Search

Background: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy has revolutionized the management of various ocular conditions, including diabetic macular edema (DME), retinal vein occlusion (RVO)-related macular edema (ME), and neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). However, there remains a need to systematically assess its effectiveness across these distinct conditions. Methodology: A systematic review was conducted to identify studies evaluating the efficacy of anti-VEGF therapy in improving ocular outcomes in patients with DME, RVO-related ME, and nAMD. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant articles published up to 2024. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were critically appraised, and data on the proportion of patients gaining ≥ 15 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), mean change in BCVA (ETDRS letters), and reduction in central macular thickness (CMT) (μm) were extracted and synthesized. Results: The systematic review identified 18 studies comprising randomized controlled trials, prospective studies, retrospective analyses, and observational studies. Anti-VEGF therapy demonstrated efficacy across all three conditions, with varying proportions of patients experiencing improvements in BCVA and reductions in CMT. Notably, the proportion of patients gaining ≥ 15 ETDRS letters ranged from 18.1% to 44.8% in DME, while mean changes in BCVA ranged from +4.2 letters to +21.4 letters in RVO-related ME and nAMD. Reductions in CMT ranged from 183.1 μm to 294 μm in DME and RVO-related ME. Conclusion: Anti-VEGF therapy represents a cornerstone in the management of DME, RVO-related ME, and nAMD, with significant improvements observed in BCVA and reductions in CMT across diverse patient populations. While our findings support the effectiveness of anti-VEGF therapy in improving ocular outcomes, further research is warranted to compare its efficacy with alternative treatment modalities and to elucidate its long-term safety profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Debdulal Chakraborty,1 Subhendu Boral,1 Tushar Kanti Sinha,1 Arnab Das,1 Angshuman Mukherjee,1 Saptorshi Majumdar,1 Ranabir Bhattacharya,2 Ritobroto Maitra3 1Department of Vitreoretinal Services, Disha Eye Hospitals, Kolkata, West Bengal, India; 2Department of MIS, Disha Eye Hospitals, Kolkata, West Bengal, India; 3Radical Health Tech, New Delhi, IndiaCorrespondence: Debdulal Chakraborty, Department of Vitreoretinal services; Disha Eye Hospitals, Kolkata, West Bengal, India, Tel +91 33 66360000, Email devdc@rediffmail.comPurpose: This study investigates the efficacy of transitioning patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) from aflibercept (T1) to biosimilar ranibizumab (T2), an approach not previously documented in literature.Methods: In this multicenter observational study, patients over 50 years of age with nAMD were shifted from intravitreal aflibercept (IVI AFL) to biosimilar ranibizumab (B-RBZ) due to financial constraints. This study employed standardized ophthalmological methods to assess visual acuity (VA), central macular thickness (CMT), and subretinal and intraretinal fluid. Statistical analyses included paired t-tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and linear regression.Results: A total of 29 eyes (12 males and 17 females) were analyzed. Mean age was 72.55 ± 6.43 years. VA improved significantly during T1, with a mean increase from 55.0 ± 10.2 to 70.0 ± 8.5 ETDRS letters at the switch time point (p < 0.01), then a slight decrease to 62.3 ± 8.9 at 12 months (p < 0.05) was noted during T2. The mean CMT decreased notably from 400 ± 50 to 290 ± 45 μm at the switch. The final CMT at 12 months after switching to B-RBZ was 280 ± 40 μm (p < 0.01). There was a significant decrease in the retinal and intra retinal fluid during T1, followed by a gradual increase during T2. A significant correlation (p < 0.05) was noted between the presence of intraretinal fluid and increased injection frequency of B-RBZ.Conclusion: The switch from IVI AFL to IVI B-RBZ in patients with nAMD demonstrated efficacy in maintaining the VA and macular anatomy, with some challenges in fluid management.Keywords: neovascular AMD, aflibercept, biosimilar ranibizumab, subretinal fluid, intraretinal fluid

