Search

Atrial fibrillation is frequently observed in Fist Aid. A rare cause is myotonic dystrophy There are two forms: Steinert's dystrophy caused by a defect of a gene myotoninaprotein kinase and Promm secondary to a defect of a Zinc Finger Protein Gene Clinical manifestations are localized in skeletal and face muscles, vitreous body, sexual glands, endocrine system, smooth muscle, central nervous system and myocardium. Sometimes, in mild and unrecognized forms of this rare disease there are arrhythmias as atrial fibrillation. We report the clinical case of a 52 year-old man, with a suspect diagnosis of Steinert's dystrophy, admitted to the emergency room for a persistent atrial fibrillation. The patient begins oral anticoagulation therapy. The patient perform a transesophageal echocardiogram before the electrical cardioversion with reset to sinus rhythm. In conclusion, with improving the screening methods of patients with primary and secondary myopathies, it has been seen an increase of cases in which a cardiac involvement occurred before or after the onset of the neuromuscular disorders. One of the most frequent alterations is represented by atrial fibrillation, responsible for an increased risk of cerebral embolism, with absolute indication for oral anticoagulation therapy. The myopathy more frequently associated with atrial fibrillation, is myotonic dystrophy, although the risk of cerebral embolism in these patients does not appear to be higher than the general population. The present case report is a spur to perform the diagnosis of Steinert disease in cases admitted to an Emergency Room because of arrhytmias, because of the possibility to perform fast and reliable specific genetic tests. A similar praxis confers to these Units an even more diagnostic clinical role.

Myocarditis seems to be mostly caused by a viral infection or more rarely by a pharmacological hypersensitivity or by radiations exposure. Nevertheless, it is not so easy to know the ethiopathogenesis of the myocarditis, because mostly it is impossible to determine the infectious agent that causes the pathology even if it is isolated. The diagnosis could often remain uncertain, so a suspect of myocarditis has to be opportunely confirmed by specific serological and diagnostic investigations, in order to avoid the appearance of a dilated cardiomyopathy which is one of its principal sequences.

Unlabelled: Digoxin is typically prescribed in the treatment of heart failure. Its limited therapeutic range requires systematic monitoring of plasmatic concentration through immunoreactive tests. Laboratory results, however, can be altered by the presence of digoxin-like immunoreactive factors (DLIF) which are released in all clinical conditions involving volemic expansion., Case Report: An 86-year-old woman arrived in emergency with severe dyspnoea, atrial flutter and a medical history of ischemic cardiopathy. The patient was treated with ACE inhibitor, furosemide, spironolactone and digoxin. The first lab test for digoxin showed levels of digoxin of 7.05 ng/ml. Although the patient did not show any clinical evidence of digital intoxication nor was she treated with drugs which might interfere with digoxin kinetics and even if she had markers of renal function within clinical limits, digoxin was suspended and a treatment was initiated with 0.9% NaCl solution and furosemide. The second lab test showed levels of digoxin of 8.38 ng/ml. A possible interference of DLIF with immunoreactive tests was therefore assumed., Materials and Methods: The patient's serum was ultrafiltered and centrifugated to remove possible DLIF; subsequently, the measurement of digoxin levels was repeated. As a result, the digoxin level decreased to 0.25 ng/ml., Conclusions: DLIF increase in several diseases, including heart failure, end-stage renal disease, pre-eclampsy and acromegaly. High digoxin levels in a patient who does not show any symptoms of digital intoxication should lead to suspect the presence of these factors and to preventively determine DLIF in serum so as not to incur the risk of suspending an important treatment like digoxin in heart failure.

Introduction: The syncope is a common cause of admission to Emergency Departments, representing around 1-3% of all admissions to the service. However, elderly age and important comorbidities often hinder a definite etiologic diagnosis, with increasing requests for diagnostic tests and longer periods of hospitalization., Materials and Methods: We analyzed the management of 1,204 patients admitted to our Emergency Department for transient loss of consciousness in the period between 1 June 2009 and 1 June 2010, evaluating the following parameters: average age, gender, triage color code at admittance, performed diagnostic tests, diagnosis at discharge from ED and destination ward. We also studied a subgroup of 93 patients admitted to emergency medicine units evaluating their OESIL score at admittance, comorbidities, performed diagnostic tests and diagnosis at discharge from the ward., Results: In the Emergency Department, 45% of patients were discharged with a diagnosis of syncope of unknown origin; in 21% of patients syncope was excluded; 19% of patients received a diagnosis of cardiogenic syncope; 11% were diagnosed with a presyncope; 3% with orthostatic hypotension and 1% with vasovagal syncope. In emergency medicine units, 51% of patients were discharged with a diagnosis of cardiogenic syncope, 11% were diagnosed with vasovagal syncope, 11% with presyncope, 11% with TIA, 8% with loss of consciousness non-syncope and 8% with syncope of unknown origin., Conclusions: Management of patients with syncope, elderly people with important comorbidities in particular, is still a serious problem for the emergency physician. The creation of specialized units for the management of syncope, the so-called syncope units, through the implementation of a shared diagnostic and therapeutic protocol, aims at reducing inappropriate hospitalization and average length of stay.

Aims: The evaluation of the patient with chest pain in the emergency department is one of the most common situations that the doctor has to face. The diagnostic procedure supposes an observation period of at least 6-12 hours, a well organized medical facilities and the identification of all SCA cases to reduce inappropriate admission., Materials and Methods: In our study we have estimated the utility of the marker assay that is associated to the use of risk scores (TIMI and GRACE risk score) to obtain indication about the most appropriate assistance level. In particular, we used the assay of necrosis markers to highlight the damage along with the assay of natriuretic peptides for their role in the diagnosis and in the monitoring of the patients with cardiac damage., Results: Also PCR has an important role such as marker of plaque stability and of inflammation. These markers associated to the necrosis markers could give important clinical information of independent nature., Discussion: The sensibility of laboratory markers, without important necrosis, is low and it is not possible to exclude in a few time a SCA There is now an alternative strategy: a precocious risk stratification. Using clinical criteria it is possible to do a first evaluation of the probability of SCA and the complications.

In Italy one of the most common cause of access to the Emergency Departments is not traumatic chest pain, representing from the 6% to 10% of all the diagnoses. Admissions to the Emergency Department (DEA) of Policlinico Umberto I of Rome for non-traumatic chest pain, occurred between 2000 and 2008, were analyzed in this study. Out of 26,8910 admissions to the medical emergency room (PS), 21,088 (7.84%) were due to non-traumatic or precordial chest pain. Of these, 2881 (14%) patients had a diagnosis of myocardial infarction STEMI, NSTEMI and IA and 18,207 (86%) had a diagnosis of atypical chest pain, representing respectively 1.07% and 6.77% of all admissions to PS. About 27.62% of patients with atypical chest pain were discharged from the PS, 33.27% were hospitalized, 36.73% refused hospitalization, 1.68% were transferred elsewhere, and 0.7% did not uptake the visit. 85% of patients with myocardial infarction STEMI, NSTEMI and IA were hospitalized, 3.75% refused hospitalization, 8.82% were transferred elsewhere, and 1.71% died in the PS. Hospitalizations resulted often in unjustified and protracted length of hospital stays for clinical investigations, with negative repercussions for patients and costs. In the last years, the number of inappropriate hospitalizations progressively increased, partly as consequence of recourse to the court aiming at defining legal responsibility of the health board.Since avoiding inappropriate hospital admissions is an essential requirement for containing healthcare costs and improving the health service, Chest Pain Unit has been established. Its responsibility is to recognize and promptly treat patients with chest pain and acute coronary syndrome. As well, it is responsible to quickly discharge patients with chest pain at low and intermediate risk of acute coronary insufficiency, after careful clinical assessment lasting 24-36 hours.