1. Comparación a largo plazo de resultados en mastopexia con patrón de cicatriz en T invertida o periareolar. Casuística personal.
- Author
-
DE RUNGS BROWN, David, ZAMORA MADRAZO, Adolfo, GONZÁLEZ GUEVARA, Manuel, MANZO HERNÁNDEZ, Martín, and ALEGRE TAMEZ, Eduardo
- Abstract
Background and objective. Multiple mastopexy techniques have been described, however, reports of long-term results in different techniques are scarce. The inverted-T and periaerolar techniques continue to be the most used, reason why we describe our experience with the long-term comparison of the two techniques. Methods. A longitudinal, comparative, observational, retrospective study comparing aesthetic satisfaction, speed of recovery and the probability of long-term associated complications was carried out in 97 mastopexy cases: 48 operated with the inverted-T technique and 49 with the periareolar technique. The homogenization of the data was analyzed with the x² and Fisher tests and the odds ratio (OR, 95% CI) was used as a measure of association between the surgical technique used and the probability of presenting complications. Results. At 5 years, of 48 patients who declared satisfaction of 100-80% all were operated with the inverted-T technique (p <0.001). For both the inverted T technique and the periareolar technique, the p-value according to the Friedman test for related samples was <0.000. Conclusions. In our experience, the periareolar mastopexy pattern has less satisfaction and more long-term complications than the inverted-T technique, from which we conclude that the periareolar mastopexy pattern is recommended in patients with grade I mammary ptosis and/or with small volume breast implants; mastopexy with the inverted-T technique has more satisfaction and fewer long-term complications like widening of the nipple-areola complex and breast asymmetry. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF