Search

Background & Aims: Nutrition may be important for recovery from critical illness. Gastrointestinal dysfunction is a key barrier to nutrition delivery in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and metabolic rate is elevated exacerbating nutritional deficits. Whether these factors persist following ICU discharge is unknown. We assessed whether delayed gastric emptying (GE) and impaired glucose absorption persist post-ICU discharge., Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in mechanically ventilated adults at 3 time-points: in ICU (V1); on the post-ICU ward (V2); and 3-months after ICU discharge (V3); and compared to age-matched healthy volunteers. On each visit, all participants received a test-meal containing 100 ml of 1 kcal/ml liquid nutrient, labelled with 0.1 g 13 C-octanoic acid and 3 g 3-O-Methyl-glucose (3-OMG), and breath and blood samples were collected over 240min to quantify GE (gastric emptying coefficient (GEC)), and glucose absorption (3-OMG concentration; area under the curve (AUC)). Data are mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) and differences shown with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI)., Results: Twenty-six critically ill patients completed V1 (M:F 20:6; 62.0 ± 2.9 y; BMI 29.8 ± 1.2 kg/m 2 ; APACHE II 19.7 ± 1.9), 15 completed V2 and eight completed V3; and were compared to 10 healthy volunteers (M:F 6:4; 60.5 ± 7.5 y; BMI 26.0 ± 1.0 kg/m 2 ). GE was significantly slower on V1 compared to health (GEC difference: -0.96 (95%CI -1.61, -0.31); and compared to V2 (-0.73 (-1.16, -0.31) and V3 (-1.03 (-1.47, -0.59). GE at V2 and V3 were not different to that in health (V2: -0.23 (-0.61, 0.14); V3: 0.10 (-0.27, 0.46)). GEC: V1: 2.64 ± 0.19; V2: 3.37 ± 0.12; V3: 3.67 ± 0.10; health: 3.60 ± 0.13. Glucose absorption (3-OMG AUC 0-240 ) was impaired on V1 compared to V2 (-37.9 (-64.2, -11.6)), and faster on V3 than in health (21.8 (0.14, 43.4) but absorption at V2 and V3 did not differ from health. Intestinal glucose absorption: V1: 63.8 ± 10.4; V2: 101.7 ± 7.0; V3: 111.9 ± 9.7; health: 90.7 ± 3.8., Conclusion: This study suggests that delayed GE and impaired intestinal glucose absorption recovers rapidly post-ICU. This requires further confirmation in a larger population. The REINSTATE trial was prospectively registered at www.anzctr.org.au., Trial Id: ACTRN12618000370202., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest All authors report no conflicts to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Oral intake is diminished immediately after ICU discharge, yet factors affecting nutritional intake after hospital discharge have not been evaluated. The aim of this study was to evaluate dietary intake and factors which may influence intake - appetite and gastric emptying - 3-months after ICU discharge., Methods: Inception cohort study with ICU survivors compared to healthy subjects. Following an overnight fast, all participants consumed a standardized carbohydrate drink, containing 13 C-octanoic acid, to measure gastric emptying. Dietary intake was assessed by recall of the preceding day and a standard weighed buffet meal 4-h post-drink. Appetite was assessed pre-drink (fasting) and pre- and post-buffet using visual analogue scales., Results: Fifty-one ICU survivors (82% male; 70 ± 9 y; BMI 28 ± 6 kg/m 2 ) and 25 healthy subjects (60% male; 67 ± 12 y; BMI 27 ± 4 kg/m 2 ) were evaluated. From the 24-h recall ICU survivors consumed less calories (ICU 1876 (708) vs. healthy subjects 2291 (834) kcal; p = 0.025) with no difference in macronutrient intake, however reported a lower preference for fat (p < 0.001). Calorie and macronutrient intake from the weighed buffet was similar between groups: calories (ICU: 658 (301) vs. healthy subjects: 736 (325) kcal; p = 0.149); protein (ICU: 37 (19) vs. healthy subjects: 40 (17) g; p = 0.275); fat (ICU: 23 (12) vs healthy subjects: 26 (13) g; p = 0.261); and carbohydrates (ICU: 69 (35) vs. healthy subjects: 79 (42) g; p = 0.141). ICU survivors reported feeling less full regardless of time-point (p = 0.041). There was no difference in the rate of gastric emptying between the two groups (p = 0.216)., Conclusions: ICU survivors reported less preference for fat and less calorie consumption than healthy subjects. However, intake of calories and macronutrients at a weighed meal was similar in the two groups, as was the rate of gastric emptying. ICU survivors reported being less full after the test meal, suggesting factors other than appetite may influence intake., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Isotope breath tests are increasingly used to evaluate the effects of prokinetic drugs on gastric emptying. The aim was to assess intrasubject variability in gastric emptying, when using an isotope breath test in the critically ill., Methods: A retrospective analysis of data was undertaken in 12 patients who had gastric emptying measurements on consecutive days using a (13)C-octanoic acid breath test. The gastric emptying coefficient--GEC (a global index for the gastric emptying rate), and the t(50) (calculated time for 50% of meal to empty) were calculated, together with the coefficient of variability for these parameters. Data are mean (SD)., Results: Neither GEC (day 1: 3.3 (0.8) vs. day 2: 3.1 (0.6); P = 0.31) nor t(50) (day 1: 127 (43) min vs. day 2: 141 (48) min; P = 0.46) were significantly different between the two days. Intrasubject variability was less for GEC (15.6%) than for t(50) (31.8%)., Conclusion: There is only modest intrasubject variability in GEC measurements using the (13)C-octanoic acid breath test in critically ill patients. As such, it may be an acceptable measurement tool to assess the effects of prokinetic drugs in this group., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.)