Search

Genetic counseling and testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer now includes practitioners from multiple healthcare professions, specialties, and settings. This study examined whether non-genetics professionals (NGPs), perform guideline-based patient intake and informed consent before genetic testing. NGPs offering BRCA testing services in Florida (n = 386) were surveyed about clinical practices. Among 81 respondents (response rate = 22%), approximately half reported: sometimes scheduling a separate session for pretest counseling lasting 11–30 minutes prior to testing, discussing familial implications of testing, benefits and limitations of risk management options, and discussing the potential psychological impact and insurance related issues. Few constructed a three-generation pedigree, discussed alternative hereditary cancer syndromes, or the meaning of a variant result. This lack of adherence to guideline based practice may result in direct harm to the patients and their family members. NGPs that are unable to deliver guideline adherent cancer genetics services should focus on identification and referral of at-risk patients to in person or telephone services provided by genetics professionals.

Next-generation sequencing enables testing for multiple genes simultaneously (‘panel-based testing’) as opposed to sequential testing for one inherited condition at a time (‘syndrome-based testing’). This study presents results from patients who underwent hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) panel-based testing (‘ColoNext™’). De-identified data from a clinical testing laboratory were used to calculate (1) frequencies for patient demographic, clinical, and family history variables and (2) rates of pathogenic mutations and variants of uncertain significance (VUS). The proportion of individuals with a pathogenic mutation who met national syndrome-based testing criteria was also determined. Of 586 patients, a pathogenic mutation was identified in 10.4%, while 20.1% had at least one VUS. After removing eight patients with CHEK2 mutations and 11 MUTYH heterozygotes, the percentage of patients with ‘actionable’ mutations that would clearly alter cancer screening recommendations per national guidelines decreased to 7.2%. Of 42 patients with an ‘actionable’ result, 30 (71%) clearly met established syndrome-based testing guidelines. This descriptive study is among the first to report on a large clinical series of patients undergoing panel-based testing for inherited CRC. Results are discussed in the context of benefits and concerns that have been raised about panel-based testing implementation. Conflict of interest Cristi Radford and Jill Dolinsky are full-time employees for the commercial laboratory Ambry Genetics, which performs ColoNext™ testing. Elizabeth Chao is a paid consultant for Ambry. Deborah Cragun, Meghan Caldwell, and Tuya Pal report no potential conflicts of interest. Specifically, they are not employed by Ambry, and they did not receive any financial or other incentives from Ambry.

BRCA testing services are now offered by various healthcare providers, thus it is important to evaluate whether the implementation of cancer risk management (CRM) strategies varies by service provider. Using a registry-based sample of 795 female BRCA mutation carriers, we explored the association between uptake of CRM strategies with duration of genetic counseling (GC) sessions, provider type, and other demographic and clinical variables. All participants completed a baseline questionnaire. Information about uptake of CRM strategies was collected for a subset of 438 participants who completed additional questions. Summary statistics and Pearson chi-squared analysis were used to examine the associations between demographic and clinical variables with service delivery factors and with the uptake of various CRM strategies. Overall uptake of CRM strategies was high across all provider types. However, GC sessions were longer when provided by a genetics professional than by another provider (p

Pal T, Stowe C, Cole A, Lee J-H, Zhao X, Vadaparampil S. Evaluation of phone-based genetic counselling in African American women using culturally tailored visual aids. Genetic counselling (GC) services for inherited breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) are underutilized by African American (AA) women. We sought to evaluate factors associated with knowledge gain in a sample of AA women diagnosed with early-onset breast cancer, in whom GC for HBOC was provided, using a culturally targeted genetic counselling aid (GCA). Through a cancer registry-based study, phone-based GC for HBOC was offered to AA women with breast cancer ≤50. A questionnaire to assess knowledge about HBOC was completed prior to GC. All women were provided a GCA about HBOC developed by the investigative team for use during the GC session. Following GC, a personalized summary letter was mailed to all study participants and the same knowledge questionnaire was completed. A total of 37 study participants completed the pre- and post-GC knowledge questionnaires with significant gains in knowledge following the GC process (p < 0.0001). Statistically significant factors associated with knowledge gain included earlier stage of diagnosis of breast cancer and education level. Our results indicate that phone-based GC supplemented by a culturally targeted visual aid is an effective means of improving knowledge about HBOC in young AA women with invasive breast cancer.

Cleidocranial dysplasia (CCD) is typically an autosomal dominant condition. The possibility of alternative causes, such as an autosomal recessive form or germ line mosaicism, have been suggested in some families with CCD, but not proven. We present a family consisting of a mother having three sons affected with CCD. One of the affected boys is a half brother to the other two affected children. The diagnosis of CCD was confirmed by DNA analysis of the RUNX2 gene in all three of the boys in blood; however, initial DNA testing in the mother's blood did not detect the presence of a RUNX2 mutation in the mother. Further testing through heteroduplex analysis applying high-resolution melting analysis followed by subcloning detected low-level mosaicism in DNA isolated from maternal blood and buccal swab, confirming low-level mosaicism in somatic cells. We present the first case of confirmed germ line mosaicism in CCD.