Search

Objective: To introduce New2Neuropsychology (N2N), an organization that seeks to increase recruitment of historically underrepresented minoritized (URM) students, and to examine preliminary data on N2N's impact and effectiveness in increasing knowledge about neuropsychology for URM students., Method: This paper reviews relevant literature on factors informing the development of N2N. We also present descriptive data on N2N's impact to date, and results of pre- and post- surveys for presentations about neuropsychology delivered to 90 college students (mean age = 24.23, 64.4% juniors or seniors) between November 2021 - March 2023., Results: N2N has reached >500 students in events across 27 schools and, with the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology, disseminated $84,000 in scholarships to URM students. N2N presentation attendees reported increased understanding of neuropsychology and the training pathway ( p s < .001, Cohen's d s = 0.94 - 1.73) and increased confidence in their ability to become neuropsychologists (p < . 001, d  = 0.41). There were no overall pre-post differences for interest in pursuing a career in neuropsychology ( p > .05); however, a subset of students who reported low interest at baseline ( n =  57) reported a statistically significant increase in their interest post-presentation ( p < .01, d  = 0.36)., Conclusions: To date, N2N has progressed toward its goal, showing preliminary success increasing knowledge about neuropsychology for URM students. With continued development and support, N2N seeks to transform the pathway to neuropsychology for URM students, expanding accessibility of N2N resources across diverse groups and connecting URM students to neuropsychology research and clinical experiences.

Objective: We report a neuropsychological evaluation for a 39-year-old, right-handed, white female who 8 years ago developed delayed post-hypoxic leukoencephalopathy (DPHL), a rare demyelinating syndrome, two-weeks following an anoxic brain injury due to an overdose from benzodiazepines. Methods: An extensive record review documenting her medical timeline and treatment over the last 8 years was conducted using the available EMR system, which also included both EEG and neuroimaging data. Eight years post injury, a comprehensive neuropsychological battery was administered with corrected normative data for age, race, education, and other demographic factors when available. Collected data was compared with other case reports of DPHL. Results: The neuropsychological profile indicated difficulties across multiple cognitive domains that appeared driven by executive dysfunction, likely related to fronto-subcorto-striatal dysfunction. Conclusion: As a rare disease, the process by which DPHL occurs is not fully understood. Our results revealed similar findings in the literature for learning and memory, attention, processing speed, and executive functions. This is discussed in the context of available neuroimaging while highlighting the value of comprehensive neuropsychological assessment in DPHL even years post-injury.

Objective : Board certification (BC) in clinical neuropsychology via the American Board of Clinical Neuropsychology (ABCN) is a rigorous process demonstrating clinical competence to practice. While myths about BC have been addressed, barriers to BC have yet to be studied. The aim of this study was to identify barriers to BC among neuropsychology trainees and professionals. Method : Data were collected through pre-webinar surveys administered to 1202 participants across four webinars conducted between 2018 and 2021. The surveys, via open-ended questions, captured specific concerns about BC as well as, demographic information including self-identification with racial/ethnic and culturally diverse groups. Qualitative analyses of self-reported barriers were conducted, and themes were identified. Results : The themes identified included Preparedness (11.8%), Lack of Training and Mentoring Opportunities (5.8%), Training Flexibility (11.9%), BC Knowledge (13.4%), Overall Knowledge of neuropsychology (4.4%), Time (24.7%), Money (10.9%), Documentation (3.4%), International Issues (1.5%), and COVID-19 concerns (2.5%). Respondents that identified with a racial/ethnic diverse group were more likely to report Opportunities and International Issues , whereas White respondents more frequently identified Time and Documentation as barriers. Trainees were more likely to report Training Flexibility , Opportunities , BC Knowledge , whereas Professionals were more likely to report Preparedness and Time as barriers. Conclusions : Results from this survey demonstrate that Time , BC Knowledge , Training Flexibility , Preparedness , and Money related to the examination were the most frequently reported barriers. However, differences across groups (i.e. career stage, racial/ethnic) emerged, highlighting the need to develop initiatives that address the specific needs of different groups of neuropsychology trainees and professionals.

Objective: Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1) is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder that commonly presents with cognitive impairment and greater rates of learning disorders and academic difficulty compared to the general population. Investigations of neurological and physiological expression of NF-1 in monozygotic twins identified intrapair similarities and differences. Monozygotic twins with NF-1 have been found to have similar IQ scores as well as concordant diagnoses of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and learning disabilities. There have been no previous reports on similarities and differences in neuropsychological profiles between monozygotic twins with NF-1. The purpose of this article is to examine the results of comprehensive neuropsychological evaluations for a pair of monozygotic twins with NF-1. Method: A pair of 19-year-old female, African-American monozygotic twins with NF-1 underwent neuropsychological evaluations in an outpatient clinic. Findings are reported following the CAse REport (CARE) guidelines. Results: The twins demonstrated similar impairment in processing speed, working memory, and attention span; however, differences also were found. Conclusions: Intrapair similarities and differences on neuropsychological assessment were found between monozygotic twins with NF-1. Primary deficits were suggestive of a frontal-subcortical pattern and could be consistent with remote neuroimaging. When differences did occur, performance was typically better for Twin A, who had also showed greater improvement on neuroimaging. Implications and directions for future research are discussed. Specifically, this case demonstrates the need for inclusion of neuropsychological assessment in studies of larger cohorts of monozygotic twins with NF-1 and correlation of neuropsychological findings with neuroimaging and postzygotic mutations.