Search

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between serum infliximab (IFX) levels and changes of RF and ACPA levels in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)., Methods: Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) [Promonitor® IFX R1 (version 2) (Progenika Biopharma, Spain)] were used to measure drug levels and antidrug-antibodies (ADAb) in IFX RA-treated patients (n=19). Disease activity was assessed using DAS28. IgM rheumatoid factor (RF) and IgM, IgA and IgG anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (ACPA) were determined through ELISA., Results: A significant decrease in RF (p=0.01), ACPA IgG (p=0.007), IgM (p=0.01) and IgA (p=0.03) was observed in patients presenting adequate levels of serum IFX. No significant changes to RF or ACPA were observed in patients with undetectable IFX., Conclusions: Data from this study support the hypothesis that the anti-TNF antagonist IFX downregulates autoantibody levels in RA patients when IFX levels are detectable. Larger-scale studies need to be performed to establish RF and ACPA presence as therapeutic response predictive factors.

Objectives: To evaluate biomechanical and ultrasound (US) abnormalities in SLE patients as compared with controls and to assess the relationship between these abnormalities and SLE activity., Methods: Fifty-four consecutive female patients with SLE with and without foot pain and 60 female controls (30 with foot pain and 30 without foot pain) were recruited. SLE activity was assessed by the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI). SLE patients and controls blindly underwent a comprehensive podiatric, biomechanical and US evaluation of the feet. US assessment included detection of B-mode synovitis, tenosynovitis, enthesopathy, bone changes and synovial, tenosynovial and entheseal power Doppler (PD) signal., Results: Thirty-one (57.4%) SLE patients had bilateral foot pain and 5 (9.3%) had unilateral foot pain. Metatarsalgia was the most common location for pain but without significant difference between groups (p=0.284). Toe joint deformities were significantly more common in SLE feet as compared with control feet (p<0.0005). SLE feet showed significantly more biomechanical abnormalities than control feet (p<0.05). B-mode synovitis in the tibiotalar joint was strongly associated with having SLE (p<0.0005) and the presence of synovial PD signal in the MTP joints was found only in painful feet of SLE patients. SLEDAI was significantly higher in patients with foot pain than in those with painless feet (p=0.008). However, SLEDAI did not discriminate between patients with and without biomechanical or US abnormalities., Conclusions: SLE patients showed more biomechanical and US abnormalities in the feet than controls, which were not captured by standardised assessment of the disease activity.

Objectives: To investigate the presence of biomechanical abnormalities and ultrasound (US)-detected inflammation and damage in low disease or remission status rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with foot complaints., Methods: We recruited 136 subjects with foot complaints. Sixty-two were biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-treated RA patients presenting Disease Activity Score-determined remission or low disease activity while the remaining 74 were gender matched controls without rheumatic or musculoskeletal disorders. Both groups underwent a comprehensive podiatric, biomechanical and B-mode and Doppler US assessment of the feet., Results: Most RA patients and controls were female (77.4% and 83.8%, respectively). There was no statistical difference in the proportion of obese subjects in either group (p=0.792). Inappropriate shoes were used by 50.0% of RA patients and 33.8% of controls (p=0.080). Talalgia, particularly heel pain, was more frequent in the control group, with associated talalgia and metatarsalgia being more prevalent in the RA group (p<0.05). The RA patient group was also more likely to present greater foot deformity, more limited joint movement and biomechanical abnormalities than the controls (p<0.05). US inflammatory and structural changes were significantly more frequent in RA patients than in controls (p<0.05). US structural involvement was significantly associated with limited joint mobility and pathologic biomechanical tests only in RA patients (p<0.05)., Conclusions: RA foot complaints seemed to be linked to US-detected RA involvement and biomechanical abnormalities. Podiatric and US assessments can be useful to help the clinician to optimise the management of RA patients in remission/low disease activity with foot complaints.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine the extent to which infliximab (IFX) serum levels impact disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients., Methods: In this cross sectional study, serum samples were taken prior to drug infusion from 60 RA patients who had been undergoing IFX therapy > 12 months as a first line of biological treatment. Patient IFX levels were tested and then associated with clinical disease activity. Three DAS28 cut-off points, <2.6, <3.2 and <5.1 were used to determine whether detectable IFX levels were any predictor of clinical disease activity. Logistic regression analysis was run to check other possible factors associated with RA clinical outcomes such as MTX concomitant use, CRP and ESR., Results: Sixteen (27%) out of the 60 patients tested negative; 28 (46%) presented subtherapeutic and 16 (27%) therapeutic IFX levels. Median IFX levels were higher in patients either in remission or showing low disease activity than in those with moderate and high disease activity (p=0.014). Significant association was found between IFX levels and clinical disease activity (p=0.001). Detectable levels of IFX shows better sensitivity and specificity to identify patients with DAS28<3.2 than to identify patients with DAS28<2.6 or DAS28<5.1. Conversely, the best DAS28 cut-off to identify detectable/undetectable IFX was 3.19, with AUC under ROC curve 0.804 (Sd.E 0.070), 76% specificity and 83% sensitivity (p<0.001). MTX use, CRP and ESR did not interfere with this association. Seven out of the 8 patients with anti-IFX antibodies presented DAS28>3.2 (p=0.005)., Conclusions: DAS28 and IFX serum levels were shown to have an inverse correlation. Undetectable IFX serum levels were associated to RA patients presenting DAS28>3.2 meaning that DAS28 <3.2 may be useful to clinicians to evaluate patient response to drug therapy.

Objectives: Infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADL) drug levels and anti-drug antibodies (ADA) are assessed using a variety of techniques, therefore, results cannot accurately be compared for clinical purposes. The aim of this study was to test two infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADL) ELISA versions, for drug levels and ADA, to see whether they yield similar results., Methods: ELISA versions [Promonitor® IFX R1 and R2 (V.1), Promonitor® IFX and Anti-IFX (V.2); Promonitor® ADL R1 and R2 (V.1), Promonitor® ADL and Anti-ADL (V.2) kits (Progenika Biopharma, Spain)] were used to measure drug levels and ADA in IFX (n=24) and ADL (n=24) rheumatoid arthritis-treated patients in three independent laboratories. Quantitative and qualitative agreements were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and Cohen's Kappa (κ) respectively. The Bland-Altman plots assessed differences between V.1 and V.2., Results: Interlaboratory agreement (ICC/κ) with V.1 was poor for IFX (0.66/0.62) and ADL (0.69/0.52) drug levels; meanwhile, high agreement was found with V.2 for IFX (0.98/0.95) and ADL (0.094/1.00). Comparison between V.1 and V.2 in each laboratory resulted in systematically higher values in V.2 than in V.1 and poor agreement (ICC/κ ranges) for IFX (0.12-0.7/ 0.19-0.42) and ADL (0.69-0.89 /0.50-0.73)., Conclusions: Qualitative measurements result in better agreement, as evidenced in our study. Greater agreement in V.2 compared with V.1 for IFX and ADL levels could be due to a better tune up. Further studies are required to standardise methods to establish therapeutic reference ranges.

Objectives: The aim of this paper is to assess the usefulness of measuring serum levels of adalimumab (ADL) and anti-ADL antibodies in 57 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with ADL for at least 3 months in daily practice., Methods: All patients received concomitant disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD). Receiver-operator characteristics (ROC) analysis was used to obtain the cut-off value of ADL for low disease activity (DAS28-ESR ≤3.2)., Results: Anti-ADL antibodies were detected in 4 (7%) patients with a mean (SD) DAS28 score of 4.6 (0.9). Patients with positive anti-ADL antibodies had significantly lower levels of ADL and higher DAS28 scores than those with negative antibodies. Patients with DAS28 ≤3.2 as compared with patients with DAS28 >3.2 showed significantly better SDAI score, higher serum concentrations of ADL and none of them showed anti-ADL antibodies. The cut-off of serum level of ADL for DAS28 <3.2 was 4.3 mg/L. According to serum levels of ADL, patients were grouped into group 1 (low level) <5.5 mg/L, group 2 (medium level) 5.5-11.3 mg/L and group 3 (high level) >11.3 mg/L. Patients in the medium group were closed to clinical remission (median DAS28 2.7) and patients in the high group were on clinical remission (DAS28 2.1)., Conclusions: Serum levels of ADL should be maintained >4.3 mg/L. In patients with ADL levels >11.3 mg/L, a decrease of the dose of ADL or an increase in the interval between doses may be planned. The presence of anti-ADL antibodies was associated with a loss of clinical efficacy of ADL.