Search

Background: The study aim is to compare cTnI values measured with three high-sensitivity (hs) methods in apparently healthy volunteers and patients admitted to emergency department (ED) with acute coronary syndrome enrolled in a large multicentre study., Methods: Heparinized plasma samples were collected from 1511 apparently healthy subjects from 8 Italian clinical institutions (mean age: 51.5 years, SD: 14.1 years, range: 18-65 years, F/M ratio:0.95). All volunteers denied chronic or acute diseases and had normal values of routine laboratory tests. Moreover, 1322 heparinized plasma sample were also collected by 9 Italian clinical institutions from patients admitted to ED with clinical symptoms typical of acute coronary syndrome. The reference study laboratory assayed all plasma samples with three hs-methods: Architect hs-cTnI, Access hs-cTnI and ADVIA Centaur XPT methods. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was also used to analyze the between-method differences among hs-cTnI assays., Results: On average, a between-method difference of 31.2% CV was found among the results of hs-cTnI immunoassays. ADVIA Centaur XPT method measured higher cTnI values than Architect and Access methods. Moreover, 99th percentile URL values depended not only on age and sex of reference population, but also on the statistical approach used for calculation (robust non-parametric vs bootstrap)., Conclusions: Due to differences in concentrations and reference values, clinicians should be advised that plasma samples of the same patient should be measured for cTnI assay in the same laboratory. Specific clinical studies are needed to establish the most appropriate statistical approach to calculate the 99th percentile URL values for hs-cTnI methods., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: According to quality specifications required by international guidelines, the evaluation of the 99th URL value is a very difficult task that is usually beyond the capacity of a single laboratory. The aims of this article are to report and discuss the results of a multicenter study concerning the evaluation of the 99th percentile URL and reference change (RCV) of the ADVIA Centaur High-Sensitivity Troponin I (TNIH), recently distributed to the Italian clinical laboratories., Materials and Methods: The reference population evaluated with ADVIA XPT method for the calculation of cTnI reference distribution parameters consisted of 1325 healthy adults subjects (age range from 18 to 86 years), including 653 women (mean age 50.7 years, SD 14.5 years) and 672 men (mean age 50.9 years, SD 13.8 years), well matched for both age (P = .8112) and sex (F/M = 0.97)., Results: cTnI distribution values of reference population was highly skewed, while log-transformed cTnI values roughly approximated a log-normal distribution. Men have higher cTnI values than women throughout all the adult lifespan. Moreover, the subjects with age ≤ 55 years had significantly lower cTnI values than those with age > 55 years (p < .0001). Of note, 62% of women and 77% of men had equal or higher than cTnI values than the LoD value of the method (i.e., 2.2 ng/L)., Conclusions: The results of the present study demonstrate that the ADVIA Centaur High-Sensitivity Troponin I using the XPT automated platform fits both the criteria and quality specifications required by the most recent international guidelines for high-sensitivity methods for cTnI assay., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The Italian Society of Clinical Biochemistry (SIBioC) and the Italian Section of the European Ligand Assay Society (ELAS) have recently promoted a multicenter study (Italian hs-cTnI Study) with the aim to accurately evaluate analytical performances and reference values of the most popular cTnI methods commercially available in Italy. The aim of this article is to report the results of the Italian hs-cTnI Study concerning the evaluation of the 99th percentile URL and reference change (RCV) values around the 99th URL of the Access cTnI method., Materials and Methods: Heparinized plasma samples were collected from 1306 healthy adult volunteers by 8 Italian clinical centers. Every center collected from 50 to 150 plasma samples from healthy adult subjects. All volunteers denied the presence of chronic or acute diseases and had normal values of routine laboratory tests (including creatinine, electrolytes, glucose and blood counts). An older cohort of 457 adult subjects (mean age 63.0 years; SD 8.1 years, minimum 47 years, maximum 86 years) underwent also ECG and cardiac imaging analysis in order to exclude the presence of asymptomatic cardiac disease., Results and Conclusions: The results of the present study confirm that the Access hsTnI method using the DxI platform satisfies the two criteria required by international guidelines for high-sensitivity methods for cTn assay. Furthermore, the results of this study confirm that the calculation of the 99th percentile URL values are greatly affected not only by age and sex of the reference population, but also by the statistical approach used for calculation of cTnI distribution parameters., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aim of the Study: Recently, Beckman Coulter Diagnostics set up a new TSH immunoassay for the automated DxI platform. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the analytical performance and clinical results of this method with those of previous method., Material and Methods: A multicenter study (named TSH ELAS Study) was organized using 593 serum samples, collected from healthy subjects and patients with thyroid disorders, and 13 control samples, circulated in an External Quality Assessment (EQA) scheme., Results: The values of LoB and LoD, and LoQ at 20% CV were 0.0004mIU/L, 0.001mIU/L and 0.0023mIU/L, respectively. Moreover, TSH concentrations >0.01mIU/L actually show imprecision values lower than 5% CV. This new TSH assay showed a systematic underestimation (on average of 6.25%) compared to old method, which is mainly due to larger differences between methods for samples with low TSH concentrations, related to the better analytical sensitivity of new compared to old method. In a reference population, including 279 apparently healthy adult subjects, Caucasian volunteers (mean age 43.6years, age 20-63years, 138 women and 141 males) the distribution of TSH concentrations was: mean (CI 95%) 1.694mIU/L (1.588-1.779), median 1.495mIU/L (1.412-1.588mIU/L), 97.5th percentile 3.707mIU/L., Conclusions: The new TSH immunoassay for DxI platform shows some relevant improvements compared to the previous one: use of the most recent WHO 3rd IRP 81/563 standard and monoclonal antibodies (instead of polyclonal antibodies of the old method), and better analytical sensitivities and reproducibility., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)