Search

Objectives: We assessed the ability of B-type natriuretic peptide signal peptide (BNPsp) to assist with the identification of patients with myocardial infarction (MI) and unstable angina pectoris (UAP)., Design and Methods: We studied 505 patients who presented to hospital within 4h of onset of chest pain suspicious of ACS. Blood samples were drawn at 0, 1, 2 and 24h from presentation and assayed for BNPsp, NT-proBNP, TnI and high sensitivity TnT. The ability of BNPsp and other markers to diagnose acute myocardial infarction (MI) and unstable angina pectoris (UAP) and predict subsequent events within one year was assessed. Statistical analysis was made using ROC AUC in SPSS, v.22., Results: Receiver operator area under the curve (AUC) data for the discrimination of MI was 0.69 for BNPsp and 0.97 for troponin, with BNPsp failing to add to troponin. However, in non-MI patients, BNPsp had discriminative power for UAP (p<0.05), and when combined with presentation values of NT-proBNP, white cell count and potassium into a unique parameter (UARatio), generated an AUC of 0.76 for UAP in patients with normal ECG results (p<0.001). In non-MI patients, the UARatio was significantly predictive of subsequent stroke (AUC=0.70, p<0.05) and heart failure (AUC=0.82, p<0.01) within one year., Conclusions: In patients with chest pain, BNPsp is predictive of MI but is not a useful adjunct to troponin. However, the ability of BNPsp, in conjunction with NT-proBNP and key analytes, to diagnose UAP and other ischemic syndromes merits further investigation., (Copyright © 2016 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: International guidance recommends that early serial sampling of high sensitivity troponin be used to accurately identify acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in chest pain patients. The background evidence for this approach is limited. We evaluated whether on presentation and 4-hour high-sensitivity troponin I (hs-cTnI) could be used to accurately rule-out AMI., Design and Methods: hs-cTnI was measured on presentation and at 4-hours in adult patients attending an emergency department with possible acute coronary syndrome. We determined the sensitivity for AMI for at least one hs-cTnI above the 99th percentile for a healthy population or alone or in combination with new ischemic ECG changes. Both overall and sex-specific 99th percentiles were assessed. Patients with negative tests were designated low-risk., Results: 63 (17.1%) of 368 patients had AMI. The median (interquartile range) time from symptom onset to first blood sampling was 4.8h (2.8-8.6). The sensitivity of the presentation and 4h hs-cTnI using the overall 99th percentile was 92.1% (95% CI 82.4% to 97.4%) and negative predictive value 95.4% (92.3% to 97.4%) with 78.3% low-risk. Applying the sex-specific 99th percentile did not change the sensitivity. The addition of ECG did not change the sensitivity., Conclusion: Hs-cTnI >99th percentile thresholds measured on presentation and at 4-hours was not a safe strategy to rule-out AMI in this clinical setting irrespective of whether sex-specific 99th percentiles were used, or whether hs-cTnI was combined with ECG results., (Copyright © 2015 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Concentrations of troponin measured with high sensitivity troponin assays are raised in a number of emergency department (ED) patients; however many are not diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Clinical comparisons between the early use (2h after presentation) of high sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) and I (hs-cTnI) assays for the diagnosis of AMI have not been reported., Design and Methods: Early (0 h and 2 h) hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI assay results in 1571 ED patients with potential acute coronary syndrome (ACS) without ST elevation on electrocardiograph (ECG) were evaluated. The primary outcome was diagnosis of index AMI adjudicated by cardiologists using the local cTnI assay results taken ≥6 h after presentation, ECGs and clinical information. Stored samples were later analysed with hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI assays., Results: The ROC analysis for AMI (204 patients; 13.0%) for hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI after 2h was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.94-0.97) and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.97-0.99) respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PLR, and NLR of hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI for AMI after 2h were 94.1% (95% CI: 90.0-96.6) and 95.6% (95% CI: 91.8-97.7), 79.0% (95% CI: 76.8-81.1) and 92.5% (95% CI: 90.9-93.7), 4.48 (95% CI: 4.02-5.00) and 12.86 (95% CI: 10.51-15.31), and 0.07 (95% CI: 0.04-0.13) and 0.05 (95% CI:0.03-0.09) respectively., Conclusions: Exclusion of AMI 2h after presentation in emergency patients with possible ACS can be achieved using hs-cTnT or hs-cTnI assays. Significant differences in specificity of these assays are relevant and if using the hs-cTnT assay, further clinical assessment in a larger proportion of patients would be required., (Copyright © 2013 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. All rights reserved.)