Search

Step activity monitors provide insight into the amount of physical activity prosthesis users conduct but not how they use their prosthesis. The purpose of this research was to help fill this void by developing and testing a technology to monitor bodily position and type of activity.Thin inductive distance sensors were adhered to the insides of sockets of a small group of transtibial prosthesis users, two at proximal locations and two at distal locations. An in-lab structured protocol and a semi-structured out-of-lab protocol were video recorded, and then participants wore the sensing system for up to 7 days. A data processing algorithm was developed to identify sit, seated shift, stand, standing weight-shift, walk, partial doff, and non-use. Sensed distance data from the structured and semi-structured protocols were compared against the video data to characterize accuracy. Bodily positions and activities during take-home testing were tabulated to characterize participants' use of the prosthesis.Sit and walk detection accuracies were above 95% for all four participants tested. Stand detection accuracy was above 90% for three participants and 62.5% for one participant. The reduced accuracy may have been due to limited stand data from that participant. Step count was not proportional to active use time (sum of stand, walk, and standing weight-shift times).Step count may provide an incomplete picture of prosthesis use. Larger studies should be pursued to investigate how bodily position and type of activity may facilitate clinical decision-making and improve the lives of people with lower limb amputation.

Background Small intermittent adjustments of socket size using adjustable sockets may be a means for people with transtibial amputation to better maintain residual limb fluid volume and limb position while using a prosthesis. Methods Socket size, limb fluid volume, and distance from the limb to the socket, termed “sensed distance,” were recorded while participants with transtibial amputation walked on a treadmill wearing a motor-driven, cabled-panel, adjustable socket. Researchers made frequent socket size adjustments using a mobile phone app to identify participants' acceptable socket size range. Limb fluid volume and sensed distance were then monitored as incremental adjustments were made to the socket. Findings Prosthesis users in this study (n = 10) accepted socket sizes between −5% and +5% of their neutral socket volume. There was a rapid increase in limb fluid volume and sensed distance upon socket enlargement, and a rapid decrease upon reduction. Subsequently, there were gradual changes in fluid volume and sensed distance. While visually monitoring limb fluid volume data in real time, researchers were able to adjust socket size to maintain consistent limb fluid volume within a −0.7% to +0.9% volume change for 24 min. Interpretation Participant residual limbs compensated to socket size adjustment. Using socket-mounted sensors to monitor limb-socket mechanics, an automatic adjustable socket that maintains limb fluid volume may be possible and may improve socket fit in instances where fit deteriorates during use.

Background Residual limb volume loss is a source of prosthetic socket fit problems in people with lower-limb amputation. The aim of this study was to investigate a novel volume recovery strategy for people with trans-tibial amputation. Methods Test sockets for people with trans-tibial amputation were created that allowed panels of an adjustable socket and the underlying elastomeric liner to be pulled radially outward, using small motors mounted to the socket. One Control and one Intervention session were conducted with each participant. During Intervention sessions, panel-pull was executed during the sits of a multi-cycle sit/walk protocol. No panel-pull was executed during the Control sessions. Residual limb fluid volume was monitored in anterior and posterior regions using bioimpedance analysis. Findings Results from 12 participants demonstrated that short-term (12 min after the intervention was applied) median posterior residual limb fluid volume change for Intervention (0.44%) was higher than that for Control (−0.02%) (P = .015). Long-term (40 min after the intervention was applied) median posterior residual limb fluid volume change for Intervention (0.95%) was higher than that for Control (−0.26%) (P = .002). Interpretation If a panel-pull mechanism that was easy to assemble and operate could be created, then panel-pull may be an effective accommodation strategy to reduce daily limb volume loss in trans-tibial prosthesis users.