Search

Introduction: BV is an antibody-drug conjugate directed against CD30 and is safe and effective in relapsed/refractory (R/R) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Most patients with r/r cHL respond well to BV monotherapy; however, the large of majority of them eventually progress on this drug, and BV-resistant HL remains an unmet need. Preclinical data suggest that BV resistance is mediated at least in part by increased drug efflux associated with increased expression of multidrug resistance pump 1 (MDR1) while CD30 expression appears to be preserved in BV resistant cell lines and patient samples. We conducted a phase 1 study evaluating BV + cyclosporine (CsA) in BV-refractory HL and previous reported results in the dose finding cohort. Here we report the final results from the phase 1 study., Methods: This was a phase I trial of BV + CsA in patients with r/r HL with dose-finding and dose escalation cohorts. Eligibility criteria included age ≥ 18 years with r/r HL after at least 1 prior line of therapy. Treatment consisted of 1.8 mg/kg BV intravenously on day 1 and CsA 5 to 7.5 mg/kg PO twice daily on days 1 to 5; cycles were 21 days long. Patients in the expansion cohort had to have cHL refractory to BV. The primary objectives were to evaluate safety and tolerability and to determine MTD of BV + CsA; the secondary objective was to determine efficacy of this combination., Results: 29 patients were enrolled onto the study, 14 in the dose finding cohort and 15 in the dose expansion BV refractory cohort. Study accrual was terminated before target accrual due to unacceptable toxicity. 62% of patients were male, and the median age was 36 years (range: 20-69). The median number of prior therapies was 5 (range: 3-12); all patients had prior BV, and 93% had PD-1 directed therapy, and 93% were BV-refractory. Of 22 evaluable patients, CR rate was 27% and ORR 64%; median DOR 4.9 months. Treatment-related deaths occurred in 3 patients, and another patient died during cycle 1 due to cardiac arrest deemed unlikely related to be protocol therapy. All grade GI toxicity was seen in 90% of patients (G3+ in 24%); other common adverse events were nausea (90%), hypertension (90%), nausea (90%), hypertension (90%), anemia (86%), fatigue (76%), neutropenia (76%), leukopenia (76%), hypomagnesemia (76%), anorexia (66%), and hyponatremia (66%)., Discussion: BV + CsA demonstrated modest activity in BV-refractory r/r HL; however, toxicity is substantial., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Brentuximab vedotin (BV) is an antibody-drug conjugate that delivers monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) to CD30+ cells and is safe and effective in relapsed/refractory (r/r) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Although most patients respond to BV, only a minority will obtain a complete response (CR), and almost all patients eventually progress. Ibrutinib is a Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor highly active in multiple subtypes of non-Hodgkin lymphoma; limited data exist regarding its use in HL. It irreversibly inhibits interleukin-2-inducible kinase (ITK) with Th1 based immune responses. As we previously observed preclinical synergy between ibrutinib and BV, we hypothesized ibrutinib may enhance the antitumor activity of BV in HL. We designed and conducted a phase II trial of ibrutinib plus BV in patients with R/R HL, and herein report the final primary analysis of safety and efficacy., Methods: This was a multicenter phase II trial with a lead-in cohort in patients with r/r HL. Eligibility criteria included age ≥ 15 years with r/r HL after at least one prior line of therapy. Treatment consisted of 1.8 mg/kg BV intravenously every 3 weeks and ibrutinib 560 mg PO daily (420 mg PO daily in the lead-in cohort). Prior BV was allowed if patients were not refractory. The primary endpoint was the CR rate according to Lugano 2014. Secondary endpoints included toxicities, overall response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DOR)., Results: The 39 patients were enrolled onto the study, of which 67% were male; the median age was 33 (range: 17-71). 38% had extranodal disease at baseline, 51% had advanced stage disease, 51% were refractory to the prior therapy, and 21% had prior BV. Of 36 patients who were evaluable for response, the CR rate was 33% and ORR 64%; median DOR was 25.5 months. Thirteen patients proceeded to autologous transplant and 3 patients proceeded to allogeneic transplant for consolidation after response. The most common adverse events were nausea (67%), peripheral neuropathy (62%), diarrhea (59%), fatigue (46%), thrombocytopenia (46%), headache (41%), rash (41%), elevated ALT (38%), anemia (36%), vomiting (36%), abdominal pain (33%), fever (33%), and hypertension (33%). Six patients experienced unacceptable toxicity, defined as Gr 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity or non-resolving Gr 3/4 hematologic toxicity including one patient who died of multiorgan failure from suspected COVID-19 infection during cycle 1., Discussion: The combination of BV and ibrutinib was active in r/r HL; however, given significant toxicity, it cannot be recommended for future development., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Although a rare subset of non-Hodgkin lymphomas, peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) account for a disproportionate proportion of patient mortality. Conventional therapies are derived from experience treating aggressive B-cell lymphomas and center around CHOP-based chemotherapy. However, due to the unique biology and diverse subtypes of PTCL, most patients fail to durably respond to this approach and 5-year survival is only 20% to 30%. There have been multiple attempts to improve outcomes for patients with PTCL. Among the more successful strategies are the use of consolidative autologous stem cell transplant, the augmentation of CHOP with etoposide (CHOEP), and the use of brentuximab vedotin in CD30-positive PTCL. Advances in the understanding of histology-specific biology has cultivated enthusiasm to evaluate hypomethylating agents, histone deacetylate inhibitors, and phosphoinositol-3-kinase inhibitors in the frontline setting. Improvements in monitoring disease response and prognostication including the use of cell-free DNA, mutational profiling, and interim PET/CT imaging are also on the horizon. For patients with acute