Search

Background: The anti-ischemic agent trimetazidine improves ejection fraction in heart failure that is hypothetically linked to inhibitory effects on cardiac free fatty acid (FFA) oxidation. However, FFA oxidation remains unmeasured in humans. We investigated the effects of trimetazidine on cardiac perfusion, efficiency of work, and FFA oxidation in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy., Methods and Results: Nineteen nondiabetic patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy on standard medication were randomized to single-blind trimetazidine (n=12) or placebo (n=7) for 3 months. Myocardial perfusion, FFA, and total oxidative metabolism were measured using positron emission tomography with [(15)O]H(2)O, [(11)C]acetate, and [(11)C]palmitate. Cardiac function was assessed echocardiographically; insulin sensitivity was assessed by the homeostasis model assessment index. Trimetazidine increased ejection fraction from 30.9+/-8.5% to 34.8+/-12% (P=0.027 versus placebo). Myocardial FFA uptake was unchanged, and beta-oxidation rate constant decreased only 10%. Myocardial perfusion, oxidative metabolism, and work efficiency remained unchanged. Trimetazidine decreased insulin resistance (glucose: 5.9+/-0.7 versus 5.5+/-0.6 mmol/L, P=0.047; insulin: 10+/-6.9 versus 7.6+/-3.6 mU/L, P=0.031; homeostasis model assessment index: 2.75+/-2.28 versus 1.89+/-1.06, P=0.027). The degree of beta-blockade and trimetazidine interacted positively on ejection fraction. Plasma high-density lipoprotein concentrations increased 11% (P<0.001)., Conclusions: In idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy with heart failure, trimetazidine increased cardiac function and had both cardiac and extracardiac metabolic effects. Cardiac FFA oxidation modestly decreased and myocardial oxidative rate was unchanged, implying increased oxidation of glucose. Trimetazidine improved whole-body insulin sensitivity and glucose control in these insulin-resistant idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy patients, thus hypothetically countering the myocardial damage of insulin resistance. Additionally, the trimetazidine-induced increase in ejection fraction was associated with greater beta1-adrenoceptor occupancy, suggesting a synergistic mechanism.

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease results in >19 million deaths annually, and coronary heart disease accounts for the majority of this toll. Despite major advances in treatment of coronary heart disease patients, a large number of victims of the disease who are apparently healthy die suddenly without prior symptoms. Available screening and diagnostic methods are insufficient to identify the victims before the event occurs. The recognition of the role of the vulnerable plaque has opened new avenues of opportunity in the field of cardiovascular medicine. This consensus document concludes the following. (1) Rupture-prone plaques are not the only vulnerable plaques. All types of atherosclerotic plaques with high likelihood of thrombotic complications and rapid progression should be considered as vulnerable plaques. We propose a classification for clinical as well as pathological evaluation of vulnerable plaques. (2) Vulnerable plaques are not the only culprit factors for the development of acute coronary syndromes, myocardial infarction, and sudden cardiac death. Vulnerable blood (prone to thrombosis) and vulnerable myocardium (prone to fatal arrhythmia) play an important role in the outcome. Therefore, the term "vulnerable patient" may be more appropriate and is proposed now for the identification of subjects with high likelihood of developing cardiac events in the near future. (3) A quantitative method for cumulative risk assessment of vulnerable patients needs to be developed that may include variables based on plaque, blood, and myocardial vulnerability. In Part I of this consensus document, we cover the new definition of vulnerable plaque and its relationship with vulnerable patients. Part II of this consensus document focuses on vulnerable blood and vulnerable myocardium and provide an outline of overall risk assessment of vulnerable patients. Parts I and II are meant to provide a general consensus and overviews the new field of vulnerable patient. Recently developed assays (eg, C-reactive protein), imaging techniques (eg, CT and MRI), noninvasive electrophysiological tests (for vulnerable myocardium), and emerging catheters (to localize and characterize vulnerable plaque) in combination with future genomic and proteomic techniques will guide us in the search for vulnerable patients. It will also lead to the development and deployment of new therapies and ultimately to reduce the incidence of acute coronary syndromes and sudden cardiac death. We encourage healthcare policy makers to promote translational research for screening and treatment of vulnerable patients.