Bhim Bahadur Rai,1,2 Deepa Rai,3 Ted Maddess1 1John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia; 2Department of Ophthalmology, JDW National Referral Hospital, Thimphu, Bhutan; 3Warrigal Aged Care Facility, Calwell, ACT, AustraliaCorrespondence: Bhim Bahadur Rai, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Building 131, Garran Road, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia, Tel +61 2 61259253, Email bhim.rai@anu.edu.auPurpose: Ocular vascular diseases are common causes of visual impairment and blindness, for which anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) is the first-line therapy. Current study describes the profile of patients receiving intravitreal anti-VEGF injections (IVI), and gender variation in Bhutan. The study was designed to inform national health policy.Study Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study.Methods: We reviewed the surgical registers of the vitreoretinal (VR) units across Bhutan over three years. Patient demography, clinical findings, diagnostic tests performed, and diagnoses or indications for IVI were logged. A descriptive analysis was performed.Results: Despite limited availability of anti-VEGF, a total of 381 patients received IVI in operating theatres as mandated by the national guidelines. The majority of patients were males (230, 60.4%, p = 0.004). The mean age was 65.2 ± 13.5 years (range 13 years to 90 years), and a median of 69 years. The majority of the treated eyes (117, 30.7%) had BCVA < 3/60 to light perception (PL), and another 51 eyes (13.4%) had < 6/60 to 3/60. The most common indication for IVI was neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) (168 cases, 42.2%), followed by retinal vein occlusion (RVO) (132 cases, 34.6%), diabetic macular oedema (DMO) and retinopathy (DR) (50 cases, 13.1%), and myopic choroidal neovascular membrane (11 cases, 0.03%).Conclusion: Limited human resources for managing VR diseases in Bhutan are compounded by economic and geographic challenges. With increasing VR diseases such as nAMD and myopia and complications of systemic diseases such as DR, DMO and RVO, there is a need to improve VR services. Currently, anti-VEGF is procured only for a pooled patients requiring IVI, and patients are lost due to longer waiting periods. Bhutan needs to assess if females are reporting less or are not receiving treatment due to cultural barriers and social stigma.Keywords: anti-VEGF, Bhutan retinal diseases, diabetic macular oedema, intravitreal injection, neovascular AMD, retinal vein occlusion

Colin S Tan,1,2 Wei Kiong Ngo,1,2 Isaac W Chay,1,2 Dominic S Ting,1,2 SriniVas R Sadda3 1National Healthcare Group Eye Institute, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; 2Fundus Image Reading Centre, National Healthcare Group Eye Institute, Singapore; 3Doheny Image Reading Center, Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USACorrespondence: SriniVas R Sadda, Doheny Image Reading Center, Doheny Eye Institute, 3623, 1450 San Pablo Street, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA, Email sadda@usc.eduAbstract: Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is a common world-wide cause of visual loss. Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents are an effective means to treat nAMD and reduce its impact on vision compared to either sham treatment or photodynamic therapy. Currently, the approved anti-VEGF drugs include ranibizumab, aflibercept and brolucizumab. In addition, bevacizumab, used as an off-label drug, and has been shown to be effective in treating nAMD. While anti-VEGF agents are effective, its limitations include the requirement for frequent, often monthly injections, and the need for long-term treatment of nAMD. These present significant burdens on the healthcare system and on the patients. In addition, reviews of patients with nAMD treated with anti-VEGF have reported deterioration of vision over time with progression of geographic atrophy. These limitations are partly addressed by exploring different treatment regimens that reduce the frequency of treatments. Newer anti-VEGF drugs have been shown in Phase III clinical trials to have injection intervals as long as 12 or even 16 weeks for a proportion of patients. There is research on newer drugs that affect other pathways, such as the angiopoietin pathway, which may impact nAMD by extending the treatment interval and reducing the burden of treatment. Other measures include the use of sustained-release implants that release the drug regularly over a period of time, and can be refilled periodically, as well as hydrogel platforms that serve to release the drug. The use of biosimilars will also serve to reduce the cost of treatment for nAMD. A new frontier of gene therapy, primarily targeting genes involved in the transduction of retinal cells to produce anti-VEGF proteins intraocularly, also opens a new avenue of therapeutic approaches that can be used for treatment. This review paper will discuss both current treatment options and the newer treatments under development.Keywords: neovascular AMD, anti-VEGF, retina, gene therapy

Marion Schroeder,1 Lena Rung,2 Monica Lövestam-Adrian1 1Division of Ophthalmology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, 2Department of Ophthalmology, Helsingborg Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden Background: Although ranibizumab has been used for the treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) since 2007, real-world studies still report undertreatment resulting in a less favorable visual outcome. In this study, two different time cohorts of patients treated with ranibizumab for wet AMD in routine care were analyzed to observe whether there was a change over time regarding visual outcome, injection frequency, and quality of life (QoL). Methods: We compared patients with treatment-naïve wet AMD in two observational follow-up cohorts 2007–2010 (n=50 patients) and 2009–2013 (n=26). After a loading dose of three intravitreal ranibizumab injections, the patients were treated under the pro re nata regimen. Visual acuity (VA) was examined by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts. The National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire 25 was answered by patients at baseline and at 37±7 months (cohort 1) and at 45±4 months (cohort 2). Results: At baseline, the cohorts were homogeneous considering mean age (76±7 vs 75±8 years), mean VA (53±14 vs 52±15 ETDRS letters), and mean self-reported symptom duration (14±11 vs 13±11 weeks). Mean VA decreased in both cohorts over time, from 53±14 to 45±24 letters (P=0.011) and from 52±15 to 46±22 letters (P=0.175), respectively. The patients received a mean of 8±5 and 9±7 injections, respectively. The mean composite score change from baseline to follow-up decreased in cohort 1 from 64±21 to 59±25 scores (P=0.04) but increased in cohort 2 from 64±28 to 67±23 scores (P=0.38). Conclusion: We could not demonstrate any improvement in the number of injections in two different time cohorts of patients treated with ranibizumab for wet AMD in a Swedish county. Visual outcomes decreased after 3 years of follow-up, but QoL scores were divergent. Keywords: neovascular AMD, anti-VEGF, NEI VFQ-25, clinical care

Purpose: To determine the effect of ranibizumab on visual acuity (VA) following a 3-year treatment period for patients diagnosed with wet age-related macular degeneration. To establish whether baseline VA and injection frequency influence visual outcomes. Patients and methods: Retrospective review of 70 patients (76 eyes) treated with 0.5 mg intravitreal ranibizumab for 3 consecutive months, and pro re nata thereafter (three + pro re nata protocol), over a 3-year period. VA was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts at baseline, 12, 24, and 36 months. The number of injections administered at the end of years 1, 2, and 3 were also recorded. Eyes were stratified according to baseline VA, as well as the number of injections administered at the end of year 1. Linear regression analysis determined the relationship between VA and both baseline VA and injection frequency. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: At 36 months, VA improved by a mean of 5.3 ETDRS letters (P=0.002), with 29% of eyes (n=22) demonstrating a clinically significant improvement in VA (gain of ≥15 ETDRS letters). Improvements in VA from baseline to 36 months were inversely proportional to the baseline VA (R=0.414, P=<0.001). A positive correlation was observed between injection frequency and change in VA from baseline to 36 months (R=0.244, P=0.036). Conclusion: Mean improvement in VA is inversely proportional to baseline VA, and directly proportional to injection frequency. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Contemporary management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) has evolved significantly over the last few years. The goal of treatment is shifting from merely salvaging vision to maintaining a high quality of life. There have been significant breakthroughs in the identification of viable drug targets and gene therapies. Imaging tools with near-histological precision have enhanced our knowledge about pathophysiological mechanisms that play a role in vision loss due to AMD. Visual, social, and vocational rehabilitation are all important treatment goals. In this review, evidence from landmark clinical trials is summarized to elucidate the optimum modern-day management of neovascular AMD. Therapeutic strategies currently under development, such as gene therapy and personalized medicine, are also described. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]