1. Abstract 17298: Validation of Beat-to-Beat Blood Pressure and Left Ventricular Ejection Time by the Caretaker Physiological Monitor Against Invasive Central Aortic Measurement
- Author
-
Martin Baruch, Sung-Hoon Kim, Evan Harmon, Sula Mazimba, Lawrence W. Gimple, Patrick Stafford, and Younghoon Kwon
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Blood pressure ,business.industry ,Physiology (medical) ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Cardiology ,Left Ventricular Ejection Time ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Beat (music) - Abstract
Objective: There is an unmet need for noninvasive continuous blood pressure (BP) monitoring technologies in various clinical settings. We examined the accuracy of noninvasive Caretaker device against invasively measured central aortic BP. Methods: Beat-to-beat BP by Caretaker was recorded simultaneously with central aortic BP measured in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. We derived correlations and Bland-Altman comparisons, after calibrating the Caretaker with 20 seconds of the initial catheter readings, as well as trend analyses for both systolic (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP). We also measured left ventricular ejection time (LVET) from both aortic pressure tracing and Caretaker and compared the two. Results: A total of 47 patients were included in the study. A total of 31,369 beats obtained during the diagnostic portion of coronary angiogram were used for analysis. The correlations for SBP and DBP were 0.89 and 0.78, respectively (p < 0.001 for both). The Bland-Altman comparison yielded overall mean differences of 2.11 mmHg (SD 7.40) for SBP and 1.46 mmHg (SD 6.12) for DBP respectively (p Conclusion: Beat-to-beat BP by Caretaker showed excellent agreement and high concordance in the direction and the degree of BP change with central aortic BP. This study supports the satisfactory performance of the Caretaker device in continuous tracking of beat-to-beat BP and LVET measurements.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF