Search

Your search keyword '"van Vuuren, Detlef P."' showing total 92 results
Start Over Author "van Vuuren, Detlef P." Journal climatic change
92 results on '"van Vuuren, Detlef P."'

1. The contribution of bioenergy to the decarbonization of transport: a multi-model assessment

Author

Leblanc, Florian, primary, Bibas, Ruben, additional, Mima, Silvana, additional, Muratori, Matteo, additional, Sakamoto, Shogo, additional, Sano, Fuminori, additional, Bauer, Nico, additional, Daioglou, Vassilis, additional, Fujimori, Shinichiro, additional, Gidden, Matthew J., additional, Kato, Estsushi, additional, Rose, Steven K., additional, Tsutsui, Junichi, additional, van Vuuren, Detlef P., additional, Weyant, John, additional, and Wise, Marshall, additional

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Can global models provide insights into regional mitigation strategies? A diagnostic model comparison study of bioenergy in Brazil

Author

Köberle, Alexandre C., primary, Daioglou, Vassilis, additional, Rochedo, Pedro, additional, Lucena, André F. P., additional, Szklo, Alexandre, additional, Fujimori, Shinichiro, additional, Brunelle, Thierry, additional, Kato, Etsushi, additional, Kitous, Alban, additional, van Vuuren, Detlef P., additional, and Schaeffer, Roberto, additional

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Adaptation in integrated assessment modeling: where do we stand?

Author

Patt, Anthony G., van Vuuren, Detlef P., Berkhout, Frans, Aaheim, Asbjorn, Hof, Andries F., Isaac, Morna, and Mechler, Reinhard

Subjects
Environmental protection -- Management, Environmental impact statements -- Management, Environmental issue, Company business management, Earth sciences
Abstract

Byline: Anthony G. Patt (1), Detlef P. van Vuuren (2), Frans Berkhout (3), Asbjorn Aaheim (4), Andries F. Hof (2), Morna Isaac (2), Reinhard Mechler (1) Abstract: Adaptation is an important element on the climate change policy agenda. Integrated assessment models, which are key tools to assess climate change policies, have begun to address adaptation, either by including it implicitly in damage cost estimates, or by making it an explicit control variable. We analyze how modelers have chosen to describe adaptation within an integrated framework, and suggest many ways they could improve the treatment of adaptation by considering more of its bottom-up characteristics. Until this happens, we suggest, models may be too optimistic about the net benefits adaptation can provide, and therefore may underestimate the amount of mitigation they judge to be socially optimal. Under some conditions, better modeling of adaptation costs and benefits could have important implications for defining mitigation targets. Author Affiliation: (1) International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Schlossplatz 1, 2361, Laxenburg, Austria (2) Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Bilthoven, The Netherlands (3) Institute for Environmental Studies, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (4) Center for Climate and Environmental Research Oslo, Oslo, Norway Article History: Registration Date: 11/08/2009 Received Date: 28/04/2008 Accepted Date: 10/08/2009 Online Date: 15/10/2009

Published
2010

8. The consistency of IPCC's SRES scenarios to recent literature and recent projections

Author

Van Vuuren, Detlef P. and O'Neill, Brian C.

Subjects
Air pollution -- Reports, Earth sciences
Abstract

The greenhouse gas emissions scenarios published by the IPCC in the Special Report on Emission Scenarios (SRES) continue to serve as a primary basis for assessing future climate change and possible response strategies. These scenarios were developed between 1996 and 1999 and sufficient time has now passed to make it worth examining their consistency with more recent data and projections. The comparison performed in this paper includes population, GDP, energy use, and emissions of C[O.sub.2], non-C[O.sub.2] gases and sulfur. We find the SRES scenarios to be largely consistent with historical data for the 1990-2000 period and with recent projections. Exceptions to this general observation include (1) in the long-term, relatively high population growth assumptions in some regions, particularly in the A2 scenario; (2) in the medium-term, relatively high economic growth assumptions in the LAM (Latin America, Africa and Middle East) region in the A1 scenario; (3) in the short-term, C[O.sub.2] emissions projections in A1 that are somewhat higher than the range of current scenarios; and (4) substantially higher sulfur emissions in some scenarios than in historical data and recent projections. In conclusion, given the relatively small inconsistencies for use as global scenarios there seems to be no immediate need for a large-scale IPCC-led update of the SRES scenarios that is solely based on the SRES scenario performance vis-a-vis data for the 1990-2000 period and/or more recent projections. Based on reported findings, individual research teams could make, and in some cases already have made, useful updates of the scenarios.

Published
2006

11. Implications of climate change mitigation strategies on international bioenergy trade

Author

Daioglou, Vassilis, primary, Muratori, Matteo, additional, Lamers, Patrick, additional, Fujimori, Shinichiro, additional, Kitous, Alban, additional, Köberle, Alexandre C., additional, Bauer, Nico, additional, Junginger, Martin, additional, Kato, Etsushi, additional, Leblanc, Florian, additional, Mima, Silvana, additional, Wise, Marshal, additional, and van Vuuren, Detlef P., additional

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

12. Impact of methane and black carbon mitigation on forcing and temperature: a multi-model scenario analysis

Author

Smith, Steven J, primary, Chateau, Jean, additional, Dorheim, Kalyn, additional, Drouet, Laurent, additional, Durand-Lasserve, Olivier, additional, Fricko, Oliver, additional, Fujimori, Shinichiro, additional, Hanaoka, Tatsuya, additional, Harmsen, Mathijs, additional, Hilaire, Jérôme, additional, Keramidas, Kimon, additional, Klimont, Zbigniew, additional, Luderer, Gunnar, additional, Moura, Maria Cecilia P., additional, Riahi, Keywan, additional, Rogelj, Joeri, additional, Sano, Fuminori, additional, van Vuuren, Detlef P., additional, and Wada, Kenichi, additional

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

13. Bioenergy technologies in long-run climate change mitigation: results from the EMF-33 study

Author

Daioglou, Vassilis, primary, Rose, Steven K., additional, Bauer, Nico, additional, Kitous, Alban, additional, Muratori, Matteo, additional, Sano, Fuminori, additional, Fujimori, Shinichiro, additional, Gidden, Matthew J., additional, Kato, Etsushi, additional, Keramidas, Kimon, additional, Klein, David, additional, Leblanc, Florian, additional, Tsutsui, Junichi, additional, Wise, Marshal, additional, and van Vuuren, Detlef P., additional

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

14. EMF-33 insights on bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS)

Author

Muratori, Matteo, primary, Bauer, Nico, additional, Rose, Steven K., additional, Wise, Marshall, additional, Daioglou, Vassilis, additional, Cui, Yiyun, additional, Kato, Etsushi, additional, Gidden, Matthew, additional, Strefler, Jessica, additional, Fujimori, Shinichiro, additional, Sands, Ronald D., additional, van Vuuren, Detlef P., additional, and Weyant, John, additional

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

18. Taking some heat off the NDCs? The limited potential of additional short-lived climate forcers’ mitigation

Author

Harmsen, Mathijs, primary, Fricko, Oliver, additional, Hilaire, Jérôme, additional, van Vuuren, Detlef P., additional, Drouet, Laurent, additional, Durand-Lasserve, Olivier, additional, Fujimori, Shinichiro, additional, Keramidas, Kimon, additional, Klimont, Zbigniew, additional, Luderer, Gunnar, additional, Aleluia Reis, Lara, additional, Riahi, Keywan, additional, Sano, Fuminori, additional, and Smith, Steven J., additional

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

19. The role of methane in future climate strategies: mitigation potentials and climate impacts

Author

Harmsen, Mathijs, primary, van Vuuren, Detlef P., additional, Bodirsky, Benjamin Leon, additional, Chateau, Jean, additional, Durand-Lasserve, Olivier, additional, Drouet, Laurent, additional, Fricko, Oliver, additional, Fujimori, Shinichiro, additional, Gernaat, David E. H. J., additional, Hanaoka, Tatsuya, additional, Hilaire, Jérôme, additional, Keramidas, Kimon, additional, Luderer, Gunnar, additional, Moura, Maria Cecilia P., additional, Sano, Fuminori, additional, Smith, Steven J., additional, and Wada, Kenichi, additional

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

20. Implications of various effort-sharing approaches for national carbon budgets and emission pathways

Author

van den Berg, Nicole J., primary, van Soest, Heleen L., additional, Hof, Andries F., additional, den Elzen, Michel G. J., additional, van Vuuren, Detlef P., additional, Chen, Wenying, additional, Drouet, Laurent, additional, Emmerling, Johannes, additional, Fujimori, Shinichiro, additional, Höhne, Niklas, additional, Kõberle, Alexandre C., additional, McCollum, David, additional, Schaeffer, Roberto, additional, Shekhar, Swapnil, additional, Vishwanathan, Saritha Sudharmma, additional, Vrontisi, Zoi, additional, and Blok, Kornelis, additional

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

21. The role of methane in future climate strategies: mitigation potentials and climate impacts.

Author

Harmsen, Mathijs, van Vuuren, Detlef P., Bodirsky, Benjamin Leon, Chateau, Jean, Durand-Lasserve, Olivier, Drouet, Laurent, Fricko, Oliver, Fujimori, Shinichiro, Gernaat, David E. H. J., Hanaoka, Tatsuya, Hilaire, Jérôme, Keramidas, Kimon, Luderer, Gunnar, Moura, Maria Cecilia P., Sano, Fuminori, Smith, Steven J., and Wada, Kenichi

Subjects
CLIMATE change mitigation, REDUCTION potential, METHANE
Abstract

This study examines model-specific assumptions and projections of methane (CH4) emissions in deep mitigation scenarios generated by integrated assessment models (IAMs). For this, scenarios of nine models are compared in terms of sectoral and regional CH4 emission reduction strategies, as well as resulting climate impacts. The models' projected reduction potentials are compared to sector and technology-specific reduction potentials found in literature. Significant cost-effective and non-climate policy related reductions are projected in the reference case (10–36% compared to a "frozen emission factor" scenario in 2100). Still, compared to 2010, CH4 emissions are expected to rise steadily by 9–72% (up to 412 to 654 Mt CH4/year). Ambitious CO2 reduction measures could by themselves lead to a reduction of CH4 emissions due to a reduction of fossil fuels (22–48% compared to the reference case in 2100). However, direct CH4 mitigation is crucial and more effective in bringing down CH4 (50–74% compared to the reference case). Given the limited reduction potential, agriculture CH4 emissions are projected to constitute an increasingly larger share of total anthropogenic CH4 emissions in mitigation scenarios. Enteric fermentation in ruminants is in that respect by far the largest mitigation bottleneck later in the century with a projected 40–78% of total remaining CH4 emissions in 2100 in a strong (2 °C) climate policy case. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

22. Biomass residues as twenty-first century bioenergy feedstock—a comparison of eight integrated assessment models.

Author

Hanssen, Steef V., Daioglou, Vassilis, Steinmann, Zoran J. N., Frank, Stefan, Popp, Alexander, Brunelle, Thierry, Lauri, Pekka, Hasegawa, Tomoko, Huijbregts, Mark A. J., and Van Vuuren, Detlef P.

Subjects
TWENTY-first century, BIOMASS, CLIMATE change mitigation, FOSSIL fuels, FEEDSTOCK, CARBON pricing, FORESTS & forestry
Abstract

In the twenty-first century, modern bioenergy could become one of the largest sources of energy, partially replacing fossil fuels and contributing to climate change mitigation. Agricultural and forestry biomass residues form an inexpensive bioenergy feedstock with low greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, if harvested sustainably. We analysed quantities of biomass residues supplied for energy and their sensitivities in harmonised bioenergy demand scenarios across eight integrated assessment models (IAMs) and compared them with literature-estimated residue availability. IAM results vary substantially, at both global and regional scales, but suggest that residues could meet 7–50% of bioenergy demand towards 2050, and 2–30% towards 2100, in a scenario with 300 EJ/year of exogenous bioenergy demand towards 2100. When considering mean literature-estimated availability, residues could provide around 55 EJ/year by 2050. Inter-model differences primarily arise from model structure, assumptions, and the representation of agriculture and forestry. Despite these differences, drivers of residues supplied and underlying cost dynamics are largely similar across models. Higher bioenergy demand or biomass prices increase the quantity of residues supplied for energy, though their effects level off as residues become depleted. GHG emission pricing and land protection can increase the costs of using land for lignocellulosic bioenergy crop cultivation, which increases residue use at the expense of lignocellulosic bioenergy crops. In most IAMs and scenarios, supplied residues in 2050 are within literature-estimated residue availability, but outliers and sustainability concerns warrant further exploration. We conclude that residues can cost-competitively play an important role in the twenty-first century bioenergy supply, though uncertainties remain concerning (regional) forestry and agricultural production and resulting residue supply potentials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

23. Taking some heat off the NDCs? The limited potential of additional short-lived climate forcers' mitigation.

Author

Harmsen, Mathijs, Fricko, Oliver, Hilaire, Jérôme, van Vuuren, Detlef P., Drouet, Laurent, Durand-Lasserve, Olivier, Fujimori, Shinichiro, Keramidas, Kimon, Klimont, Zbigniew, Luderer, Gunnar, Aleluia Reis, Lara, Riahi, Keywan, Sano, Fuminori, and Smith, Steven J.

Subjects
TEMPERATURE effect, HEAT, CLIMATE change mitigation, CARBON-black, GREENHOUSE gases
Abstract

Several studies have shown that the greenhouse gas reduction resulting from the current nationally determined contributions (NDCs) will not be enough to meet the overall targets of the Paris Climate Agreement. It has been suggested that more ambition mitigations of short-lived climate forcer (SLCF) emissions could potentially be a way to reduce the risk of overshooting the 1.5 or 2 °C target in a cost-effective way. In this study, we employ eight state-of-the-art integrated assessment models (IAMs) to examine the global temperature effects of ambitious reductions of methane, black and organic carbon, and hydrofluorocarbon emissions. The SLCFs measures considered are found to add significantly to the effect of the NDCs on short-term global mean temperature (GMT) (in the year 2040: − 0.03 to − 0.15 °C) and on reducing the short-term rate-of-change (by − 2 to 15%), but only a small effect on reducing the maximum temperature change before 2100. This, because later in the century under assumed ambitious climate policy, SLCF mitigation is maximized, either directly or indirectly due to changes in the energy system. All three SLCF groups can contribute to achieving GMT changes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

24. Global energy sector emission reductions and bioenergy use: overview of the bioenergy demand phase of the EMF-33 model comparison.

Author

Bauer, Nico, Rose, Steven K., Fujimori, Shinichiro, van Vuuren, Detlef P., Weyant, John, Wise, Marshall, Cui, Yiyun, Daioglou, Vassilis, Gidden, Matthew J., Kato, Etsushi, Kitous, Alban, Leblanc, Florian, Sands, Ronald, Sano, Fuminori, Strefler, Jessica, Tsutsui, Junichi, Bibas, Ruben, Fricko, Oliver, Hasegawa, Tomoko, and Klein, David

Subjects
CARBON pricing, PRICE increases, FOSSIL fuels, CARBON sequestration, BIOMASS chemicals, FEEDSTOCK, FLEXIBILITY (Mechanics)
Abstract

We present an overview of results from 11 integrated assessment models (IAMs) that participated in the 33rd study of the Stanford Energy Modeling Forum (EMF-33) on the viability of large-scale deployment of bioenergy for achieving long-run climate goals. The study explores future bioenergy use across models under harmonized scenarios for future climate policies, availability of bioenergy technologies, and constraints on biomass supply. This paper provides a more transparent description of IAMs that span a broad range of assumptions regarding model structures, energy sectors, and bioenergy conversion chains. Without emission constraints, we find vastly different CO2 emission and bioenergy deployment patterns across models due to differences in competition with fossil fuels, the possibility to produce large-scale bio-liquids, and the flexibility of energy systems. Imposing increasingly stringent carbon budgets mostly increases bioenergy use. A diverse set of available bioenergy technology portfolios provides flexibility to allocate bioenergy to supply different final energy as well as remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere by combining bioenergy with carbon capture and sequestration (BECCS). Sector and regional bioenergy allocation varies dramatically across models mainly due to bioenergy technology availability and costs, final energy patterns, and availability of alternative decarbonization options. Although much bioenergy is used in combination with CCS, BECCS is not necessarily the driver of bioenergy use. We find that the flexibility to use biomass feedstocks in different energy sub-sectors makes large-scale bioenergy deployment a robust strategy in mitigation scenarios that is surprisingly insensitive with respect to reduced technology availability. However, the achievability of stringent carbon budgets and associated carbon prices is sensitive. Constraints on biomass feedstock supply increase the carbon price less significantly than excluding BECCS because carbon removals are still realized and valued. Incremental sensitivity tests find that delayed readiness of bioenergy technologies until 2050 is more important than potentially higher investment costs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

25. Implications of various effort-sharing approaches for national carbon budgets and emission pathways.

Author

van den Berg, Nicole J., van Soest, Heleen L., Hof, Andries F., den Elzen, Michel G. J., van Vuuren, Detlef P., Chen, Wenying, Drouet, Laurent, Emmerling, Johannes, Fujimori, Shinichiro, Höhne, Niklas, Kõberle, Alexandre C., McCollum, David, Schaeffer, Roberto, Shekhar, Swapnil, Vishwanathan, Saritha Sudharmma, Vrontisi, Zoi, and Blok, Kornelis

Subjects
GREENHOUSE gas mitigation, BUDGET, DEVELOPED countries, CARBON, GREENHOUSE gases
Abstract

The bottom-up approach of the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) in the Paris Agreement has led countries to self-determine their greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction targets. The planned 'ratcheting-up' process, which aims to ensure that the NDCs comply with the overall goal of limiting global average temperature increase to well below 2 °C or even 1.5 °C, will most likely include some evaluation of 'fairness' of these reduction targets. In the literature, fairness has been discussed around equity principles, for which many different effort-sharing approaches have been proposed. In this research, we analysed how country-level emission targets and carbon budgets can be derived based on such criteria. We apply novel methods directly based on the global carbon budget, and, for comparison, more commonly used methods using GHG mitigation pathways. For both, we studied the following approaches: equal cumulative per capita emissions, contraction and convergence, grandfathering, greenhouse development rights and ability to pay. As the results critically depend on parameter settings, we used the wide authorship from a range of countries included in this paper to determine default settings and sensitivity analyses. Results show that effort-sharing approaches that (i) calculate required reduction targets in carbon budgets (relative to baseline budgets) and/or (ii) take into account historical emissions when determining carbon budgets can lead to (large) negative remaining carbon budgets for developed countries. This is the case for the equal cumulative per capita approach and especially the greenhouse development rights approach. Furthermore, for developed countries, all effort-sharing approaches except grandfathering lead to more stringent budgets than cost-optimal budgets, indicating that cost-optimal approaches do not lead to outcomes that can be regarded as fair according to most effort-sharing approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

26. Global energy sector emission reductions and bioenergy use: overview of the bioenergy demand phase of the EMF-33 model comparison

Author

Bauer, Nico, primary, Rose, Steven K., additional, Fujimori, Shinichiro, additional, van Vuuren, Detlef P., additional, Weyant, John, additional, Wise, Marshall, additional, Cui, Yiyun, additional, Daioglou, Vassilis, additional, Gidden, Matthew J., additional, Kato, Etsushi, additional, Kitous, Alban, additional, Leblanc, Florian, additional, Sands, Ronald, additional, Sano, Fuminori, additional, Strefler, Jessica, additional, Tsutsui, Junichi, additional, Bibas, Ruben, additional, Fricko, Oliver, additional, Hasegawa, Tomoko, additional, Klein, David, additional, Kurosawa, Atsushi, additional, Mima, Silvana, additional, and Muratori, Matteo, additional

Published
2018
Full Text
View/download PDF

27. RCP2.6: exploring the possibility to keep global mean temperature increase below 2°C

Author

van Vuuren, Detlef P., Stehfest, Elke, den Elzen, Michel G J, Kram, Tom, van Vliet, Jasper, Deetman, Sebastiaan, Isaac, Morna, Goldewijk, Kees Klein, Hof, Andries, Beltran, Angelica Mendoza, Oostenrijk, Rineke, van Ruijven, Bas, OGKG - Sociaal-economische geschiedenis, Environmental Sciences, Sub IMW afd MNW 3e geldstroom, LS Economische Geschiedenis, OGKG - Sociaal-economische geschiedenis, Environmental Sciences, Sub IMW afd MNW 3e geldstroom, and LS Economische Geschiedenis

Subjects
Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Meteorology, Land use, Climate change, Energy consumption, Radiative forcing, Environmental economics, Greenhouse gas, Environmental science, Mean radiant temperature, Baseline (configuration management)
Abstract

The RCP2.6 emission and concentration pathway is representative of the literature on mitigation scenarios aiming to limit the increase of global mean temperature to 2°C. These scenarios form the low end of the scenario literature in terms of emissions and radiative forcing. They often show negative emissions from energy use in the second half of the 21st century. The RCP2. 6 scenario is shown to be technically feasible in the IMAGE integrated assessment modeling framework from a medium emission baseline scenario, assuming full participation of all countries. Cumulative emissions of greenhouse gases from 2010 to 2100 need to be reduced by 70% compared to a baseline scenario, requiring substantial changes in energy use and emissions of non-CO2 gases. These measures (specifically the use of bio-energy and reforestation measures) also have clear consequences for global land use. Based on the RCP2. 6 scenario, recommendations for further research on low emission scenarios have been formulated. These include the response of the climate system to a radiative forcing peak, the ability of society to achieve the required emission reduction rates given political and social inertia and the possibilities to further reduce emissions of non-CO2 gases. © 2011 The Author(s).

Published
2011

28. Early action on Paris Agreement allows for more time to change energy systems

Author

van Soest, Heleen L., primary, de Boer, Harmen Sytze, additional, Roelfsema, Mark, additional, den Elzen, Michel G.J., additional, Admiraal, Annemiek, additional, van Vuuren, Detlef P., additional, Hof, Andries F., additional, van den Berg, Maarten, additional, Harmsen, Mathijs J.H.M., additional, Gernaat, David E.H.J., additional, and Forsell, Nicklas, additional

Published
2017
Full Text
View/download PDF

29. Low-emission pathways in 11 major economies: comparison of cost-optimal pathways and Paris climate proposals

Author

van Soest, Heleen L., primary, Aleluia Reis, Lara, additional, Drouet, Laurent, additional, van Vuuren, Detlef P., additional, den Elzen, Michel G. J., additional, Tavoni, Massimo, additional, Akimoto, Keigo, additional, Calvin, Katherine V., additional, Fragkos, Panagiotis, additional, Kitous, Alban, additional, Luderer, Gunnar, additional, and Riahi, Keywan, additional

Published
2017
Full Text
View/download PDF

34. The role of technology for achieving climate policy objectives: overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategies

Author

Kriegler, Elmar, primary, Weyant, John P., additional, Blanford, Geoffrey J., additional, Krey, Volker, additional, Clarke, Leon, additional, Edmonds, Jae, additional, Fawcett, Allen, additional, Luderer, Gunnar, additional, Riahi, Keywan, additional, Richels, Richard, additional, Rose, Steven K., additional, Tavoni, Massimo, additional, and van Vuuren, Detlef P., additional

Published
2014
Full Text
View/download PDF

42. A new scenario framework for climate change research: background, process, and future directions

Author

Ebi, Kristie L., primary, Hallegatte, Stephane, additional, Kram, Tom, additional, Arnell, Nigel W., additional, Carter, Timothy R., additional, Edmonds, Jae, additional, Kriegler, Elmar, additional, Mathur, Ritu, additional, O’Neill, Brian C., additional, Riahi, Keywan, additional, Winkler, Harald, additional, Van Vuuren, Detlef P., additional, and Zwickel, Timm, additional

Published
2013
Full Text
View/download PDF

43. Land-use transition for bioenergy and climate stabilization: model comparison of drivers, impacts and interactions with other land use based mitigation options

Author

Popp, Alexander, primary, Rose, Steven K., additional, Calvin, Katherine, additional, Van Vuuren, Detlef P., additional, Dietrich, Jan Phillip, additional, Wise, Marshall, additional, Stehfest, Elke, additional, Humpenöder, Florian, additional, Kyle, Page, additional, Van Vliet, Jasper, additional, Bauer, Nico, additional, Lotze-Campen, Hermann, additional, Klein, David, additional, and Kriegler, Elmar, additional

Published
2013
Full Text
View/download PDF

49. Evolution of anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of air pollutants at global and regional scales during the 1980–2010 period

Author

Granier, Claire, primary, Bessagnet, Bertrand, additional, Bond, Tami, additional, D’Angiola, Ariela, additional, Denier van der Gon, Hugo, additional, Frost, Gregory J., additional, Heil, Angelika, additional, Kaiser, Johannes W., additional, Kinne, Stefan, additional, Klimont, Zbigniew, additional, Kloster, Silvia, additional, Lamarque, Jean-François, additional, Liousse, Catherine, additional, Masui, Toshihiko, additional, Meleux, Frederik, additional, Mieville, Aude, additional, Ohara, Toshimasa, additional, Raut, Jean-Christophe, additional, Riahi, Keywan, additional, Schultz, Martin G., additional, Smith, Steven J., additional, Thompson, Allison, additional, van Aardenne, John, additional, van der Werf, Guido R., additional, and van Vuuren, Detlef P., additional

Published
2011
Full Text
View/download PDF

50. A special issue on the RCPs

Author

van Vuuren, Detlef P., primary, Edmonds, James A., additional, Kainuma, Mikiko, additional, Riahi, Keywan, additional, and Weyant, John, additional

Published
2011
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results