1. MET Exon 14–altered Lung Cancers and MET Inhibitor Resistance
- Author
-
Jason C. Chang, Todd Hembrough, Robin Guo, M. Offin, Caroline G. McCarthy, Natasha Rekhtman, Kerry Scott, Ryma Benayed, Deepu Alex, Alex Makhnin, Ahmet Zehir, Mark G. Kris, Fabiola Cecchi, Alexander Drilon, Ronglai Shen, A. Rose Brannon, Paul K. Paik, Bob T. Li, Jeffrey Girshman, Charles M. Rudin, Yuan Tian, Christina Falcon, Lukas Delasos, Olivia Wilkins, Andrew Chow, and Maria E. Arcila
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Oncology ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Mutation ,business.industry ,medicine.disease_cause ,Article ,DNA sequencing ,03 medical and health sciences ,Exon ,030104 developmental biology ,0302 clinical medicine ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Internal medicine ,Gene duplication ,Proteome ,Immunochemistry ,Medicine ,Immunohistochemistry ,business ,Tyrosine kinase - Abstract
Purpose: MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) can achieve modest clinical outcomes in MET exon 14–altered lung cancers, likely secondary to primary resistance. Mechanisms of primary resistance remain poorly characterized and comprehensive proteomic analyses have not previously been performed. Experimental Design: We performed hybrid capture-based DNA sequencing, targeted RNA sequencing, cell-free DNA sequencing, selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry (SRM-MS), and immunohistochemistry on patient samples of MET exon 14–altered lung cancers treated with a MET TKI. Associations between overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and putative genomic alterations and MET protein expression were evaluated. Results: Seventy-five of 168 MET exon 14–altered lung cancers received a MET TKI. Previously undescribed (zygosity, clonality, whole-genome duplication) and known (copy-number focality, tumor mutational burden, mutation region/type) genomic factors were not associated with ORR/PFS (P > 0.05). In contrast, MET expression was associated with MET TKI benefit. Only cases with detectable MET expression by SRM-MS (N = 15) or immunochemistry (N = 22) responded to MET TKI therapy, and cancers with H-score ≥ 200 had a higher PFS than cancers below this cutoff (10.4 vs. 5.5 months, respectively; HR, 3.87; P = 0.02). Conclusions: In MET exon 14–altered cancers treated with a MET TKI, a comprehensive analysis of previously unknown and known genomic factors did not identify a genomic mechanism of primary resistance. Instead, MET expression correlated with benefit, suggesting the potential role of interrogating the proteome in addition to the genome in confirmatory prospective trials.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF