1. Comparison of Shock Transmission and Forearm Electromyography Between Experienced and Recreational Tennis Players During Backhand Strokes
- Author
-
Hsiao Yun Chang, Jinn Yen Chiang, Tzyy Yuang Shiang, and Shun Hwa Wei
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Elbow ,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation ,Electromyography ,Wrist ,Backhand ,Physical medicine and rehabilitation ,Forearm ,Elbow Joint ,Racket ,medicine ,Humans ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,computer.programming_language ,biology ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,Athletes ,business.industry ,Tennis Elbow ,musculoskeletal system ,biology.organism_classification ,medicine.disease ,body regions ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Tennis ,Physical therapy ,Musculoskeletal injury ,business ,human activities ,computer - Abstract
OBJECTIVE To test the hypothesis that recreational tennis players transmit more shock impact from the racket to the elbow joint than experienced tennis players during the backhand stroke. Also, to test whether recreational tennis players used higher electromyographic (EMG) activities in common wrist extensor and flexor around epicondylar region at follow-through phase. DESIGN A repeated-measure, cross-sectional study. SETTING National College of Physical Education and Sports at Taipei, Taiwan. PARTICIPANTS Twenty-four male tennis players with no abnormal forearm musculoskeletal injury participated in the study. According to performance level, subjects were categorized into 2 groups: experienced and recreational. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Impact transmission and wrist extensor-flexor EMG for backhand acceleration, impact, and follow-through phases were recorded for each player. An independent t test with a significance level of 0.05 was used to examine mean differences of shock impact and EMG between the 2 test groups. One-way ANOVA associated with Tukey multiple comparisons was used to identify differences among different impact locations and EMG phases. RESULTS Experienced athletes reduced the racket impact to the elbow joint by 89.2%, but recreational players reduced it by only 61.8%. The largest EMG differences were found in the follow-through phase (P
- Published
- 2006
- Full Text
- View/download PDF