Search

Purpose:Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have poor outcomes and require new therapies. In AML, autocrine production of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) drives MET signaling that promotes myeloblast growth and survival, making MET an attractive therapeutic target. MET inhibition exhibits activity in AML preclinical studies, but HGF upregulation by the FGFR pathway is a common mechanism of resistance.Patients and Methods:We performed preclinical studies followed by a Phase I trial to investigate the safety and biological activity of the MET inhibitor merestinib in combination with the FGFR inhibitor LY2874455 for patients with R/R AML. Study Cohort 1 underwent a safety lead-in to determine a tolerable dose of single-agent merestinib. In Cohort 2, dose-escalation of merestinib and LY2874455 was performed following a 3+3 design. Correlative studies were conducted.Results:The primary dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) observed for merestinib alone or with LY2874455 was reversible grade 3 transaminase elevation, occurring in 2 of 16 patients. Eight patients had stable disease and one achieved complete remission (CR) without measurable residual disease. Although the MTD of combination therapy could not be determined due to drug supply discontinuation, single-agent merestinib administered at 80 mg daily was safe and biologically active. Correlative studies showed therapeutic plasma levels of merestinib, on-target attenuation of MET signaling in leukemic blood, and increased HGF expression in bone marrow aspirate samples of refractory disease.Conclusions:We provide prospective, preliminary evidence that MET and FGFR are biologically active and safely targetable pathways in AML.

Purpose:Checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1) plays a central role in the response to replication stress through modulation of cell-cycle checkpoints and homologous recombination (HR) repair. In BRCA-deficient cancers with de novo or acquired PARP inhibitor resistance, the addition of the CHK1 inhibitor prexasertib to the PARP inhibitor olaparib compromises replication fork stability, as well as HR proficiency, allowing for sensitization to PARP inhibition.Patients and Methods:This study followed a 3+3 design with a 7-day lead-in of olaparib alone, followed by 28-day cycles with prexasertib administered on days 1 and 15 in combination with an attenuated dose of olaparib on days 1–5 and 15–19. Pharmacokinetic blood samples were collected after olaparib alone and following combination therapy. Patients enrolled to the expansion phase of the study underwent paired tumor biopsies for pharmacodynamic (PD) assessments.Results:Twenty-nine patients were treated. DLTs included grade 3 neutropenia and grade 3 febrile neutropenia. The MTD/recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was prexasertib at 70 mg/m2 i.v. with olaparib at 100 mg by mouth twice daily. Most common treatment-related adverse events included leukopenia (83%), neutropenia (86%), thrombocytopenia (66%), and anemia (72%). Four of 18 patients with BRCA1-mutant, PARP inhibitor–resistant, high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) achieved partial responses. Paired tumor biopsies demonstrated reduction in RAD51 foci and increased expression of γ-H2AX, pKAP1, and pRPA after combination exposure.Conclusions:Prexasertib combined with olaparib has preliminary clinical activity in BRCA-mutant patients with HGSOC who have previously progressed on a PARP inhibitor. PD analyses show that prexasertib compromises HR with evidence of induction of DNA damage and replication stress.