Search

Background and Aim: It is well established that cancer patients have an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, no previous study has examined the quality of VTE diagnoses related to cancer patients in the Danish National Registry of Patients (DNRP). To support future studies on cancer and risk of VTE, this study aimed to estimate the positive predictive value (PPV) of VTE diagnoses among prostate cancer (PC) patients registered in the DNRP., Materials and Methods: We conducted a validation study using data from hospitals within the Central Denmark Region, which covers a population of 1.3 million people. Using the DNRP, we identified a total of 120 PC patients registered with VTE within the period 1995-2012. We also identified a random sample of 120 PC patients with no VTE registration within the same period. Therefore, a total of 240 patients were selected for medical chart review. We compared data from the DNRP to data collected from medical record review (ie, reference standard). We then computed PPV, sensitivity, and specificity with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using the Jeffreys method., Results: The final study sample included 232 PC patients, of which 115 were registered with VTE and 117 had no registration of VTE in the DNRP. We found the overall PPV of VTE diagnoses in the DNRP to be 86.1% (95% CI 78.9%-91.5%). Sensitivity was 98.0% (95% CI 93.8%-99.6%), and specificity was 87.8% (95% CI 81.4%-92.6%). We also found the PPV of incident PC diagnoses in the DNRP to be 98.3% (95% CI 96.1%-99.4%)., Conclusion: For PC patients, the registration of VTE diagnoses in the DNRP is associated with a high PPV. We provide evidence that data from the DNRP are valid for studies on risk of VTE among cancer patients.

Background: The Danish National Registry of Patients (DNRP) is a potentially valuable resource for monitoring national trends in the use of chemotherapy and evaluating the benefits and harms of alternative treatments among colorectal cancer (CRC) patients in Denmark. However, the validity of chemotherapy reporting in the DNRP is unknown. In this study, we evaluated the validity of the DNRP for identifying the receipt of chemotherapy and specific treatments, and the timing and number of treatments among CRC patients, using medical records and pharmacy data as the reference standard., Methods: We selected a random sample of CRC patients with lymph node involvement who were diagnosed at Aarhus University Hospital (n = 25) or Aalborg University Hospital (n = 25) from 2009 to 2010. Administration dates, specific treatments, and number of treatment courses were abstracted for the 180 days post diagnosis from the DNRP, medical records, and pharmacy production databases. The prevalence of chemotherapy, timing of first administration, and number of courses were described. DNRP data were compared with the reference standard for each hospital, and the kappa, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for the receipt of any chemotherapy and specific treatments., Results: The prevalence of chemotherapy was 72% and 68% among CRC patients treated in Aarhus and Aalborg, respectively, with >90% of patients without distant metastasis receiving treatment within 90 days from diagnosis. Patients received on average 4.6 and 4.7 treatment courses in Aarhus and Aalborg, respectively. Kappa, sensitivity, and specificity of chemotherapy reporting in the DNRP was high (≥0.88), but the sensitivity of individual chemotherapies varied by hospital., Conclusion: The validity of chemotherapy reporting in the DNRP was high, although some variation by hospital exists. The DNRP represents a population-based nationwide resource that can be used to provide timely and accurate evaluations of chemotherapy use among CRC patients in Denmark.

Objective: Primary liver cancer (PLC) is a serious disease with high mortality. During the last decade, improvements in the diagnostic procedures and treatment of PLC may have improved survival. However, few updated longitudinal studies examined this issue. In a population-based setting, we studied changes in the prognoses over time., Methods: Between 1998 and 2009, we identified all patients with PLC in the central and northern Denmark regions, with a combined population of 1.8 million. We determined age- and period-stratified survival, and computed mortality rate ratios (MRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), using Cox proportional hazard regression to assess changes over time, while controlling for age and gender. We conducted the analyses for PLC overall and separately for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma, respectively., Results: We included 1064 patients with PLC. Their median age was 69 years (range 17-94 years). The number of patients diagnosed with PLC in the period 2007-2009 was approximately 40% higher than the number in 1998-2000. One-year survival increased from 16% in 1998-2000 to 28% in 2007-2009, corresponding to an adjusted 1-year MRR of 0.65 (95% CI: 0.54-0.79). In patients aged <60 years, we found the most pronounced increase in 1-year survival, from 14% to 49% in women and from 19% to 41% in men. The 3- and 5-year survival in the entire cohort increased from 5% to a predicted 11% and from 2% to a predicted 7% during our study period, respectively. Accordingly, the expected 3- and 5-year adjusted MRRs were 0.68 (95% CI: 0.57-0.82) and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.57-0.81), respectively. One-, 3-, and 5-year survival improved during the study period for both HCC and cholangiocarcinoma., Conclusion: PLC survival remains poor in the Danish population, although we observed an increase over the period 1998-2009, particularly in young people.

Objective: In Denmark, the strategy for treatment of cancer with metastases to the liver has changed dramatically during the period 1998 to 2009, when multidisciplinary care and a number of new treatments were introduced. We therefore examined the changes in survival in Danish patients with colorectal carcinoma (CRC) or other solid tumors (non-CRC) who had liver metastases at time of diagnosis., Study Design and Methods: We included patients diagnosed with liver metastases synchronous with a primary cancer (ie, a solid cancer diagnosed at the same date or within 60 days after liver metastasis diagnosis) during the period 1998 to 2009 identified through the Danish National Registry of Patients. We followed those who survived for more than 60 days in a survival analysis (n = 1021). Survival and mortality rate ratio (MRR) at 1, 3, and 5 years stratified by year of diagnosis were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis., Results: In the total study population of 1021 patients, 541 patients had a primary CRC and 480 patients non-CRC. Overall, the 5-year survival improved from 3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1%-6%) in 1998-2000 to 10% (95% CI: 6%-14%) in 2007 to 2009 (predicted value). The 5-year survival for CRC-patients improved from 1% (95% CI: 0%-5%) to 11% (95% CI: 6%-18%) whereas survival for non-CRC patients only increased from 5% (95% CI: 1%-10%) to 8% (95% CI: 4%-14%)., Conclusion: We observed improved survival in patients with liver metastases in a time period characterized by introduction of a structured multidisciplinary care and improved treatment options. The survival gain was most prominent for CRC-patients.