Search

Background: Hydration is a commonly used method to prevent the decline in GFR after contrast media (CM) application. So far, there have been no controlled, randomized trials investigating the most effective route of fluid administration., Methods: Thirty-nine patients with normal renal function (65 +/- 9 years, serum creatinine 0.9 +/- 0.2 mg/dl, GFR = 110 +/- 31 ml/min/1.73 m2) receiving at least 80 ml of low-osmolality CM during an angiographic procedure were randomized to one of the following hydration regimens: Group 1: volume expansion with 300 ml saline during CM administration (n = 20, serum creatinine 0.8 +/- 0.1 mg/dl, GFR 119 +/- 27 ml/min/1.73 m2); Group 2: intravenous administration of at least 2,000 ml saline within 12 h before and after CM application (n = 19, serum creatinine 0.9 +/- 0.2 mg/dl, GFR 101 +/- 32 ml/min/1.73 m2). GFR was measured by CM clearance (Renalyzer) at baseline and 48 hours after CM administration. The primary end point was the mean change in the GFR after 48 hours, the secondary one was the incidence of CM-induced nephropathy (CMIN), defined as a decrease in GFR of more than 50% from the baseline GFR within 48 hours., Results: Patients of group 1 showed a significantly (p < 0.05) higher decline in GFR (delta GFR 34.6 +/- 25.7 ml/min/1.73 m2) compared to patients receiving the intravenous prehydration regimen (delta GFR 18.3 +/- 25.0 ml/min/1.73 m2). The incidence of CMIN was lower in prehydrated patients (5.3%) compared to the other group (15%)., Conclusion: In patients with normal renal function, intravenous prehydration seems to be a very effective and feasible method to prevent the decline in GFR after contrast media exposure. Volume expansion given only during the CM exposure appears not to be sufficient enough to prevent renal damage.

The objective of our study was to evaluate the effects of subpressor doses of angiotensin II and mild physical stress on renal hemodynamics and urinary albumin excretion (UAE) in a group of young patients with essential hypertension compared to normotensive subjects. Eleven patients (26 +/- 6 years) and ten healthy control persons (25 +/- 2 years) were enrolled in the study. Secondary forms of hypertension had been excluded. Angiotensin II was infused at a dose of 0.3 and 1.0 ng/kg/min and physical stress testing was done with a cycle ergometer (50 W at 10 min for hypertensives, 100 W at 10 min for normotensives). Renal hemodynamics were assessed by clearance techniques (continuous insulin and p-aminohippurate clearance). Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and UAE were significantly higher in the hypertensive group than in normotensive control persons at any time of measurement. There was no significant increase in MAP or UAE under angiotensin II infusion either in the hypertensive group or in the normotensive group. MAP increased significantly under physical stress in the normotensive group only (83 +/- 7 mmHg baseline vs. 108 +/- mmHg during physical stress, p < 0.05). Angiotensin II infusion resulted in a significant change concerning renal hemodynamics in the hypertensive group only. The filtration fraction increased (18 +/- 3% baseline vs. 25 +/- 7% under infusion of 1.0 ng/kg/min angiotensin II, p < 0.05) due to a decline in ERPF and an increase in GFR in the hypertensive group. The amount of UAE correlated with the magnitude of the MAP in both groups. No correlation was found between renal hemodynamic parameters and the UAE. A significant correlation was found between the norepinephrine levels and the UAE in the control group. We could not demonstrate an albuminuric effect of subpressor doses of angiotensin II in normotensive or hypertensive subjects despite its well known effects on renal hemodynamics with an increase of the filtration fraction. These data provide evidence against a predominant role of angiotensin II and renal hemodynamics concerning the elevated urinary albumin excretion in young patients with arterial hypertension.

Endogenous nitric oxide (EDRF) plays an important role in the regulation of systemic and renal blood pressure by an alteration of vascular tone. To assess the effect of L-arginine (160 mumol/min i.v. for 3 hours), the precursor of EDRF, on blood pressure, protein-excretion and renal function (GFR = glomerular filtration rate, RPF = renal plasma flow) we performed a prospective, double blind, placebo controlled study. 18 patients with chronic glomerulonephritis (51.3 +/- 11.5 years), renal insufficiency (GFR < 65 ml/min) and hypertension were investigated for changes in GFR and RPF by continuous inulin- and PAH-clearances and for changes in permselectivity by determination of protein-excretion. L-arginine infusion results in a reduction of proteinuria (p < 0.05, t-test). There is no significant effect on renal hemodynamics and mean arterial pressure (MAP). Comparing the excretion of the endogenous proteins, only albuminuria is decreased significantly (p < 0.01), whereas IgG-excretion is reduced slightly (p < 0.05). This can be considered as an indicator of a special influence on the mesangial cells or the basement membrane of the glomerulum itself by EDRF. In conclusion L-arginine reduces protein-excretion without significant alterations in renal hemodynamics and so might prevent a decline in renal failure.

ACE-inhibitors are known to have special renal effects, i.e. they increase ERPF, decrease the filtration fraction and lower proteinuria. These effects can be due to a decrease in angiotensin II (AII) levels as well as an increase in bradykinin. New and more specific AII-receptor antagonists may help to distinguish between effects exerted by angiotensin II and those exerted by bradykinin. We investigated the effects of losartan in 9 patients with essential hypertension (sitting mean diastolic blood pressure 95-120 mmHg). Renal hemodynamics were measured by continuous inulin-and PAH-clearance (GFR and RPF) after stopping antihypertensive therapy for 1 week, followed by a 2-week placebo period and after a 4-week treatment phase with losartan (50 mg/die) followed by a therapy with an ACE-inhibitor (ramipril 5mg/die). Additionally, urine albumin excretion (UAE) was measured. Treatment of patients with essential hypertension with losartan resulted in a significant decrease of MAP after three weeks of treatment (121 +/- 8 mmHg under placebo and 114 +/- 10 mmHg under losartan; * = p < 0.05). MAP after four weeks of losartan treatment was 115 +/- 11 mmHg. Regarding changes in renal hemodynamics we could not demonstrate a significant change for neither losartan nor the ACE-inhibitor. Urine albumin excretion was reduced by both treatment regimens in correlation to the magnitude of blood pressure reduction. Our data indicate that losartan induced a significant reduction in MAP in patients with essential arterial hypertension with only moderate effects on renal hemodynamics.