T-cell leukemia/lymphoma, the use of mogamulizumab-based therapy in the frontline setting may lead to advances in care. The true impact of these new-era therapies will only be elucidated as clinical practices incorporate the rapidly changing evidence., Competing Interests: Disclosure NMS has received institutional clinical trial funding from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers-Squibb, Celgene, C4 Therapeutics, Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Daiichi Sankyo, Genentech/Roche, Innate Pharmaceuticals, Secura Bio/Verastem, Yingli Pharmaceuticals and Dizal pharmaceuticals. She has received compensation for service as a consultant for Astrazeneca, Secura Bio/Verastem, Daiichi Sankyo, C4 Therapeutics, Genentech, Karyopharm Therapeutics, and Kyowa Hakko Kirin. JSB and NCF have no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose. NMS is a clinical research scholar of the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction/background: Primary cutaneous anaplastic large-cell lymphomas (pcALCLs) are a type of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) in which CD30 is uniformly expressed. In mycosis fungoides (MF), another CTCL, CD30 is heterogeneously expressed. In ALCANZA, patients with pcALCLs or CD30-positive MF randomized to brentuximab vedotin (BV) vs. physician's choice of methotrexate or bexarotene had significantly improved outcomes, including higher objective response rates (ORR) lasting ≥4 months (ORR4), as well as longer median progression-free survival (PFS) and time to next treatment (TTNT). In this study, we sought to assess the real-world impact of treatment with BV in second or later lines of therapy for CTCL., Materials and Methods: This retrospective chart review describes patient characteristics, treatment patterns, clinical outcomes, and healthcare resource use (HRU) in patients with pcALCLs or MF previously treated with ≥1 systemic therapy and subsequently treated with BV (n = 139) or other standard therapy (OST; n = 164)., Results: Most patients in the BV cohort (96.4%) received BV as second-line (2L) systemic therapy. The most common OSTs were methotrexate (11.6%), mogamulizumab (9.1%), and bendamustine (9.1%) monotherapies. For 2L BV and OST, median duration of therapy was 8.4 and 5.2 months, real-world ORR was 82.1% and 66.5%, and real-world ORR4 was 42.5% and 25.0%. Real-world 1- and 2-year PFS, TTNT, and OS were significantly longer (all P < .01) and HRU was lower for BV vs. OST., Conclusion: These real-world outcomes are consistent with ALCANZA results, demonstrating favorable outcomes with BV vs. OST in patients with CTCL previously treated with ≥1 systemic therapy., Competing Interests: Disclosure Stefan K. Barta: Consulting Fees: Affimed, Daiichi Sankyo, and Kyowa Kirin; Payment or honoraria for educational events: Acrotech, Kyowa Kirin, and Seagen Inc.; Membership: NCCN T-Cell and Cutaneous Lymphoma Panel; Nicholas Liu: Employee of Seagen Inc.; Stock/Stock Options: Seagen Inc.; Maral DerSarkissian: Employee of Analysis Group, which received research funding from Seagen Inc. to conduct this study; Rose Chang: Employee of Analysis Group, which received research funding from Seagen Inc. to conduct this study; Mingchen Ye: Employee of Analysis Group, which received research funding from Seagen Inc. to conduct this study; Mei Sheng Duh: Employee of Analysis Group, which received research funding from Seagen Inc. to conduct this study; Andy Surinach: Employee of Genesis Research, which received research funding from Seagen Inc. to conduct this study; Michelle Fanale: Employee of Seagen Inc.; Stock/Stock Options: Seagen Inc.; Kristina S. Yu: Employee of Seagen Inc.; Stock/Stock Options: Seagen Inc., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Classic Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a unique lymphoid malignancy where the malignant cells comprise only 1% to 2% of the total tumor cellularity. Over the past 2 decades, the treatment of HL has evolved drastically based on the advent of novel targeted therapies. Novel agents including programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates such as brentuximab vedotin, bispecific antibodies, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies have served to shape the management of HL in the frontline as well as the relapsed and refractory (R/R) setting. Some of these agents have been incorporated into treatment algorithms, while others are currently under investigation demonstrating promising results. This review focuses on highlighting the underlying tumor biology forming the basis of therapeutics in HL, and reviews some of the emerging and established novel therapies., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Brentuximab-vedotin (BV) monotherapy has shown high efficacy in heavily pre-treated patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) after high-dose chemotherapy or autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of treatment with BV of HL patients and examined the predictive ability of PET-CT for response in this setting., Patients and Methods: Records of 49 HL patients (median age, 39 years, 55% male) treated with BV for relapse (71.4%) or consolidation (28.6%) post-ASCT were analyzed. Patients who did not reach complete response (CR) on PET/CT after 4 cycles (non-responders) discontinued BV and received the next treatment line. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between responders and non-responders., Results: After a median follow-up of 19.1 months, all consolidation patients were alive and none progressed. Median OS in 23 relapsed patients that did not achieve CR after 4 cycles and continued to the next treatment was 55.0 months, while all those in CR (n = 24) were alive (P = .0120). No statistically significant differences in OS were observed between responders and non-responders with relapsed HL (P = .1072). Median PFS evaluated after 4 BV cycles was significantly longer in responders compared to non-responders (47.9 vs. 1.5 months, P < .0001). Neuropathy and neutropenia were the main toxicities observed., Conclusions: HL patients treated with BV for relapse or consolidation who achieved CR by PET-CT after 4 cycles showed improved PFS and OS compared to non-responders. Non-responders treated for relapsed HL who proceeded to the next treatment line demonstrated comparable OS to responders., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)