Search

To determine whether alterations of left ventricular (LV) structure are associated with improved LV function under chronic clonidine monotherapy (300-450 g/day) of essential hypertension, 11 male patients (age range 47-61 years) were followed for 5.4 +/- 0.9 months using echocardiography and Doppler echocardiography. Blood pressure decreased from a mean of 168/105 to 150/96 mmHg (p less than 0.01), heart rate remained unchanged (73 +/- 10 vs. 71 +/- 10 beats/min). LV muscle mass decreased from 350 +/- 73 to 297 +/- 56 g (p less than 0.02), LV volume/muscle mass ratio increased from 0.58 +/- 0.13 to 0.69 +/- 0.12 ml/g (p less than 0.005). Ejection time increased from 276 +/- 17 to 296 +/- 17 ms (p less than 0.01), whereas no significant change was found for pre-ejection period, ejection fraction, cardiac index and LV dimensions. Doppler analysis revealed improved isovolumic relaxation time (116 +/- 17 vs. 84 +/- 28 ms; p less than 0.05), but no change in isovolumic contraction duration, maximal inflow velocities, time-velocity integrals and their duration, rate of acceleration and deceleration of early and atrial filling, and of their ratios. It is concluded that no reliable improvement in diastolic or systolic LV function is observed in chronic clonidine monotherapy of essential hypertension despite a normalization of blood pressure and a regression of LV hypertrophy.

BACKGROUND Tedisamil is a new bradycardic agent proven to exert anti-ischemic and antiarrhythmic effects by blockade of the different cardiac and vascular K+ currents. HYPOTHESIS It was the aim of the present study to compare the favorable anti-ischemic effects of tedisamil, with two long established representatives in the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD), namely, the beta1 blocker esmolol and the Ca2 antagonist gallopamil. METHODS The hemodynamic and neurohumoral effects of the new potassium channel blocker tedisamil, an agent with negative chronotropic and class III antiarrhythmic properties, were compared with the ultra-short-acting beta1-selective adrenoceptor blocker esmolol and the calcium antagonist gallopamil. A total of 22 patients with angiographically proven CAD and reproducible ST-segment depression in the exercise electrocardiogram was included in two studies with an almost identical design and inclusion criteria. The investigation was carried out using right heart catheterization and bicycle ergometry. A subgroup of 8 patients receiving 0.3 mg/kg body weight tedisamil intravenously (i.v.) in an open dose-finding study was compared with a group of 14 patients who had received esmolol (i.v. bolus of 500 micrograms/kg, maintenance dose 200 micrograms/kg/min) and gallopamil (initial dose 0.025 mg/kg, maintenance dose 0.0005 mg/kg/h) in a second intraindividual comparison. RESULTS Tedisamil and esmolol reduced heart rate at rest by 13% (p < 0.001), and 6% (p < 0.05), and at maximum working levels by 8% (p < 0.01) and 9% (p < 0.05), respectively. Gallopamil increased heart rate at rest by 7% (p < 0.05), with only slight changes occurring during exercise. Corresponding findings for each drug were observed for cardiac output both at rest and during exercise [tedisamil: at rest -10% (NS), max. exercise -8%; esmolol: at rest -14% (NS), max. exercise -18% (NS); gallopamil: no significant changes]. Compared with tedisamil, stroke volume was reduced by esmolol [at rest and max. workload: -9% (NS)] and gallopamil [rest: -6% (NS), max. exercise: -2% (NS)]. Of the indirect parameters of ventricular function, that is, mean capillary wedge pressure (PCWPm) and right ventricular ejection fraction, only PCWPm demonstrated significant differences between tedisamil and gallopamil (+18% and -6% at rest, +17% and -21% during exercise, respectively; p < 0.001). Compared with gallopamil, both tedisamil and esmolol were superior in their effects on rate-pressure product, myocardial oxygen consumption, and ST-segment depression, whereas plasma lactate concentration was more reduced by tedisamil and gallopamil. Tedisamil led to a fall in norepinephrine levels in particular. CONCLUSION Tedisamil and esmolol showed almost equipotent anti-ischemic effects at the doses administered. Tedisamil acts mainly by reductions in heart rate, and esmolol, though to a lesser degree, also by reductions in systolic blood pressure. The mechanism of gallopamil is to reduce afterload and to improve coronary perfusion. At the doses applied, however, it has lower antianginal potency compared with tedisamil and esmolol.

To determine whether ajmaline (A) can be safely applied in coronary artery disease (CAD), changes of left ventricular (LV) function after acute ajmaline application were analyzed by pulsed Doppler echocardiography in 10 CAD patients. LV pressures in systole and end-diastole and LVEF remained normal and comparable. Doppler normalized peak filling rate (p less than 0.02), peak early/atrial filling velocity (E/A) ratio (p less than 0.01) and E-deceleration (p less than 0.05) increased. The increase in E/A and in E-deceleration relative to base values was directly correlated (p less than 0.001). PEP increased, LVET remained unchanged. LV diastolic filling is improved after acute application of ajmaline in patients with CAD and normal systolic function; its application may be advised not only for therapy of arrhythmia but also to improve left ventricular diastolic mechanics in these patients.

The evidence of subendocardial ischemia was studied during isoproterenol stress in seven patients with aortic valve disease before (group A) and approximately 6 months after Bjork-Shiley valvular replacement (group B), in seven patients with coronary artery disease (group C), and in seven patients without heart disease (group D). Ejection fraction, thermodilution coronary sinus flow, and lactate metabolism were determined at rest and during isoproterenol stress. Potential subendocardial blood supply was estimated from a diastolic pressure-time index (DPTI), calculated from aortic and left ventricular pressure curves, and oxygen demand, estimated from the tension-time index (TTI). The ratio of DPTI/TTI was used to estimate the supply-demand relationship. Impaired left ventricular myocardial function was apparent by a lack of increase of the ejection fraction during stress in groups A and C as compared to controls. After aortic valvular replacement (group B) during stress, an adequate increase of the ejection fraction, a normal stress response of the O2 supply-demand ratio, and a lactate extraction rather than production (all p>0.05) were found. During isoproterenol infusion (at equal heart rates and normal coronary sinus flow) a significant lactate production and decreased O2 supply-demand ratio in group A and C patients were induced, but not in group B and D patients. The more massive lactate production in group A as opposed to group C reflected subendocardial ischemia of the hypertrophic left ventricle as compared to the more regional and nonuniform distribution of ischemic areas in coronary artery disease. The results of this study suggest that ischemia and cardiac failure can be induced by isoproterenol stress in coronary artery disease as well as in hypertrophic myocardium caused by aortic stenosis. Aortic valvular replacement repaired the ischemic response found in aortic valve disease 6 months prior to surgery. Stress-induced lactate production rather than coronary sinus flow changes allow discrimination between ischemic and nonischemic myocardium. A critical DPTI/TTI ratio (≤0.4) indicates ischemia in hypertrophic myocardium caused by aortic valve disease, but this concept does not apply to ischemia caused by coronary artery disease.