 1.27° ± 0.59° (95% CI: 1.42°–1.11°), respectively. Conclusions: The autonomous r‐CAIS technology proved an accurate surgical approach for implant placement in fully edentulous patients due to the control of the angular deviation. Autonomous robotic surgery seems promising as an accurate technology for treating fully edentulous patients. However, further trials are required to provide more hard clinical evidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To radiographically evaluate the stability of the bone substitute augmented outside the buccal bony arch contour in the maxillary esthetic zone. Materials and Methods: Patients who missed a single anterior tooth and received simultaneous GBR in implant surgery were included. The contralateral homonymous area of the implant site was horizontally mirrored as the individual bone arch contour. According to the relative position of the postoperative buccal grafts and bone arch contour at the implant shoulder, 62 patients were allocated into the outside‐contour (OC) and inside‐contour (IC) groups. Cone‐beam computed tomography was performed before surgery, after implant insertion, before re‐entry surgery, and at follow‐up. The profilometric changes of the buccal bone plate were analyzed via the bone distance to the mirrored bony contour. Results: At the implant shoulder, the bone distance in the OC group was higher than that in the IC group, with statistically significant differences at re‐entry surgery and follow‐up. However, the bone grafts outside the bone arch contour were reduced into the contour after remodeling and showed more bone resorption than the IC group. At other vertical levels below the implant shoulder, bony grafting of overcontour 1–2 mm range was favorable to regenerate stable bone plates reaching the individual contour at follow‐up. Conclusions: The overaugmented bone outside the buccal bone arch contour tended to remodel into the original contour, which indicates that the anterior bone arch contour is worthy of careful observation for deciding buccolingual implant position and bone augmentation width. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the possible interference of image artifacts (IA) generated by dental implants in the evaluation of furcation involvement (FI) in molars. Methods: Tomographic scans of first molars (1M) were performed in dry skulls in the absence and presence of titanium (TI) and zirconia (ZI) dental implants. FI grades were simulated in the alveoli of the 1Ms. Diagnostic accuracy of FI and level of difficulty were verified. Chi‐squared test and logistic regression analysis were used. Results: There was no difference in the diagnostic accuracy of FI between the arches (p =.117). The highest diagnostic accuracy value for the implant variable was found in the absence of implants (88.3%) and the lowest in the presence of two ZI implants (66.7%). The highest diagnostic accuracy value for FI was observed in grade 0 (G0). There was no significant difference between the arches regarding the evaluators' perception of difficulty (p >.05). Assessments were considered difficult in 12.7% of the TI implants and in 29% of the ZI implants. Regarding the number of dental implants, assessments were considered difficult in 24.4% cases including one implant and 17.4% cases including two implants. The logistic regression model showed a significant p‐value only for one and two ZI implants (p =.0061 and p =.0096, respectively). Conclusion: The presence of dental implants in the region adjacent to the area of investigation of FI decreased the diagnostic accuracy while increasing the perception of difficulty by the examiners, especially in cases with ZI implants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the influence of metal artefact reduction (MAR) in the diagnosis of dental implant contact with the mandibular canal (MC) using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods: Dental implants were installed with surgical guides in the posterior hemiarches of 10 dry human mandibles: 0.5 mm above to the MC cortex (G1/n = 8) and 0.5 mm inside the MC (G2/n = 10). The experimental set‐up was scanned with two CBCT equipment using 85 kV and 90 kV, MAR ON or OFF, and different tube currents (4 mA, 8 mA and 10 mA). Two dentomaxillofacial radiologists (DMFRs) and two dentists (DDS) scored the relation between the dental implant and MC. Descriptive statistics were used to observe the absolute frequency of scores. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were calculated considering the known relation between the dental implant and the MC interior. McNemar's test (α =.05) was applied to compare the diagnostic efficacy of MAR ON versus MAR OFF. Results: Overall specificity was higher than sensitivity for both DDS and DMFR (97% vs. 50% and 92.0% vs. 78.0% respectively). There was a significant effect of MAR (p =.031) for DMFR in the case of contact between the dental implant with the MC interior, in which sensitivity decreased with MAR activation from 90% to 40%. DMFR observers showed a better diagnostic performance compared with the DDS observers (accuracy of 84.0% and 71.0%, respectively). Conclusions: Due to the limited efficacy of MAR, it should not be used when conducting CBCT scans for the evaluation of contact between the implant and the mandibular canal. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of aging on the changes in implant stability over time following implant placement. Materials and methods: A total of 104 patients in four age ranges (group 1: <60 years, group 2: 61–70 years, group 3: 71–80 years, and group 4: >80 years) were included. Bone‐level tapered implants were placed without implementing any bone augmentation procedure. The final torque value displayed on the implant engine during implant insertion was recorded. Cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed immediately after surgery to analyze the bone quality around the implant. Implant stability was measured immediately after surgery and 2, 4, and 8 weeks after surgery. Results: In the CBCT image, higher grayscale values were observed in the order of group 1, group 2, and groups 3/4, with statistical significance (p <.05). There was no significant difference in the insertion torque values between age groups (p ≥.05). Groups 1 and 2 showed lower implant stability values after 2 and 4 weeks compared to immediately and 8 weeks after surgery (p <.05); however, groups 3 and 4 showed no significant difference between the results measured at different timepoints (p ≥.05). Conclusions: Implant treatment in elderly patients is successful showing a settled implant stability over time following implant placement when the implant is appropriately engaged in the alveolar bone in the absence of bone augmentation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To evaluate the associations between the cortical bone‐to‐implant contact (CBIC), bone microstructure derived from cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT), and the primary stability of the implant. Materials and Methods: Twenty‐two patients with 65 implants were enrolled in this study. The peak insertion torque values (ITVs) were measured during implant insertion, and the implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were measured immediately after implant placement and 3 months after surgery. The profiles of the peri‐implant bone structure were outlined using the volumetric reconstruction of the CBCTs and superimposition of the virtual models, and the features of CBIC and bone microstructure parameters were measured. The linear mixed effects model and generalized estimating equation were used to explore the predictors for implant primary stability. Results: The average ITV, baseline, and secondary ISQ values were 31.44 ± 6.54 N·cm, 73.34 ± 7.39, and 80.32 ± 4.58, respectively. Statistically significant correlations were found between ITV and surface area of CBIC (r =.340, p =.006), bone volume fraction (r =.294, p =.017), and bone surface fraction (r = −.278, p =.039). Implants with buccolingual CBIC had a higher ITV than implants without CBIC (p =.016). None of the parameters were associated with baseline and secondary ISQ values in generalized estimating equation analysis (all p >.05). Conclusions: Within the limitations of the study, preoperative CBCT measurements might enable the prediction of ITV and therefore of implant primary stability values. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To investigate the accuracy of a miniaturized dynamic navigation system with intraoral markers and two different workflows for dental implantation and to compare with static computer‐assisted implant surgery (sCAIS) surgery. Materials and Methods: Two operators performed a total of 270 implant insertions in polyurethane mandibular models under simulated clinical conditions. Implants were placed after CBCT‐based virtual planning in three different groups: two workflows utilizing dynamic computer‐assisted implant surgery (dCAIS; DG1: marker in CBCT; DG2: 3D‐printed marker) and the others with sCAIS (TG: template guided). Postoperative surface scans were matched to the planning data and allowed an evaluation of the angular and spatial deviation between the planned and the actually achieved implant position. Descriptive statistics were followed by a Mixed Model Analysis to determine the influence of the operator, the method, and operating area on different accuracy parameters and the random effect of the model number. Results: The mean angular deviation ranged from 2.26° (DG1) to 2.96° (TG). The mean 3D deviation at the implant's tip ranged from 1.08 mm (TG) to 1.51 mm (DG2) and at the implant's base from 0.69 mm (TG) to 1.49 mm (DG2). The operator showed no significant influence on the accuracy. The method showed significant influence on singular parameters and the operating area on all spatial accuracy parameters. Conclusions: Dynamic navigation systems with intraoral markers enable accurate implant positioning, which is comparable to the static‐guided implant surgery. 3D‐printed markers provide less accurate results compared to prefabricated markers, attached before CBCT scan. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The objective of the study was to evaluate the radiographic changes in sinus mucosal thickness (SMT) in patients with mucosal thickening of odontogenic origin after maxillary molar extraction and lateral sinus augmentation with simultaneous surgical drainage and implant placement. Materials and Methods: Forty‐six patients were included in this study. The changes in SMT were evaluated using cone‐beam computed tomography images produced at four time points: before extraction (T0), before surgery (T1), immediately after surgery (T2), and after prosthesis delivery (T3), and statistical differences between time points were analyzed. The changes in SMT and augmented bone height (ABH) regarding the reason of extraction, smoking, ostial patency, and the presence of postoperative sinusitis were also evaluated. Results: Over time points, SMT gradually decreased (T0: 19.44 ± 9.22 mm, T1: 15.10 ± 8.89 mm, T2: 8.42 ± 6.01 mm, and T3: 4.16 ± 4.91 mm) (p <.05). Five out of 6 patients with ostial obstruction at T1 presented ostial patency at T3. Two patients developed postoperative sinusitis but recovered with medication. Ostial patency at T1, SMT at T1, and reason of extraction did not statistically significantly influence SMT at T3. SMT at T1 had no statistically significant impact on ABH change between T2 and T3. Conclusion: Sinus mucosal thickness was gradually reduced by extraction of compromised teeth and drainage during lateral sinus augmentation. The drainage contributed more to the reduction in SMT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Registration of intra‐oral surface scans to cone beam computer tomography (CBCT) is critical in the digital workflow for static computer‐aided implant surgery (sCAIS). This study aimed to assess the impact of CBCT field of view (FoV) on the precision of digital intra‐oral scan registration. Materials and Methods: Cone beam computer tomography data and intra‐oral scans from 20 patients were included. Small FoV CBCT's were created by digitally segmenting a large FoV into three sextants. Virtual implant planning was performed. Digital intra‐oral scans were repeatedly registered onto their corresponding large and small FoV CBCT datasets. The distances and angulations between the matching implant positions of each repeated registration were used to determine the precision of the registration process. Wilcoxon Signed Rank Paired Tests were used to compare the differences between large FoV and small FoV. The threshold for statistical significance was set at p =.05. Results: Differences in 3D implant position based on the registration precision between small FoV and large FoV present at both the implant entry point (0.37 ± 0.25 mm vs 0.35 ± 0.23 mm, p =.482) and implant tip (0.49 ± 0.34 mm vs 0.37 ± 0.24 mm, p <.001). Differences in overall angular precision were observed between small FOV and large FoV (1.43 ± 1.36° vs 0.51 ± 0.38°, p <.001). Conclusion: CBCT with a small FoV is accompanied by greater precision errors in intra‐oral scan registration. However, when sufficient well‐distributed teeth are visible in small FoV CBCT, the precision of digital intra‐oral scan registration appears to be within clinically acceptable limits for sCAIS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To assess, in vitro, variables potentially influencing implant blooming using a human‐like imaging phantom and 3D‐printed mandibles. Material and Methods: Sixty implants were inserted in 3D‐printed mandibles in 26 different configurations in order to examine the impact of implant diameter, presence of a cover screw, implant design/material, implant position, and the presence of additional implants on implant blooming using two cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices (Accuitomo [ACC] and NewTom [NWT]). Two observers measured the amount of implant blooming in both buccolingual and mesiodistal directions. Inter‐rater agreement and descriptive statistics, grouped by implant characteristic and CBCT device, were calculated. Results: Both CBCT devices increased implant diameter (a mean increase of 9.2% and 11.8% for titanium, 20.3% and 24.4% for zirconium, for ACC and NWT, respectively). An increase in implant diameter did not increase the amount of blooming, whereas placing a cover screw did (from 8.0% to 10.9% for ACC, and from 10.0% to 15.6% for NWT). Moreover, implant design, anatomical region, and the presence of another implant also affected the extent of the blooming. Conclusions: Dental implants show a clear diameter increase on CBCT, with the effect being more pronounced for zirconium than for titanium implants. Similar effects are likely to occur in the clinical setting, potentially masking nonosseointegration, reducing the dimensions of peri‐implant defects, and/or causing underestimation of the buccal bone thickness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the impact of reducing the radiographic field of view (FOV) on the trueness and precision of the alignment between cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and intraoral scanning data for implant planning. Materials and Methods: Fifteen participants presenting with one of three clinical scenarios: single tooth loss (ST, n = 5), multiple missing teeth (MT, n = 5) and presence of radiographic artifacts (AR, n = 5) were included. CBCT volumes covering the full arch (FA) were reduced to the quadrant (Q) or the adjacent tooth/teeth (A). Two operators, an expert (exp) in virtual implant planning and an inexperienced clinician, performed multiple superimpositions, with FA‐exp serving as a reference. The deviations were calculated at the implant apex and shoulder levels. Thereafter, linear mixed models were adapted to investigate the influence of FOV on discrepancies. Results: Evaluation of trueness compared to FA‐exp resulted in the largest mean (AR‐A: 0.10 ± 0.33 mm) and single maximum discrepancy (AR‐Q: 1.44 mm) in the presence of artifacts. Furthermore, for the ST group, the largest mean error (−0.06 ± 0.2 mm, shoulder) was calculated with the FA‐FOV, while for MT, with the intermediate volume (−0.07 ± 0.24 mm, Q). In terms of precision, the mean SD intervals were ≤0.25 mm (A‐exp). Precision was influenced by FOV volume (FA < Q < A) but not by operator expertise. Conclusions: For single posterior missing teeth, an extended FOV does not improve registration accuracy. However, in the presence of artifacts or multiple missing posterior teeth, caution is recommended when reducing FOV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To retrospectively evaluate whether repositioning the bone window leads to a better outcome of three‐dimensional sinus augmentation in lateral sinus floor elevation (LSFE) with simultaneous implant placement. Methods: 34 patients with a total of 40 implants (14: test group, 26: control group) receiving LSFE with simultaneous implant placement were included in this retrospective research. CBCT images were taken before surgery, immediately and 6 months after surgery. The two‐dimensional augmentation parameters, including apical bone height (ABH), endo‐sinus bone gain (ESBG), and palatal/buccal bone height (PBH/BBH), and three‐dimensional parameters, including augmentation volume (AV) and palatal/buccal augmentation volume (PAV/BAV), were measured. The lateral defect length (LDL) and lateral window length (LWL) were also measured to evaluate the lateral antrostomy recovery. Results: At the 6‐month follow‐up, the reduction rates at ABH, ESBG, and BBH of the test group (ABH: 10.41% ± 30.30%, ESBG: 2.55% ± 8.91%, BBH: 2.50% ± 8.65%) were significantly lower than those of the control group (ABH: 25.10% ± 22.02%, ESBG: 11.47% ± 9.79%, BBH: 7.10% ± 5.37%; p <.05). In addition, the test group showed better three‐dimensional augmentation stability on the buccal side (BAV reduction: 15.51% ± 10.86% vs. 27.15% ± 12.61%; p <.05). Moreover, the LDL/LWL ratio of the test group was significantly lower than that of the control group (p <.05). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, repositioning of the bone window in LSFE with simultaneous implant placement could contribute to endo‐sinus augmentation stability on the buccal side at the 6‐month follow‐up. Moreover, it would also facilitate recovery of the lateral antrostomy defect. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To validate in vitro the accuracy of a novel method for bone augmentation of horizontal alveolar bone defects with the help of a surgical guide. Material and methods: Six cone‐beam computed tomography scans of patients requiring horizontal bone augmentation were segmented and 3D printed. Two surgeons performed the bone augmentation surgery twice for each case on 3D‐printed models, using either a conventional or guided protocol. Each surgeon virtually planned the desired graft shape beforehand. The resulting grafts were compared linearly and volumetrically to the plan; graft density and surgical time were also analyzed. Results: There was significantly less graft volume outside the planned volume with the guided protocol (36.8% ± 14.1 vs. 19.6% ± 12.3, p <.01). The use of a guide increased graft accuracy at several measurement points, resulting in less overfill when using the guided protocol (1.7 ± 1.7 mm at the most coronal point, 0.2 mm ± 1.4 at 25%, 0.0 mm ± 0.9 at 50%, 0.1 mm ± 1.1 at 75%, and 0.4 mm ± 1.4 apically). Graft thickness was increased 1 mm coronally from the planned graft (2.8 mm ± 2.3 vs. 1.8 mm ± 2.2, p =.04). Surgical time increased significantly when using a guide (a difference of 2 m 26 s). Conclusion: The technique, tested here in vitro, allows surgeons to improve the accuracy of the resulting graft shape, to better compact material in the coronal portion of the graft, and to reduce the amount of graft material placed outside the planned volume. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study aimed to determine whether distally angulating an implant is a successful strategy to avoid the maxillary sinus and the need for bone augmentation, while increasing the anterior‐posterior (A‐P) implant distribution in the edentulous maxilla. Materials and Methods: In 115 patients with edentulous maxillae, virtual implant planning was performed utilizing cone‐beam computer tomographs. Axial (8 mm length) and tilted (12 mm length) dental implants with 30‐degree and 45‐degree angulation were virtually positioned to avoid entering the maxillary sinus, while maximizing A‐P distribution. Measurements were made between the tilted and axial implants to assess the change in A‐P distribution of implants at the implant and abutment levels. Results: Forty‐seven sites (20.4%) were not able to have either treatment modality with insufficient bone for implant placement. Axial implants were placed more distally than 45‐degree and 30‐degree tilted implants in 24% and 42% of sites, respectively. The average change in A‐P spread measured at the implant level, for 30‐ and 45‐degree tilted implants was −0.25 mm (95% CI −0.76, 0.26) and 1.9 mm (95% CI 1.4, 2.3), respectively. When measured from the center of each multi‐unit abutment the average increase in A‐P distances for tilted implants appears larger in the 30‐degree and 45‐degree groups by 0.97 mm and 1.74 mm, respectively compared to measurements at the implant level. Conclusions: Angulating 12 mm implants provides a limited increase in A‐P distribution of implants in edentulous rehabilitation in most situations. In certain patients, the use of 8mm axial implants may provide a greater A‐P spread. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To measure in vivo 3D accuracy of backward‐planned partially guided implant surgery (PGIS) based on dental magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI). Material and Methods: Thirty‐four patients underwent dMRI examinations. Tooth‐supported templates were backward planned using standard dental software, 3D‐printed, and placed intraorally during a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan. Treatment plans were verified for surgical viability in CBCT, and implants were placed with guiding of the pilot drill. High‐precision impressions were taken after healing. The 3D accuracy of 41 implants was evaluated by comparing the virtually planned and definitive implant positions with respect to implant entry point, apex, and axis. Deviations from the dMRI‐based implant plans were compared with the maximum deviations calculated for a typical single implant. Results: Twenty‐eight implants were placed as planned in dMRI. Evaluation of 3D accuracy revealed mean deviations (99% confidence intervals) of 1.7 ± 0.9mm (1.2–2.1mm) / 2.3 ± 1.1mm (1.8–2.9 mm) / 7.1 ± 4.8° (4.6–9.6°) for entry point / apex / axis. The maximum deviations calculated for the typical single implant surpassed the upper bounds of the 99% CIs for the apex and axis, but not for the entry point. In the 13 other implants, dMRI‐based implant plans were optimized after CBCT. Here, deviations between the initial dMRI plan and definitive implant position were only in part higher than in the unaltered group (1.9 ± 1.7 mm [0.5–3.4 mm] / 2.5 ± 1.5 mm [1.2–3.8 mm] / 6.8 ± 3.8° [3.6–10.1°] for entry point / apex / axis). Conclusions: The 3D accuracy of dMRI‐based PGIS was lower than that previously reported for CBCT‐based PGIS. Nonetheless, the values seem promising to facilitate backward planning without ionizing radiation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare crestal bone loss (CBL) and buccal bone thickness (BBT) around triangular cross‐section neck (TN) to round neck (RN) implants retaining mandibular overdentures one year after loading, using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Material and Methods: Twenty edentulous patients receiving 40 implants with similar diameters were randomly assigned to the RN and TN groups. Clinical buccal bone thickness (CBBT) around the implants was measured with a caliper at baseline. A resonance frequency analyzer was used to measure the implant stability quotient (ISQ) at the baseline and two months after insertion. Pocket probing depths (PPD), plaque index (PI), and gingival index (GI) were also recorded at postoperative months 2, 6, and 12. CBCT was used to evaluate proximal CBL and BBT at three levels (0, −2, and −4 mm) one year after loading. Results: No implant loss was observed during the follow‐up period. No significant differences in CBBT, ISQ values, and scores for PPD, PI, and GI between the two groups were observed at any time (p >.05). BBT was also comparable one year after loading (p >.05). The mean ± SD proximal CBL one year after loading was 0.58 ± 0.36 mm for TN and 0.91 ± 0.59 mm for RN (p <.01). Conclusions: This study found better crestal bone preservation in the implants with the novel neck design than conventional neck design in the anterior mandible after a follow‐up of one year. However, it may not be clinically noticeable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to explore the feasibility of ultrasonography (US) for clinical imaging of peri‐implant tissues. Material and Methods: Patients with ≥1 implant, a cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan, an US scan, and clinical photographs taken during the surgery were included. The crestal bone thickness (CBT) and facial bone level (FBL) were measured on both US and CBCT modalities, and direct FBL measurements were also made on clinical images. US measurements were compared with CBCT and direct readings. Results: A total of eight implants from four patients were included. For FBL measurements, US and direct (r2 = 0.95) as well as US and CBCT (r2 = 0.85) were highly correlated, whereas CBCT correlated satisfactorily with the direct reading (r2 = 0.75). In one implant without facial bone, CBCT was not able to measure CBT and FBL accurately. The estimated bias for CBT readings was 0.17 ± 0.23 mm (p =.10) between US and CBCT. US blood flow imaging was successfully recorded and showed a wide dynamic range among patients with different degrees of clinical inflammation. Conclusion: US is a feasible method to evaluate peri‐implant facial crestal bone dimensions. Additional US features, for example, functional blood flow imaging, may be useful to estimate the extent and severity of inflammation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]