Search

A 12.5-year-old male patient with a de novo derivative chromosome 22 is reported. A detailed description of the clinical features and comparison with the results of conventional cytogenetic banding methods indicated that the derivative chromosome might have been caused by a translocation between the short arms of chromosomes 12 and 22: der(22)t(12;22)(p12.1;p11.2). Fluorescence in situ hybridization with a chromosome 12-specific paint confirmed this supposition. The patient thus carries a pure duplication of 12pter-->p12.1. The phenotype of the patient described is compared to cases in the literature.

This report concerns two patients with clinical features typical for tetrasomy 18p syndrome. Chromosomal analysis revealed a male karyotype in both cases, with an additional small metacentric marker chromosome, putatively an i(18p). Fluorescent in situ hybridization with a chromosome 18-specific paint confirmed that the marker chromosome consisted of chromosome 18 material in both cases.

We report on a male patient with a de novo derivative chromosome 9. From clinical and conventional cytogenetic data, it was assumed that the derivative chromosome might be caused by a translocation between the short arms of chromosomes 7 and 9: der(9)t(7;9)(p21.2;p23.5). Fluorescence in situ hybridization with a chromosome 7-specific and a chromosome 9-specific paint confirmed this supposition. The phenotype of the patient described is compared to cases in the literature.

Voiculescu I, Toder R, Back E, Osswald P, Schempp W. A retrospective CISS hybridization analysis of a case with de novo translocation t(18;22) resulting in an 18p—syndrome. Clin Genet 1993: 43: 318–320. © Munksgaard, 1993 An unbalanced de novo translocation t(18;22) leading to a severely malformed liveborn girl with 18p—syndrome is described. Using the chromosomal in situ suppression (CISS) hybridization technique on 4-year-old G-banded chromosome preparations, it could be demonstrated that the translocation chromosome is composed of the long arm including the centromere of a chromosome 22 and the long arm of a chromosome 18. Consequently, the patient described here has lost the short arm including the centromere of chromosome 18. The possibility of restudying cytogen-etically unsolved cases in clinical cytogenetics using older G-banded chromosome preparations with the fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques is pointed out.