Search

his is the sixth annual summary of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. This summary addresses the most recently published resuscitation evidence reviewed by International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Task Force science experts. Topics covered by systematic reviews include cardiopulmonary resuscitation during transport; approach to resuscitation after drowning; passive ventilation; minimizing pauses during cardiopulmonary resuscitation; temperature management after cardiac arrest; use of diagnostic point-of-care ultrasound during cardiac arrest; use of vasopressin and corticosteroids during cardiac arrest; coronary angiography after cardiac arrest; public-access defibrillation devices for children; pediatric early warning systems; maintaining normal temperature immediately after birth; suctioning of amniotic fluid at birth; tactile stimulation for resuscitation immediately after birth; use of continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress at term birth; respiratory and heart rate monitoring in the delivery room; supraglottic airway use in neonates; prearrest prediction of in-hospital cardiac arrest mortality; basic life support training for likely rescuers of high-risk populations; effect of resuscitation team training; blended learning for life support training; training and recertification for resuscitation instructors; and recovery position for maintenance of breathing and prevention of cardiac arrest. Members from 6 task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the quality of the evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria and generated consensus treatment recommendations. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in the Justification and Evidence-to-Decision Framework Highlights sections, and priority knowledge gaps for future research are listed. This is the sixth annual summary of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. This summary addresses the most recently published resuscitation evidence reviewed by International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Task Force science experts. Topics covered by systematic reviews include cardiopulmonary resuscitation during transport; approach to resuscitation after drowning; passive ventilation; minimizing pauses during cardiopulmonary resuscitation; temperature management after cardiac arrest; use of diagnostic point-of-care ultrasound during cardiac arrest; use of vasopressin and corticosteroids during cardiac arrest; coronary angiography after cardiac arrest; public-access defibrillation devices for children; pediatric early warning systems; maintaining normal temperature immediately after birth; suctioning of amniotic fluid at birth; tactile stimulation for resuscitation immediately after birth; use of continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress at term birth; respiratory and heart rate monitoring in the delivery room; supraglottic airway use in neonates; prearrest prediction of in-hospital cardiac arrest mortality; basic life support training for likely rescuers of high-risk populations; effect of resuscitation team training; blended learning for life support training; training and recertification for resuscitation instructors; and recovery position for maintenance of breathing and prevention of cardiac arrest. Members from 6 task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the quality of the evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria and generated consensus treatment recommendations. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in the Justification and Evidence-to-Decision Framework Highlights sections, and priority knowledge gaps for future research are listed.

This is the summary publication of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation's 2020 International Consensus on First Aid Science With Treatment Recommendations. It addresses the most recent published evidence reviewed by the First Aid Task Force science experts. This summary addresses the topics of first aid methods of glucose administration for hypoglycemia; techniques for cooling of exertional hyperthermia and heatstroke; recognition of acute stroke; the use of supplementary oxygen in acute stroke; early or first aid use of aspirin for chest pain; control of life- threatening bleeding through the use of tourniquets, haemostatic dressings, direct pressure, or pressure devices; the use of a compression wrap for closed extremity joint injuries; and temporary storage of an avulsed tooth. Additional summaries of scoping reviews are presented for the use of a recovery position, recognition of a concussion, and 6 other first aid topics. The First Aid Task Force has assessed, discussed, and debated the certainty of evidence on the basis of Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria and present their consensus treatment recommendations with evidence-to-decision highlights and identified priority knowledge gaps for future research. The 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and Emergency Cardiovascular Care (ECC) Science With Treatment Recommendations (CoSTR) is the fourth in a series of annual summary publications from the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR). This 2020 CoSTR for first aid includes new topics addressed by systematic reviews performed within the past 12 months. It also includes updates of the first aid treatment recommendations published from 2010 through 2019 that are based on additional evidence evaluations and updates. As a result, this 2020 CoSTR for first aid represents the most comprehensive update since 2010.

The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation has initiated a continuous review of new, peer-reviewed, published cardiopulmonary resuscitation science. This is the third annual summary of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. It addresses the most recent published resuscitation evidence reviewed by International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Task Force science experts. This summary addresses the role of cardiac arrest centers and dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation, the role of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults and children, vasopressors in adults, advanced airway interventions in adults and children, targeted temperature management in children after cardiac arrest, initial oxygen concentration during resuscitation of newborns, and interventions for presyncope by first aid providers. Members from 6 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the certainty of the evidence on the basis of the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria, and their statements include consensus treatment recommendations. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in the Justification and Evidence to Decision Framework Highlights sections. The task forces also listed priority knowledge gaps for further research.

Introduction: In Japan, the number of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) placed in public areas has climbed up to the estimated 530,000. We reported previously that a half of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests occurred within 100 m from a public AED in urban areas. However, shocks for defibrillation were given to less than 15% of those patients. The objectives of this study was to identify the limiting factors against the use of AEDs by bystanders. Methods: A prospective survey on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was conducted in the city of Osaka (Dec 2016 through Mar 2017) and the city of Nagoya (Dec 2016 through Nov 2017) searching for patient demographics and AED settings including; absence/presence of a public AED on the scene, attachment of AED pads, delivery of shocks before the time of EMS arrival. Results: Of 558 cases of cardiac arrest registered during the survey period, an AED had already been delivered at the patient side by the time of EMS arrival in 92 case (16.5%). Of those, pads had been attached in 89 cased (96.7%). Shocks had been advised in 35 cases (39.3%) and to all but one of those cases at least 1 shock had been given by the bystanders. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups of cases with and without AEDs at the patient side regarding the patient age (65 years [IQR: 48-74] vs 63 years [IQR49-75], p=0.84), gender (p=0.68) and the time from call to EMS arrival (7 min [IQR: 6-9] vs 7 min [IQR: 6-9], p=0.74). Cases occurring indoors had more chances of AEDs being delivered on the patient side than cases occurring outdoors (24.0% vs 7.8%, p Conclusions: Our study indicates that once an AED is delivered at the patient side, pads are successfully attached and shocks are given if indicated in almost all cases. This suggests that finding and delivering an AED onto the patient side are the limiting factors against the use of AEDs by bystanders. In order to popularize the use of AEDs by bystanders, informing people with AED placement and clear direction to the AED location seem to be the key steps.

Introduction: Although quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a key to increase survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), little is known about the quality of bystander CPR and its association with survival outcomes after OHCA. Objective: To evaluate the association of quality of bystander CPR and patient outcomes after OHCA. Methods: Designs: Population-based cohort study. Cases: All OHCA cases treated by emergency medical services (EMS) personnel in Toyonaka city between September 2011 and August 2013. Data collection and analyses: EMS personnel assessed bystanders’ CPR quality including hand position, depth, and tempo of chest compressions using a specific data form at the scene. Fleiss’ Kappa statistics was used to assess the evaluation reliability among EMS personnel and the Kappa value was 0.81 before the study. The primary outcome was patient one-month survival with favorable neurological outcome and it was compared between the good-quality CPR group and the poor-quality CPR group. Results: Among 877 cases, bystander CPR was attempted in 429 (48.9%). Data on quality of CPR was applicable in 272 (63.4%) of them. In the good-quality CPR group, bystanders were younger, more likely to be health care provider, and have experience of CPR training than in the poor-quality of CPR group. The proportion of patients with neurologically favorable one-month survival was somewhat greater in the good-quality of CPR group (4.6% versus 3.0%), although it was statistically insignificant. Conclusions: Better quality of bystander chest compressions might increase OHCA patient survival. Further efforts to improve quality of CPR by general public are needed.

Introduction: We have previously estimated the cost of and quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained with ~200,000 AEDs placed in Japan between 2004 through 2009, and reported that the maximum likelihood estimate (MLE) of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) to be ~$93,980/QALY. To evaluate the robustness of the estimated ICER, we conducted a sensitivity analysis using Monte Carlo simulation. Methods: Over the study period, 3,927 patients received public access defibrillation (PAD). A control group was created by extracting, from the national database, another group of 3,927 cardiac arrest patients who did not receive PADs but otherwise matched with regard to confounders including age, sex, response time and others. The difference of the total QALY in the 2 groups yielded incremental effectiveness gained by the PAD program. The sum of the total cost for AED purchase and maintenance, cost of BLS training for first responders, and differential cost for medical care yielded the incremental cost. The value for each variable needed to calculate the incremental cost and effectiveness was randomly varied in such a way that followed the pre-defined probability density function (Table). Monte Carlo simulation was repeated 10,000 times to estimate the MLE and its 95% CI for ICER. Results: The MLE (95% CI) for the incremental cost and incremental effectiveness was ~$ 580 million (577- 583 million) and ~7,559 (6,298- 8,858) QALY, yielding ICER of $77,320 ($65,503- 92,017) /QALY (figure). Conclusions: Our estimate of the ICER seemed to be relatively robust to several assumptions. The ICER of the whole Japan PAD program seemed to be higher than desirable but still acceptable.

