Search

Background: High neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a poor prognostic factor in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Here we provide final results of CAVE mCRC trial, of cetuximab plus avelumab rechallenge in chemo-refractory mCRC patients and investigated the predictive role of NLR., Methods: All the 77 patients enrolled were included in the analysis. A cut-off of 3 was used to correlate baseline NLR with with overall survival (OS) and with progression free survival (PFS), in intention to treat (ITT) and in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) RAS/BRAF Wild Type (WT) patients., Results: In ITT population, NLR <3 (49%) group had median overall survival (mOS) of 17.8 months, vs. 8.9 months in NLR ≥ 3 group (51%) [HR 0.50, (CI 95% 0.3-0.8), P = .006]. Median progression free survival (mPFS) was 3.9 months in NLR <3 group and 3.5 months in NLR≥3 [HR 0.79, (CI 95% 0.5-1.24), P = .3]. In ctDNA RAS/BRAF WT population, mOS was 22 months in NLR <3 group (48%), vs. 8.9 months in NLR ≥3 group (52%), [HR 0.38, (CI 95% 0.19-0.75), P = .005]. A trend towards increased mPFS was observed in patients with NLR <3 versus NLR ≥3: 5.3 vs. 3.6 months [HR: 0.79, (CI 95% 0.44-1.4), P = .43]. In contrast, NLR did not correlate either with PFS or OS in ctDNA RAS/BRAF mutated patients., Conclusion: In the exploratory analysis of the CAVE mCRC trial, baseline NLR <3 significantly correlated with improved survival and may represent a potential predictive biomarker of cetuximab plus avelumab rechallenge activity in ctDNA RAS/BRAF WT patients, that must be confirmed in randomized studies., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: There have been significant developments in colorectal cancer (CRC) research over the last few years, with the introduction of new agents that have been prolonged median overall survival of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). These therapies have improved patient outcomes; however, despite significant progress in strategies for cancer treatment, their use is limited by development of resistant mechanism. Almost 30% of patients with refractory mCRC will remain good candidates for further treatment. Regorafenib and TAS-102 are novel antitumor agents for patients with refractory mCRC. However, it is unclear which patients may derive a survival benefit from these drugs in real-life clinical practice., Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis evaluating safety and efficacy of TAS-102 and regorafenib in a cohort of refractory mCRC patients, in 3 different centers between January 1 2018 and May 31 2020, with the aim of assessing the optimal sequence treatment for these 2 drugs., Results: One hundred and forty mCRC patients were included in the analysis. Of these patients, 64 received regorafenib and 76 received TAS-102 as first treatment. After progression, in the regorafenib 24 (37%) patients switched to secondary treatment with TAS-102, instead, in the TAS-102 group, among 76 patients, 29 (45%) patients switched to secondary treatment with regorafenib. Disease control was achieved in 8 (12.5%) of 64 patients in the regorafenib group and 17 (22.4%) of 76 patients in the TAS-102 group. In terms of efficacy, the PFS and OS were similar in both treatment groups for primary and secondary treatments. AEs reported in this analysis were mostly consistent with the known safety profiles of regorafenib and TAS-102 in previous clinical trials., Conclusion: The present study is the first one to compare the activity of the two agents in a large cohort of chemo-refractory mCRC patients providing more details about the best sequence, to be incorporated in clinical practice., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)