Search

Background: Lenalidomide (R), bortezomib (V), and dexamethasone (d) is a standard-of-care regimen in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM); however, characteristics and outcomes for nontransplanted patients receiving frontline RVd are not well understood., Patients: The Connect Ⓡ MM Registry is a large, US, multicenter, prospective observational cohort study of NDMM patients., Methods: This analysis investigated characteristics and outcomes of patients who received RVd alone or followed by Rd or R (RVd ± Rd/R) who did not undergo frontline autologous stem cell transplantation., Results: As of August 2021, 314 of 1979 nontransplanted patients received RVd ± Rd/R as initial therapy. Of these, 135 were aged ≤ 65 years and 179 were > 65 years. 108 patients had time to relapse (TTR) of ≤ 12 months and 182 had TTR > 12 months. Baseline characteristics were comparable regardless of TTR and age group except renal function, which was more commonly impaired in older patients. Among patients aged ≤ 65 and > 65 years, median duration of first-line treatment was 6.3 and 9.0 months, median time to next line for those who received second-line therapy was 15.5 and 15.2 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 19.3 and 23.0 months, and median overall survival was 60.0 and 59.1 months, respectively. High-risk disease (per IMWG criteria) and high serum calcium were associated with higher hazard of progression or death; the adjusted PFS hazard ratio with respect to age (≤ 65 vs. > 65 years) based on multivariable analysis was 1.18 (0.89-1.57; P = .25)., Conclusion: These results indicate RVd is active across age groups and provide a better understanding of outcomes with RVd in NDMM., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Isatuximab-based combinations are among the accepted standard-of-care regimens for early-line treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), based on the results of the Phase 3 ICARIA-MM and IKEMA trials. Further study findings have shown benefit with Isa-based combinations in patients with newly diagnosed MM, as reported from the randomized GMMG-HD7 and CONCEPT trials. Isa is currently approved in various countries for intravenous (IV) administration in patients with RRMM. A more convenient route of administration, such as subcutaneous (SC) injection, and faster IV infusion may substantially increase convenience of treatment. In this review, we outline evidence emerging from clinical trials that shows increasing clinical applicability of Isa across the MM therapeutic spectrum. We then review recent study results demonstrating that new treatment modalities, either SC Isa administration via an on-body delivery system (OBDS) or fast, 30-minute, fixed-volume IV infusion, are safe and effective, and enhance convenience of treatment with Isa for MM patients and healthcare providers. In the recently reported Phase 1b study, the safety profile and efficacy of Isa administered SC plus pomalidomide-dexamethasone were comparable to those observed with Isa administered IV plus pomalidomide-dexamethasone in the control arm and in the ICARIA-MM trial. Analysis of patient-reported outcomes indicated patient confidence in SC Isa administration and satisfaction with treatment delivery by OBDS. These findings point to SC administration as the preferred route for future treatment with Isa-based combinations, as well as to the use of fast, 30-minute IV infusions in settings where SC administration of Isa might not be available., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies offer substantial advancement in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). However, the CAR-T therapy process involves complex decision-making that is informed by many variables. This review aims to provide an overview of the patient selection and administration process for CAR-T therapy for MM from the perspective of experienced healthcare providers (HCPs), including considerations for each step in the CAR-T therapy process. Referring HCPs should initiate conversations with HCPs at CAR-T capable centers earlier in the treatment journey, even before patients are eligible for CAR-T therapy, particularly for patients from underserved populations and patients with high-risk disease, to ensure adequate time for logistical planning and patient education. Patient selection for CAR-T therapy may be guided by factors such as performance status, rate of disease progression, and logistical considerations. Some anticancer therapies may affect T-cell fitness and therefore impact CAR-T manufacturing and patient outcomes; however, additional research is needed to confirm this in MM. Bridging therapies should be tailored to the needs of the patient and ideally halted 1 week or longer before CAR-T infusion, contingent upon the agent(s) used. Lymphodepletion regimens may need to be modified for patients with renal insufficiency. Collaboration with HCPs at both the treating and referring centers is important to optimize coordinated care of patients. Collaboration with and guidance from experienced HCPs throughout patient selection, referral, and CAR-T administration is instrumental in optimizing patient outcomes as access to CAR-T therapies expands., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All authors received compensation from Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc, and Legend Biotech USA, Inc, for participation in an advisory board to discuss the topics described in this review article prior to initiation of manuscript development; however, authors received no compensation for their involvement as authors of this article. Additional disclosures include the following: SA reports consulting for Amgen, Beigene, BMS, GSK, Janssen Astra Zeneca, Pharmacyclics, Regeneron, Sanofi, and Takeda and receiving research funding from AbbVie, Amgen, Ascentage, BMS, Cellectar, GSK, Janssen, Medimmune, Pharmacyclics, and Xencor. SJ reports consulting for Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Legend Biotech, Merck, Sanofi, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals and is the Senior Editor-in-Chief of Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia. YL reports consulting for bluebird bio, Celgene/BMS, Fosun Kite, Gamida Cell, Iovance, Janssen, Juno/BMS, Kite/Gilead, Legend BioTech, Novartis, Pfizer, and Takeda; receiving grant/research support from bluebird bio, Boston Scientific, Celgene/BMS, Janssen, Kite/Gilead, Legend Biotech, Merck, and Takeda; and serving on a data safety and monitoring board for Sorrento, a data review committee for Pfizer, and a scientific advisory committee for NexImmune. KP reports consulting for Arcellx, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, and Pfizer; research funding from AbbVie/Genentech, Allogene Therapeutics, Celgene/GMS, Cellectis, Janssen, Nektar, Poseida, Precision Biosciences, and Takeda; and travel funds from BMS. LS reports consulting for Janssen. SWW reports consulting for Amgen and Sanofi and research funding from BMS, Caelum, Fortis, Genentech, GSK, and Janssen., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In preclinical models, combining a GLUT4 inhibitor with an oxidative phosphorylation inhibitor shows synergistic therapeutic potential against multiple myeloma (MM). Thus, this study evaluated the safety and tolerability of repurposing metformin, a complex I inhibitor, and nelfinavir, a GLUT4 inhibitor, in combination with bortezomib for the treatment of relapsed/refractory MM that had progressed on all standard of care therapies., Materials and Methods: This trial utilized a 3 + 3 dose escalation design with 3 dose levels planned for up to a maximum of 6 (21-day) cycles. Metformin and nelfinavir were administered for 14 of 21 days, and subQ bortezomib was administered to a portion of patients on days 1, 8, and 15. The primary objective was to determine the maximal tolerated dose, and the secondary objective was to evaluate the safety and overall response rate (ORR) of this combination., Results: Nine patients were accrued with a median age of 65 (range: 42-81) and received a median of 7 prior lines of therapy (Range: 5-12). The first 3 patients received only metformin (500 mg BID) and nelfinavir (1250 mg BID) at the first dose level, with 1 patient experiencing an unconfirmed minimal response (MR) in the first cycle, 1 experiencing progressive disease after 1 cycle of treatment and 1 patient going off treatment prior to assessing response but with signs of progressive disease. Given the limited therapeutic activity, the upfront addition of bortezomib (1.3 mg/m 2 ) was utilized for the subsequent 6 patients accrued. Three of these 6 patients went off study due to progressive disease, 1 patient achieved an unconfirmed partial response after 1 cycle of treatment but reported progressive disease in the subsequent cycle, 1 patient went off study to enter hospice, and the remaining patient experienced stable disease (SD) after receiving 6 cycles of clinical trial treatment. The study was closed before accrual to the next dose level was started., Conclusion: This is the first study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this repurposed drug combination in this very difficult-to-treat population of relapsed and refractory MM. This was an overall negative study with no ORR observed. Fortunately, 1 patient experienced an SD response, allowing this combination to stabilize their disease until another novel therapy on a clinical trial was available., Competing Interests: Disclosure These authors declare no competing financial interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Adults with triple-class refractory (TCR) multiple myeloma (MM) have limited treatment options and poor prognosis, but the burden of TCR MM has not been well characterized. This study evaluated treatment patterns, overall survival (OS), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and healthcare resource use (HCRU) among patients with TCR MM in US clinical practice., Patients and Methods: Patients with TCR MM in the Connect MM Registry (NCT01081028; a large, US, multicenter, prospective observational cohort study of patients with newly diagnosed MM) were included. Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, HRQoL, and HCRU were analyzed using descriptive statistics. OS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier methodology for the overall cohort and for patients with/without ≥1 post-TCR line of therapy (LOT)., Results: A total of 232 patients with TCR MM were included; 155 (67%) had ≥1 post-TCR LOT (post-TCR-Treated subgroup; median 9.9 months of follow-up). Most common post-TCR treatments were carfilzomib (47%), pomalidomide (40%), and daratumumab (26%); median treatment duration was 3.3 months. Median OS was 9.9 months in the overall population, 10.8 months in post-TCR-Treated patients, and 2.6 months for those with no new post-TCR LOT. HRQoL deteriorated and pain increased over 1 year of follow-up, with clinically meaningfully changes in EQ-5D (mean, -0.06 points) and FACT-G (mean, -9.9 points). 124 (53%) patients had ≥1 all-cause hospitalization and 58 (25%) had ≥1 MM-related hospitalization; median annualized length of stay was 35.3 and 42.9 days, respectively., Conclusion: The burden of TCR MM is substantial, emphasizing the need for more effective treatment options in the TCR setting., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The t (11;14) (q13;32) translocation [t (11;14)] is present in ∼20% of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), but studies examining its prognostic ability have yielded divergent results, and data are lacking on outcomes from first-line therapy., Patients and Methods: Data from the Connect MM Registry, a large US, multicenter, prospective observational cohort study of patients with NDMM were used to examine the effect of t (11;14) status on first-line therapy outcomes in the Overall population (n = 1574) and race groups (African American [AA] vs. non-African American [NAA])., Results: Baseline characteristics were generally similar between patients with (n = 378) and without (n = 1196) t (11;14). Prevalence of t (11;14) was similar by race (AA, 27%; NAA, 24%). In the overall population, regardless of first-line therapy, t (11;14) status did not affect progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 1.02; P = 0.7675) or overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.99; P = .9417). AA patients with t (11;14) had higher likelihood of death (Nominal Cox regression P = .0298) vs. patients without t (11;14)., Conclusions: Acknowledging observational study and inferential limitations, this exploratory analysis of a predominantly community-based population suggests that t (11;14) is a neutral prognostic factor in the general MM population but may be a negative factor for overall survival in AA patients., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: Despite significant improvements in multiple myeloma (MM) treatment modalities, patient mortality early in the course of disease has been identified as a persistent phenomenon with variable reported rates and causes. Trends in early mortality over time have not been clearly defined., Patients and Methods: The Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify adult patients with MM between 1975 and 2015. Association of available sociodemographic factors with all-cause and MM-specific early mortality (death within 6 months after the diagnosis of MM) was conducted by multivariate analysis. Trends in early mortality were studied by joinpoint regression analysis., Results: Of the 90,975 MM cases included in this analysis, early mortality was noted in 21%. Median age was 68 years overall, and 75 years for the early mortality cohort (P < .01). The most common causes of death for early mortality were MM itself, followed by cardiovascular, infections, and renal failure. Male gender, "other" race/ethnicity group, advancing age, and West, Midwest or South regions (reference Northeast) were associated with increased risk of both all-cause and MM-specific early mortality. Joinpoint regression analysis of trends data resulted in 1 joinpoint for all-cause 6-month mortality (2006-2015), while 2 joinpoints were noticed for myeloma-specific 6-month mortality (1975-1987 and 2003-2015)., Conclusion: Early mortality remains a significant unmet need for MM patient care, despite improving trends in recent years. Understanding the factors associated with early mortality can help develop individualized plans of patient care and mitigate circumstances that may contribute to early mortality among MM patients., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Outcomes in multiple myeloma (MM) have improved significantly over time. This is true overall for all patients as well as patient subgroups based on age and race/ethnicity. Despite this, disparities are noted in outcomes when looking at racial subgroups., Materials and Methods: We performed an analysis from the population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to evaluate improvement in relative survival rates (RSRs) for young (≤ 40 years at the time of MM diagnosis) and older (> 40 years at the time of MM diagnosis) over time by race/ethnicity, specifically focusing on Hispanic patients with MM. Expected survival was estimated using the age- and gender-specific death rates from the United States population. RSR was provided as the ratio of the observed to expected survival at individual time points. Five-year and 10-year RSRs were calculated for patients based on treatments modalities available in various time periods., Results: We identified a total of 89,451 patients with MM in SEER, of which 1460 patients formed the young patients with MM (≤ 40 years) cohort. Five- and 10-year RSR improved significantly over time for all patients and older patients (> 40 years) by race (all P < .001). Evaluating the younger patients, RSR improved significantly for non-Hispanic whites and non-Hispanic blacks, but not for Hispanics. This was true for the 5-year (P = .08) and 10-year (P = .13) RSRs., Conclusion: We report a lack of significant benefit in long-term outcomes for younger Hispanic patients with MM over time. This could be owing to multifactorial causes that need to be addressed to mitigate outcome disparities., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Indatuximab ravtansine (BT062) is an antibody-drug conjugate that binds to CD138, which is overexpressed on multiple myeloma (MM) cells., Patients and Methods: We report from 2 clinical studies of patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM previously treated with an immunomodulatory drug and a proteasome inhibitor. Single- and multi-dosing schedules were investigated to define dose-limiting toxicities, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase II dose, and to describe safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics., Results: In the first-in-human study, indatuximab ravtansine was administered to 32 patients on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The MTD was 160 mg/m 2 . In the phase I/IIa study, indatuximab ravtansine was administered to 35 patients on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle, and the MTD/recommended phase II dose was 140 mg/m 2 . Most (88%) adverse events were grade 1 or 2, the most common being diarrhea and fatigue. There was rapid clearance of indatuximab ravtansine and no relevant accumulation. Over 75% of heavily pretreated patients achieved stable disease or better. With the multi-dose schedule, minor and partial responses occurred in 14.7% of patients, the median time to progression was 3 months, and the median overall survival was 26.7 months., Conclusion: Our data support further investigation of indatuximab ravtansine as part of a combination regimen for relapsed and/or refractory MM., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Proteasome inhibition is an established treatment strategy for patients with multiple myeloma as proteasome inhibitors (PIs) selectively target and disrupt the protein metabolism of aberrant plasma cells. Since the introduction of the first-in-class PIs bortezomib, the therapeutic landscape for multiple myeloma has shifted with the development of next-generation PIs (carfilzomib and ixazomib) and new classes of agents. Treatment with modern combination therapies has been shown to result in deep responses and improved outcomes, and these potent regimens are increasingly used as frontline therapy. As patients continue to live longer with modern frontline therapy, there will be an increased need for effective regimens after initial treatment failure. Several recent studies have shown that treatment with combination therapy incorporating PIs induces deep and durable responses in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. In this review, we review pivotal data and discuss the role of PIs-based doublet and triplet regimens for the management of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in the era of modern combination therapy., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Despite therapeutic advancements that have significantly improved outcomes in multiple myeloma (MM), it remains an incurable disease. Patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM have an aggressive disease course, with inferior outcomes, necessitating the need for agents with novel therapeutic mechanisms. We present the results of a completed phase I trial of single-agent lorvotuzumab mertansine, a unique antibody-drug conjugate targeting CD56, which is frequently expressed in MM., Patients and Methods: Thirty-seven patients with relapsed MM were enrolled in a dose-escalation phase I clinical trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose of lorvotuzumab mertansine (112 mg/m 2 ), followed by an expansion phase at the maximum tolerated dose., Results: Despite a high proportion of patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM (56.8%), stable disease or better was noted in 42.9% of patients, and these patients had a long duration of response (median, 15.5 months). The adverse event profile was favorable, with a low incidence of grade 3/4 adverse events and no infusion-related reactions. No humoral responses were detected against the study drug., Conclusion: This completed phase I trial of single-agent lorvotuzumab mertansine provides ample evidence of safety and signals of clinical activity for this agent, warranting its further clinical development as part of combination regimens for the management of MM., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The present study analyzed the trends in secondary cancer (SC) risks among Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients in the United States., Materials and Methods: Patients with HL diagnosed from 1973 to 2014 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. We compared the risk of SCs in HL patients relative to the risk in the US general population across 3 periods: 1973 to 1986, 1987 to 2000, and 2001 to 2014 to study the effect of treatment practices on the development of SCs., Results: In a follow-up study of 23,864 HL survivors for 284,730 person-years, 3260 SCs were diagnosed with a standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of 1.97 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-2.04). A statistically significant decrease was found in the overall SIRs of SCs diagnosed in HL patients from 1987 to 2000 (SIR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.72-1.93) and from 2001 to 2014 (SIR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.51-1.82) relative to patients with SCs diagnosed from 1973 to 1986 (SIR, 2.24; 95% CI, 2.13-2.35). The decline in the overall SIR mostly resulted from declines in digestive tract and breast cancers. The SIRs of most other solid tumors and hematologic malignancies did not decrease. After adjusting for age, gender, and race, patients with a diagnosis from 1973 to 1986 had a 12% greater risk of developing SCs (hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.03-1.23; P = .01) compared with the patients with a diagnosis from 1987 to 2000., Conclusion: Although the overall risk of SCs in patients with HL declined after modifications in HL treatment, the risk did not change significantly at most individual sites. Thus, close follow-up with active surveillance for SCs is crucial for long-term survivors of HL., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: As of 2013, more than 550,000 people are living with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL)., Patients and Methods: We undertook a large Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) based analysis to describe outcome disparities in different subgroups of aggressive T-cell and B-cell NHL patients, with a focus on various ethnicities., Results: The final analysis included 7662 patients with T-cell and 84,910 with B-cell NHL. Survival analysis revealed that male sex and increasing age were independent predictors of worse overall survival (OS; P < .001). For aggressive T-cell NHL, there was no significant improvement in median OS between 1973 and 2011 (P = .081), and ethnic minorities (Asians, Hispanics, and African Americans) had significantly worse OS than whites (P < .001). There were similar trends for age, sex, and race for diffuse large B-cell NHL, but a significant improvement in median OS was seen over time (P < .001)., Conclusion: These results are the first to elicit outcomes in a broad classification of ethnic minorities and underscore the urgency for development of novel therapeutics, especially in T-cell NHL. In addition, in-depth studies of disease biology and health care utilization are required for better triage of health care resources, especially for ethnic minorities., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)