Search

Background Information on human filariasis in international travelers is scarce. We describe the epidemiology, clinical presentation, and outcome of these infections in a reference travel clinic over the past decades. Methods We reviewed all cases of filariasis diagnosed at the Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium, from 1994 to 2018. Diagnosis was obtained by either parasitological methods (confirmed) or strict clinical case definitions (probable). We assessed the characteristics of cases at diagnosis and response to therapy within 3–12 months. Results A total of 320 patients (median age: 41 years; 71% males) were diagnosed with 327 filarial infections (Wuchereria bancrofti = 6, Onchocerca volvulus = 33, Loa loa = 150, Mansonella perstans = 130, unspecified species = 8). Diagnosis was confirmed in 213/320 (67%) patients. European long-term travelers accounted for 166 patients (52%) and visitors/migrants from tropical countries for another 110 (34%). Central Africa was the likely region of acquisition for 294 (92%) patients. The number of filariasis cases decreased from 21.5/year on average in the 1990s to 6.3/year in the past decade, when loiasis became predominant. Cases reported symptoms in >80% of all filarial infections but mansonellosis (45/123 single infections; 37%). Lymphatic filariasis and onchocerciasis cases responded well to conventional therapy. However, 30% of patients with loiasis and mansonellosis experienced treatment failure (with diethylcarbamazine and levamisole-mebendazole, respectively). Conclusions The burden and species distribution of filariasis in travelers evolved in the past decades. Most presentations were symptomatic. Case management would benefit from more effective therapies for loiasis and mansonellosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Diagnosis of schistosomiasis remains elusive soon after infection. We evaluated several diagnostic methods in a cluster of travelers with simultaneous freshwater exposure in South Africa. Methods Eosinophil count, schistosome antibody tests, stool and urine microscopy, and serum Dra1 PCR assays were performed at weeks 4–5 (early symptomatic phase), 7–8 (praziquantel treatment), and 13–14 (after treatment). Sequencing was done on serum samples from 3 patients to identify the species. Results Of the 34 travelers (16 adults and 18 children), 32 developed symptoms 2–6 weeks after exposure. A raised eosinophil count (>750/µL) was seen in 12 of 33 at weeks 4–5, and in 22 of 34 at weeks 7–8. Schistosoma antibodies were detected in 3 of 33 at weeks 4–5 and in 12 of 34 at weeks 7–8 and weeks 13–14. The Dra1 PCR result was positive in 24 of 33 travelers at weeks 4–5, in 31 of 34 at weeks 7–8, in 25 of 34 at weeks 13–14, and at least once in all. Ova were absent in all urine and stool samples obtained. Sequencing identified Schistosoma mattheei nuclear and Schistosoma haematobium mitochondrial DNA, indicative of a hybrid species. Conclusions The Dra1 PCR confirmed the diagnosis in all exposed travelers at a much earlier stage than conventional tests. The causative species is probably an S. mattheei × S. haematobium hybrid. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Effective and safe single-visit rabies vaccination for pre- and postexposure prophylaxis (PrEP and PEP) could substantially simplify rabies prevention and therefore increase compliance. Methods In a comparative trial, 303 healthy adults received a primary vaccination that consisted of 2 intradermal (ID) doses of 0.1 mL of the purified chicken embryo cell vaccine (PCEV) during a single visit. One year later, participants were randomly assigned to receive either 4 or 2 ID PEP booster doses of 0.1 mL PCEV during a single visit. The primary endpoint for immunogenicity was the percentage of participants with an adequate antibody level (>0.5 IU/mL) 7 days after the booster doses. The safety endpoint was the proportion of participants who developed adverse events (AEs) following primary and/or booster vaccination. Results All participants, except 1 (99.3%) in each study group, had a rabies antibody titer >0.5 IU/mL on day 7 following the booster schedules. Participants exposed to the 4-dose PEP schedule had a geometric mean titer of 20 IU/mL vs 14 IU/mL for the 2-dose PEP schedule (P =.0228). Local reactions at the injection site following PrEP and PEP were mild and transient and only seen in 14.9% and 49.6%–53% of the participants, respectively. No serious AEs were reported. Conclusions In healthy adults, a 2-dose (2 × 0.1 mL) single-visit ID PEP schedule was as immunologically adequate and safe as a 4-dose (4 × 0.1 mL) single-visit PEP schedule 7 to 28 months following a 2-dose (2 × 0.1 mL) single-visit ID PREP. Clinical Trials Registration EudraCT 2014-00183612. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The existing 4-week preexposure rabies vaccination schedule is costly and often not practicable. Shorter effective schedules would result in wider acceptance. Methods We conducted a noninferiority trial in 500 healthy adults comparing the safety and immunogenicity of a 2-visit (days 0 and 7) intradermal (ID) primary vaccination (2 doses of 0.1 mL ID of the human diploid cell culture rabies vaccine [HDCV] at days 0 and 7) vs a standard 3-visit schedule (single dose of 0.1 mL ID at days 0, 7, and 28). One year to 3 years after primary vaccination, a single booster dose of 0.1 mL ID of HDCV was given to evaluate the anamnestic rabies antibody response. The primary endpoint for immunogenicity was the percentage of subjects with an adequate antibody level >0.5 IU/mL 7 days after the booster injection. The safety endpoint was the proportion of participants developing adverse reactions following the primary vaccination and/or booster dose. Results All subjects in both study groups possessed a rabies antibody titer >0.5 IU/mL on day 7 following the booster dose. Following the booster dose, subjects exposed to the double-dose 2-visit ID schedule had a geometric mean titer of 37 IU/mL, compared with 25 IU/mL for the single-dose 3-visit schedule (P <.001). Local reactions at the injection site following primary vaccination were mild and transient. Conclusions In healthy adults, ID administration of a double dose of 0.1 mL of HDCV over 2 visits (days 0 and 7) was safe and not inferior to the single-dose 3-visit schedule. Clinical Trials Registration NCT01388985, EudraCT 2011-001612-62. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]