Search

Purpose: Resistance to anti-PD1-based immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) remains a problem for the treatment of metastatic melanoma. Tumor cells as well as host myeloid cells can express the immune checkpoint ligand CD155 to regulate immune cell function. However, the effect of tumor CD155 on the immune context of human melanoma has not been well described. This observational study characterizes tumor CD155 ligand expression by metastatic melanoma tumors and correlates results with differences in immune cell features and response to ICB., Experimental Design: Pretreatment tumor specimens, from 155 patients with metastatic melanoma treated with ICB and from 50 patients treated with BRAF/MEK-directed targeted therapy, were assessed for CD155 expression by IHC. Intratumor T-cell features were analyzed using multiplex-immunohistofluorescence for CD8, PD1, and SOX10. Correlations were made between CD155 tumor level and bulk tumor RNA sequencing results, as well as clinical RECIST response and progression-free survival., Results: High pretreatment CD155 tumor levels correlated with high parenchymal PD1 + CD8 + /CD8 + T-cell ratios (PD1 tR ) and poor response to anti-PD1 therapy. In PDL1 negative tumors, high CD155 tumor expression was associated with patients who had poor response to combination anti-PD1/CTLA4 therapy., Conclusions: Our findings are the first to suggest that tumor CD155 supports an increase in the fraction of PD1 + CD8 + T cells in anti-PD1 refractory melanoma tumors and, further, that targeting the CD155 pathway might improve response to anti-PD1 therapy for patients with metastatic melanoma., (©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Cancer immunotherapies utilizing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have demonstrated durable efficacy in a proportion of patients with advanced/metastatic cancers. More recently, the use of ICIs for the adjuvant treatment of patients with surgically resectable melanoma has also demonstrated efficacy by improving relapse-free survival and in the case of ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) also improving overall survival. Although promising, the effective scheduling of surgery and immunotherapy and its duration is not well elucidated. Recent preclinical studies suggest that surgery followed by adjuvant therapy might be suboptimal as compared with an approach in which immunotherapy is applied before surgery (neoadjuvant immunotherapy). Encouraging findings from early-phase clinical trials in melanoma, non-small cell lung carcinoma, and glioblastoma support the idea that neoadjuvant immunotherapy might have improved clinical efficacy over an adjuvant application. In this review, we discuss the existing rationale for the use of neoadjuvant immunotherapy, its apparent strengths and weaknesses, and implications for the design of future clinical trials., (©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: Novel partners for established immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of cancer are needed to address the problems of primary and acquired resistance. The efficacy of combination RANKL and CTLA4 blockade in antitumor immunity has been suggested by recent case reports in melanoma. Here, we provide a rationale for this combination in mouse models of cancer. Experimental Design: The efficacy and mechanism of a combination of RANKL and CTLA4 blockade was examined by tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte analysis, tumor growth, and metastasis using a variety of neutralizing antibodies and gene-targeted mice. Results: RANKL blockade improved the efficacy of anti-CTLA4 mAbs against solid tumors and experimental metastases, with regulatory T-cell (Treg)-depleting anti-CTLA4 mAbs of the mouse IgG2a isotype showing greatest combinatorial activity. The optimal combination depended on the presence of activating Fc receptors and lymphocytes (NK cells for metastatic disease and predominantly CD8 + T cells for subcutaneous tumor control), whereas anti-RANKL alone did not require FcR. The significantly higher T-cell infiltration into solid tumors post anti-RANKL and anti-CTLA4 was accompanied by increased T-cell effector function (cytokine polyfunctionality), and anti-RANKL activity occurred independently of Treg depletion. The majority of RANKL expression in tumors was on T cells whereas RANK-expressing cells were mostly tumor-associated macrophages (TAM), with some expression also observed on dendritic cells (DC) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC). Conclusions: These results provide a rationale for the further investigation of RANKL-RANK interactions in tumor immunity and a basis for development of translational markers of interest in human clinical trials. Clin Cancer Res; 23(19); 5789-801. ©2017 AACR ., (©2017 American Association for Cancer Research.)