Background: We developed a new device for quantifying capillary refill time (CRT) by applying the pulse oximeter principle, and reported the excellent correlation between quantitative CRT (Q-CRT) and tissue hypoperfusion status as represented by arterial blood lactate levels in critically ill patients in the pilot study. Methods: Diagnostic accuracy study was undergone in ICU of a tertiary emergency medical center. While the pulse oxygen saturation sensor was placed on the finger of the patients, transmitted light intensity was measured with a pulse oximeter (OLV-3100, Nihon Kohden Corp., Japan) before start and during compression of the finger. Correlation between delta Ab, defined as the absorbance of light intensity of infra-red (A-ir) minus that of red (A-r), and arterial blood lactate level was analyzed. Results: The delta Ab was analyzed a total of 69 waveforms in 23 patients. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the delta Ab less than 0.06 for predicting a lactate level more than 2.0 mmol/l were 100%, 93%, 89%, 100%, respectively. Conclusions: The delta Ab was well correlated to high level of blood lactate level in critically ill patients. Further study will confirm to place the delta Ab as one of non-invasive predictors of tissue perfusion status.

Previous reports have described several facility categories as important locations for public access defibrillation (PAD) program. However, in decision-making process as to what specific facilities may deserve PAD programs, each facility needs to estimate the number of shockable cardiac arrest (CA). Such estimation depends not only on the expected number of visitors/workers but also on the profile of the visitors/workers, which may vary among types of facilities. [Methods] Nagoya City has a population of 2.2 million with ~2,000 CA annually. Locations of CA were abstracted from data collected by Nagoya FD from 2003 through 2007. Types of public facilities were tallied and grouped into 36 categories consistent with Ordinance for Enforcement of Fire Service Act, and the number of CA within each category was determined. Data on the number of visitors/workers in each category were collected from governmental databases on metropolitan statistics. The incidence rate was calculated as numbers of all CA and CA with VF per 1 billion person.year. [Results] In 8 location categories, the databases for CA and the database for numbers of visitors/workers coincided in the categorization rules of the locations. The incidence rates are shows in the table . [Discussion] The incidence rate of shockable CA varies substantially among the location categories, presumably reflecting the variations of age distribution, average length of stay and intensity of physical activities of people who gather there. Schools (teachers) and factories have the highest incidence of shockable CA. However, our data may indicate that a school with small numbers of workers (teachers) may have a low priority of a PAD program. On the contrary, a station with low incidence rate of 0.05 may be a preferred target of a PAD program if a large number of travelers are expected to pass through. Thus our study provides fundamental data to detect important and cost-effective target locations of a PAD program. Number of CA per 1 billion preson.year

Background: In Japan, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) became popular for cardiac arrest patients who resist conventional advanced life supports. Regardless of many clinical experiences, there has been no previous systematic literature review. Methods: Case series, reports and proceedings of scientific meeting about ECPR for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest written in Japanese between January 1, 1983 and July 31, 2007 were collected with Japana Centra Revuo Medicina (medical publication database in Japan) and review by experts. The outcome and characteristics of the patients were investigated, and the influence of publication bias of the case series study was also examined by the Funnel Plot method. Results: There were 951 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients who received ECPR in 92 reports (including 59 case series and 33 case reports) during the period. The average of age was 38.1 (4 – 88) years old and 76.1% was male. Three hundreds and eighty-one cases (40.1%) were arrests of cardiac etiology, and 212 were non-cardiac (22.3%). The cause of arrest was not described in other 37.6%. Excluding reports for only one case, weighted survival rate at discharge of 792 cases those were clearly described the outcome was 39.5±10.0%. When the relationship between the number of cases and the survival rate at discharge in each 59 case series study was shown in figure by the Funnel Plot method, the plotted data presented the reverse-funnel type that centered on the average of survival rate of all. Conclusions: The influence of publication bias of previous reports in Japan was relatively low. ECPR can greatly contribute to improve the outcome of out-of hospital cardiac arrests.

We developed the AED enlightenment animation DVD (the AED Animation) as a readable and friendly educational material for learning cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and AED by citizens. The aim of the present study was to investigate how well did schoolchildren understand the contents of the AED Animation, and how the AED Animation has educational and ripple effects to schoolchildren. [Methods] Prior to the investigation of schoolchildren, 28 elementary school teachers watched the AED Animation and answered a questionnaire to see if the AED animation arouse schoolchildren, and to evaluate its psychological and educational impacts. Then in fourth, fifthand sixth grades elementary school students (total of 1189) watched the AED Animation and answered questionnaire-based survey. [Results] 94 percent of the students answered “ the AED Animation is good for me”, 80 percent of them wanted to be able to do CPR and use AED as the characters of the AED Animation did, and 67 percent of them wanted there parents to watch the AED Animation. [Conclusions] The AED Animation is a good educational material for schoolchildren that raises interest in AED/CPR, and its educational effects was more than elementary school teachers expected.

BACKGROUND SOS-KANTO study showed that bystander chest compression-only resuscitation was the preferable approach to resuscitation for adult patients with witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest ( Lancet 2007 ; 369 ), but few clinical studies have focused on the efficacy of basic resuscitation with chest compression only for patients with unwitnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. METHODS SOS-KANTO study was conducted in 58 emergency hospitals and emergency medical service units. On arrival at the scene, paramedics assessed the technique of basic resuscitation and asked additional questions. The primary endpoint was favorable neurological outcome 30 days after cardiac arrest. RESULTS Of the 9,592 patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, 4,347 adult patients with unwitnessed arrest were included; 385 (8.9%) received chest compression-only resuscitation, 507 (11.7%) received chest compression plus mouth-to-mouth ventilation resuscitation, and 3,456 (79.5%) received no resuscitation. Any resuscitation attempt was associated with a higher proportion of the favorable neurological outcome than no resuscitation (1.1% vs. 0.4%, p=0.009). The chest compression-only resuscitation group had higher proportions of the favorable neurological outcome than the no resuscitation group in the whole cohort (1.3% vs. 0.4%, p=0.018) and in the subgroups of patients with cardiac causes (2.0% vs. 0.6%, p=0.018) and with time interval from EMS call to arrival at patient’s side for ≤ 8 min (2.0% vs. 0.6%, p=0.020). However, the chest compression-only resuscitation group had a similar proportion of the favorable neurological outcome than the chest compression plus ventilation resuscitation in the whole cohort (1.3% vs. 1.0%, p=0.662) and there was no evidence for any benefit from the addition of ventilation in any subgroups. The adjusted odds ratios for the favorable neurological outcome after chest compression-only resuscitation and after chest compression plus ventilation resuscitation were 3.4 (95% CI, 1.1 to 10.5, p=0.033) and 3.3 (95% CI, 1.1 to 10.1 p=0.035). CONCLUSIONS Basic resuscitation with chest compression only is the preferable approach to resuscitation even though the adult patients with unwitnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

BACKGROUND AHA guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) have recommended that administration of atropine can be considered for asystole or pulseless electrical activity (PEA), because atropine has improved survival to hospital admission in a retrospective review (Ann Emerg Med, 1984), and is inexpensive, easy to administer, and has few side effects. However, there are insufficient data in humans. METHODS We assessed the effects of atropine in 7,443 adults patients with asystole or PEA arrest from the SOS-KANTO study: a prospective, multicenter, observational trial. The medications for asystole or PEA arrest were managed according to the advanced cardiovascular life support algorithm of the CPR guidelines (i.e. a 1-mg dose of epinephrine was administered intravenously every 3 to 5 minutes and a1-mg dose of atropine was administered intravenously every 3 to 5 minutes; maximum total of 3 doses). The primary endpoint was a favorable neurological outcome 30 days after cardiac arrest. RESULTS Of the 7,443 adult patients who had out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with asystole or PEA, I,708(23%) were treated with epinephrine and atropine and 5,735(77%) were treated with epinephrine. At baseline, the epinephrine and atropine group had significantly higher proportions of cardiac cause, witnessed arrest, and bystander CPR attempt than the epinephrine group. However, the two groups had a similar frequency of the favorable neurological outcome (0.3% in each group, p=0.805). Multiple logistic-regression analysis showed that the adjusted odds ratio for the favorable neurological outcome was 0.6 (95% CI 0.2–1.7, p=0.37) after epinephrine and atropine (compared with epinephrine). On the other hand, the epinephrine and atropine group had significantly higher rate of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) than the epinephrine group (35% vs. 23%, p CONCLUSIONS We demonstrated that administration of atropine during management of asystole or PEA arrest did not increase the frequency of favorable neurological outcome, although the atropine favored initial ROSC.