Search

Introduction To describe the efficacy of infigratinib, a potent, selective fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 1-3 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, across lines of therapy (LOT) in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC). Patients and Methods Eligible patients had mUC and prior platinum-based chemotherapy, unless contraindicated, and activating FGFR3 mutation/fusion. Patients received infigratinib 125 mg orally daily (3 weeks on/1 week off) in a single-arm, open-label study. Primary endpoint: investigator-assessed confirmed objective response rate (ORR). Disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), best overall response (BOR) that included unconfirmed responses, and overall survival (OS) were also assessed. Subgroup analysis of efficacy and safety outcomes by LOT was performed. Results Sixty-seven patients were enrolled; 13 (19.4%) received infigratinib as early-line therapy for mUC due to ineligibility to receive platinum-based chemotherapy. Overall, ORR was 25.4% (95% CI 15.5-37.5) and DCR was 64.2% (95% CI 51.5-75.5). ORR was 30.8% (95% CI 9.1-61.4) with early-line infigratinib and 24.1% (95% CI 13.5-37.6) for ≥2 LOT. DCR was 46.2% (95% CI 19.2-74.9) for early-line and 68.5% (95% CI 54.4-80.5) for ≥2 LOT. PFS and OS appeared similar in both groups. Thirteen of 59 patients with a bladder primary tumor received early-line treatment with an ORR of 30.5% (95% CI 9.1-61.4), and 46 received ≥2 LOT with an ORR of 20.3% (95% CI 9.4-33.9); BOR was 38.5% (95% CI: 13.9-68.4%) and 42.6% (95% CI: 29.2-56.8%) in the early-line and salvage settings, respectively. Eight patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma received salvage therapy (ORR, 50.0%; DCR, 100.0%). No significant differences in toxicities between LOT were observed. Conclusion Infigratinib has notable activity in patients with mUC regardless of LOT. The findings support the evaluation of infigratinib across different settings in mUC.

Purpose Tumor genomic profiling helps direct therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). In the course of clinical care, we encountered a patient with a complete loss of SMARCB1 (switch/sucrose nonfermentable-related matrix-associated actin-dependent regulator of chromatin subfamily B member 1), which encodes INI-1 (integrase interactor 1), as the sole detected driver of their urinary tract tumor. Our objective was the identification and genomic characterization of urinary tract neoplasia with complete SMARCB1 loss. Patients and Methods Tissue from 1287 patients with UC was assayed by hybrid capture-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) in the course of clinical care to evaluate genomic alterations (GA), such as, base substitutions, insertions/deletions, amplifications, copy number alterations, fusions/rearrangements, and targeted therapy opportunities. A total of 315 genes frequently altered in cancer were assayed. Results CGP identified 10 patients with SMARCB1 alterations. Of the 10 patients, 4 (1 each with renal pelvis, ureter, bladder, and unknown primary cancer) had complete loss of SMARCB1 , and 6 had loss of heterozygosity with an unknown effect on function or heterozygous loss. Patients with complete SMARCB1 loss had few or no additional alterations. Compared with conventional UC, the tumor mutational burden was significantly lower ( P = .004). All 4 patients with complete SMARCB1-loss tumors were Conclusion The genomic profiles of the tumors from patients with UC revealed a population of tumors driven by complete loss of SMARCB1 . This previously uncharacterized subset of INI-1–deficient urinary tract tumors might constitute a new tumor category that could be sensitive to targeted therapy, including EZH2 (enhancer of zeste homolog 2) inhibition. Clinical trial testing could be challenging owing to the rarity of the disease.

Background Abiraterone acetate has been approved for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Coadministration with prednisone has been recommended to prevent the toxicity from secondary mineralocorticoid excess, such as hypertension, hypokalemia, and edema. However, the use of prednisone is often not desired by patients because of the potential for detrimental effects of long-term therapy with corticosteroids, especially in those with comorbidities such as diabetes or who have received previous immunotherapeutic agents. Eplerenone is a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid antagonist demonstrated to abrogate mineralocorticoid excess. In the present retrospective study, we report our real-world experience with the use of eplerenone with abiraterone in men with mCRPC who wished to avoid concomitant prednisone therapy. Patients and Methods The incidence and grade (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4) of mineralocorticoid excess toxicities, baseline demographics, disease characteristics, and progression-free survival (PFS) were collected retrospectively. The patient population included men with mCRPC treated with abiraterone, who were not willing to receive corticosteroids, and thus received eplerenone. Their data were compared with the data from those treated with abiraterone and prednisone during the same period. Continuous variables were assessed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test or Student t test, and categorical variables were assessed using Fischer's exact test or χ 2 test, as appropriate. PFS was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Of the 106 men treated with abiraterone, 40 received eplerenone and 66 received prednisone. The baseline and disease characteristics, incidence and grade of adverse events related to the syndrome of mineralocorticoid excess, and the median PFS were similar in both cohorts. Conclusion In a real-world population of men with mCRPC treated with abiraterone, corticosteroids can be avoided by concomitant treatment with eplerenone. These data require further validation.