Search

Objective: People with functional seizures (FS) have frequent and disabling cognitive dysfunction and mental health symptoms, with low quality of life. However, interrelationships among these constructs are poorly understood. In this meta-analysis, we examined associations between objective (i.e. performance-based) cognitive testing and self-reported (i) mental health, (ii) cognition, and (iii) quality of life in FS. Method : We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and Web of Science, with the final search on June 10, 2024. Inclusion criteria were studies documenting relationships between objective cognitive test scores and self-reported (i.e. subjective) mental health, cognition, and/or quality of life in adults with FS. Exclusion criteria were mixed FS/epilepsy samples. A modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale evaluated risk of bias. This project is registered as CRD42023392385 in PROSPERO. Results : Initially, 4,054 unique reports were identified, with the final sample including 24 articles of 1,173 people with FS. Mean age was 35.9 (SD = 3.9), mean education was 12.6 (SD = 1.3), and proportion of women was 73.9%. Risk of bias was moderate, due in part to inconsistent reporting of confounding demographic variables. Significant relationships were found between global objective cognition and global self-reported mental health ( k  = 21, Z = -0.23 [0.04], 95% CI = -0.30, -0.16), depression ( k  = 11, Z = -0.13 [0.05], 95% CI = -0.21, -0.04), cognition ( k  = 5, Z = -0.16 [0.05], 95% CI = -0.26, -0.06), and quality of life ( k  = 5, Z = -0.17 [0.05], 95% CI = -0.24, -0.10). Exploratory analyses showed associations between select cognitive and mental health constructs. Conclusions : Objective cognition is reliably associated with self-reported mental health, cognition, and quality of life in people with FS. Scientific and clinical implications are discussed.

Objective: To introduce New2Neuropsychology (N2N), an organization that seeks to increase recruitment of historically underrepresented minoritized (URM) students, and to examine preliminary data on N2N's impact and effectiveness in increasing knowledge about neuropsychology for URM students., Method: This paper reviews relevant literature on factors informing the development of N2N. We also present descriptive data on N2N's impact to date, and results of pre- and post- surveys for presentations about neuropsychology delivered to 90 college students (mean age = 24.23, 64.4% juniors or seniors) between November 2021 - March 2023., Results: N2N has reached >500 students in events across 27 schools and, with the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology, disseminated $84,000 in scholarships to URM students. N2N presentation attendees reported increased understanding of neuropsychology and the training pathway ( p s < .001, Cohen's d s = 0.94 - 1.73) and increased confidence in their ability to become neuropsychologists (p < . 001, d  = 0.41). There were no overall pre-post differences for interest in pursuing a career in neuropsychology ( p > .05); however, a subset of students who reported low interest at baseline ( n =  57) reported a statistically significant increase in their interest post-presentation ( p < .01, d  = 0.36)., Conclusions: To date, N2N has progressed toward its goal, showing preliminary success increasing knowledge about neuropsychology for URM students. With continued development and support, N2N seeks to transform the pathway to neuropsychology for URM students, expanding accessibility of N2N resources across diverse groups and connecting URM students to neuropsychology research and clinical experiences.

Objectives: In response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, neuropsychologists rapidly adopted teleneuropsychology (TeleNP) services to ensure continued clinical care. Prior to COVID-19, TeleNP was not widely used nor was it included in the majority of traditional practice or training models across graduate, internship, and postdoctoral programs. Out of necessity, the pandemic was a catalyst that promoted greater adoption of TeleNP services. In response, neuropsychological guidelines for modified assessments were developed and further empirical studies have been published. Numerous surveys in response to service delivery changes during COVID-19 now exist, but what follows is a commentary based on neuropsychologists' experiences with adapting clinical practice to TeleNP. Methods: Co-authors represent settings across academic medical centers, Veterans Affairs hospitals, and private practices that serve multiculturally diverse pediatric, adult, and geriatric populations in the United States. Results: The perspectives within this commentary aim to highlight the growth of TeleNP and highlight lessons learned from implementation across practice settings. Conclusions: Our goal is to help foster the development of further empirical studies through candid discussion of various TeleNP experiences and approaches. Through this reflective process, TeleNP presents both opportunities and challenges but it ultimately has potential to reduce healthcare disparities and enhance patient care.