Search

Single‐nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)‐based non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) can currently predict a subset of submicroscopic abnormalities associated with severe clinical manifestations. We retrospectively analyzed the performance of SNP‐based NIPT in 80 449 referrals for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome and 42 326 referrals for 1p36, cri‐du‐chat, Prader‐Willi, and Angelman microdeletion syndromes over a 1‐year period, and compared the original screening protocol with a revision that reflexively sequenced high‐risk calls at a higher depth of read. The prevalence of these microdeletion syndromes was also estimated in the referral population. The positive predictive value of the original test was 15.7% for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome, and 5.2% for the other 4 disorders combined. With the revised protocol, these values increased to 44.2% for 22q11.2 and 31.7% for the others. The 0.33% false‐positive rate (FPR) for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome decreased to 0.07% with the revised protocol. Similarly, the FPR for the other 4 disorders combined decreased from 0.56% to 0.07%. Minimal prevalences were estimated to be 1 in 1255 for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome and 1 in 1464 for 1p36, cri‐du‐chat, and Angelman syndromes combined. Our results show that these microdeletions are relatively common in the referral population, and that the performance of SNP‐based NIPT is improved with high‐depth resequencing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The practice of prenatal screening is undergoing important changes as a result of the introduction of genomic testing technologies at different stages of the screening trajectory. It is expected that eventually it will become possible to routinely obtain a comprehensive 'genome scan' of all fetuses. Although this will still take several years, there are clear continuities between present developments and this future scenario. As this review shows, behind the still limited scope of screening for common aneuploidies, a rapid widening of the range of conditions tested for is already taking shape at the invasive testing stage. But the continuities are not just technical; they are also ethical. If screening for Down's syndrome is a matter of providing autonomous reproductive choice, then why would providing the choice to have a full fetal genome scan be something entirely different? There is a clear need for a sustainable normative framework that will have to answer three challenges: the indeterminateness of the autonomy paradigm, the need to acknowledge the future child as an interested stakeholder, and the prospect of broad-scope genomic prenatal screening with a double purpose: autonomy and prevention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The goal of thalassemia screening is the identification, prior to the conception or birth of an affected child, of couples where both partners are thalassemia carriers. When both partners are identified as carriers for alpha- or beta-thalassemia, the risk of having a fetus who is homozygous or compound heterozygous for the abnormal gene is 25%. A study was performed to identify whether routine screening for thalassemia is indicated for the Chinese population in British Columbia (BC). In a population of 783 subjects, studied either prospectively or retrospectively, 5.0% were alpha-thalassemia carriers and 1.7% were beta-thalassemia carriers.In addition, a review of all BC cases of prenatal diagnosis for thalassemia over a 6-year period indicated that 26% of couples were identified as alpha-thalassemia carriers because of a second or third trimester diagnosis of fetal hydrops, and 17% of couples referred for beta-thalassemia already had an affected child. The experience with prenatal diagnosis shows that a significant proportion of at-risk couples are not identified prior to or early in a pregnancy. The prevalence of carriers for thalassemia would warrant a program of education and routine screening for this condition in the BC Asian population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]