Search

Background Sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) have cardioprotective and renoprotective effects. However, experience with SGLT2is in diabetic kidney transplant recipients (DKTRs) is limited. Methods This observational multicentre study was designed to examine the efficacy and safety of SGLT2is in DKTRs. The primary outcome was adverse effects within 6 months of SGLT2i treatment. Results Among 339 treated DKTRs, adverse effects were recorded in 26%, the most frequent (14%) being urinary tract infection (UTI). In 10%, SGLT2is were suspended mostly because of UTI. Risk factors for developing a UTI were a prior episode of UTI in the 6 months leading up to SGLT2i use {odds ratio [OR] 7.90 [confidence interval (CI) 3.63–17.21]} and female sex [OR 2.46 (CI 1.19–5.03)]. In a post hoc subgroup analysis, the incidence of UTI emerged as similar in DKTRs treated with SGLT2i for 12 months versus non-DKTRs (17.9% versus 16.7%). Between baseline and 6 months, significant reductions were observed in body weight [−2.22 kg (95% CI −2.79 to −1.65)], blood pressure, fasting glycaemia, haemoglobin A1c [−0.36% (95% CI −0.51 to −0.21)], serum uric acid [−0.44 mg/dl (95% CI −0.60 to −0.28)] and urinary protein:creatinine ratio, while serum magnesium [+0.15 mg/dl (95% CI 0.11–0.18)] and haemoglobin levels rose [+0.44 g/dl (95% CI 0.28–0.58]. These outcomes persisted in participants followed over 12 months of treatment. Conclusions SGLT2is in kidney transplant offer benefits in terms of controlling glycaemia, weight, blood pressure, anaemia, proteinuria and serum uric acid and magnesium. UTI was the most frequent adverse effect. According to our findings, these agents should be prescribed with caution in female DKTRs and those with a history of UTI.

Background. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARB) decrease cardiovascular mortality and slow the progression of renal disease in non-transplant patients, but their impact on kidney transplant outcome has not been well established. Methods. Patients receiving a renal allograft in Spain in 1990, 1994, 1998 and 2002 were considered for the present study. Only adult (≥18 years) recipients of a single kidney transplant functioning at the end of the first year were considered. A total of 4842 patients with clinical data about ACEI/ARB therapy were included. Results. During the initial 2 years after transplant, ACEI/ARB were less frequently used in the 1990 and 1994 cohorts than in 1998 and 2002 (15.1%, 24.6%, 33.5% and 45.1%, respectively; P < 0.001). During the first year, a total of 1063 patients (22.8%) received ACEI/ARB treatment, and graft survival (50.0% for treated patients and 51.4% for untreated, P = ns), death-censored graft survival (60.6% versus 63.5%, P = ns) and patient survival (68.8% versus 66.6%, P = ns) were not different. During the initial 2 years, 1472 patients (31.4%) received treatment with ACEI/ARB, and graft survival tended to be higher in treated patients (54.4% and 50.9%, P = 0.063). Since there was an interaction between ACEI/ARB treatment and year of transplant, graft survival was analysed in each cohort. Cox regression analysis including the propensity score for ACEI/ARB treatment showed an association between ACEI/ARB treatment and graft survival in the 2002 cohort (relative risk 0.36 and 95% confidence interval 0.17–0.75, P = 0.007). Death-censored graft survival (63.8% versus 63.1%, P = ns) and patient survival (68.1% and 66.5%, P = ns) were not significantly different. Conclusions. The use of ACEI/ARB during the initial 2 years after transplantation was associated with a better graft survival, but this effect was only observed in the 2002 cohort.