1. Preoperative Staging With 11 C-Choline PET/CT Is Adequately Accurate in Patients With Very High-Risk Prostate Cancer.
- Author
-
Schiavina R, Bianchi L, Mineo Bianchi F, Borghesi M, Pultrone CV, Dababneh H, Castellucci P, Ceci F, Nanni C, Gaudiano C, Fiorentino M, Porreca A, Chessa F, Minervini A, Fanti S, and Brunocilla E
- Subjects
- Aged, Carbon Radioisotopes chemistry, Choline chemistry, Humans, Lymph Node Excision, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Preoperative Period, Prostatectomy, Prostatic Neoplasms pathology, Prostatic Neoplasms surgery, Radiopharmaceuticals chemistry, Retrospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Choline administration & dosage, Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography methods, Prostatic Neoplasms diagnostic imaging, Radiopharmaceuticals administration & dosage
- Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of
11 C-choline positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) for nodal staging of prostate cancer (PCa) in different populations of high-risk patients., Patients and Methods: We evaluated 262 individuals with intermediate- or high-risk PCa submitted to radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection. Within men with high-risk disease, we identified a subgroup of individuals harboring very high-risk (VHR, n = 28) disease: clinical stage ≥ T2c and more than 5 cores with Gleason score 8-10; primary biopsy Gleason score of 5; 3 high-risk features; or prostate-specific antigen ≥ 30 ng/mL. The diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) was assessed after stratifying patients according to risk group classification on a patient- and anatomic region-based analysis., Results: On patient-based analysis, considering high-risk patients (n = 155),11 C-choline PET/CT versus CECT had sensitivity and specificity of 50% and 76% versus 21% and 92%, respectively. Considering VHR men as separate subgroups (n = 28),11 C-choline PET/CT versus CECT had sensitivity and specificity of 71% and 93% versus 25% and 79%, respectively. Accordingly, in the VHR category, the area under the curve of11 C-choline PET/CT versus CECT was 0.86 (95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.0) versus 0.69 (95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.86), respectively. On anatomic region-based analysis, considering the VHR group,11 C-choline PET/CT versus CECT had sensitivity and specificity of 70.6% and 95.5% versus 35.3% and 98.5%, respectively., Conclusion: Patients with VHR characteristics could represent the ideal candidate to undergo disease staging with PET/CT before surgery with the highest cost efficacy., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF