Search

Exaggerated orthostatic blood pressure variation (EOV) is a poorly understood phenomenon related to high cardiovascular risk. We aimed to determine whether hypertensive patients with EOV have a distinct hemodynamic pattern, assessed through impedance cardiography. METHODS In treated hypertensive patients, we measured the cardiac index (CI), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI), blood pressure (BP), and heart rate (HR) in the supine and standing (after 3 minutes) positions, defining three groups according to BP variation: 1) Normal orthostatic BP variation (NOV): standing systolic BP (stSBP)-supine systolic BP (suSBP) between -20 and 20 mmHg and standing diastolic BP (stDBP)-supine diastolic BP (suDBP) between -10 and 10 mmHg; 2) orthostatic hypotension (OHypo): stSBP-suSBP≤-20 or stDBP-suDBP≤-10 mmHg; 3) orthostatic hypertension (OHyper): stSBP-suSBP≥20 or stDBP-suDBP≥10 mmHg. We performed multivariable analyses to determine the association of hemodynamic variables with EOV. RESULTS We included 186 patients. Those with OHyper had lower suDBP and higher orthostatic SVRI variation compared to NOV. In multivariable analyses, orthostatic HR variation (OR = 1.06 (95%CI 1.01-1.13), p = 0.03) and orthostatic SVRI variation (OR = 1.16 (95%CI 1.06-1.28), p = 0.002) were independently related to OHyper. No variables were independently associated with OHypo. CONCLUSION Patients with OHyper have a distinct hemodynamic pattern, with an exaggerated increase in SVRI and HR when standing.

We aimed to determine a possible association between isolated morning hypertension (IMH) and meal-induced blood pressure (BP) fall in adult treated hypertensive patients who underwent home BP measurements. A total of 230 patients were included, median age 73.6, 65.2% women. After adjusting for age, sex, number of antihypertensive drugs, office and home BP levels, the association between IMH and meal-induced BP fall was statistically significant. In conclusion, meal-induced BP fall and IMH detected through home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) are independently associated in hypertensive patients. The therapeutic implications of such observation need to be clarified in large-scale prospective studies.

We assessed prevalence and clinical characteristics of resistant hypertension (RH) and prevalence of false RH (white-coat effect [WCE] by home blood pressure [BP] monitoring), among a population of 302 treated hypertensive patients, mean age 66.6 (± 13.8), 67.5% women. Resistant hypertension was defined according to the American Heart Association criteria. Prevalence of RH was 10%, and the following five variables were independently associated with it: body mass index, diabetes, isolated systolic hypertension, orthostatic hypotension, and use of beta-blockers. Prevalence of WCE among subjects with office-RH was 27.6%. Our study identified easily measurable parameters related to RH. Standing BP should be systematically measured in individuals with RH.