Search

Introduction: Diabetes mellitus (DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are comorbidities of great therapeutic and prognostic importance in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Knowledge about their prevalence, associated factors and influence on optimal medical therapy are needed to best manage this population. Methods: This is a unicentric cross-sectional analysis of 869 patients enrolled in a CAD registry in Brazil. To be included, patients needed to have a previous coronary artery revascularization procedure (either percutaneous or surgical), documented previous acute coronary syndrome, or known coronary stenosis greater than 50%. CKD was defined as creatinine clearance < 60 mL/min. DM was defined as prescription of glucose-lowering drugs or a HbA1c > 6.5%. Results: Overall, mean age was 64.7 years, 261 (30%) were women, 528 (61%) had previous myocardial infarction, and 547 (63.4%) had a previous revascularization procedure. DM was prevalent in 449 (51.7%) patients and CKD in 280 (32.2%). Both comorbidities were concomitant in 151 (17.4%) patients. On multivariate analysis, CKD was correlated to female sex (OR 2.94; 95%CI 1.88-4.67), age (OR 1.20; 95%CI 1.16-1.23), BMI (OR 0.80, 95%CI 0.76-0.84), and HDL-cholesterol (OR 0.97; 95%CI 0.96-0.99). DM was associated with age (OR 1.02, 95%CI 1.00-1.04), BMI (OR 1.05, 95%CI 1.01-1.08), high blood pressure (OR 2.1, 95%CI 1.39-3.21), and heart rate (OR 1.02, 95%CI 1.00-1.03). Concomitant presence of CKD and DM was associated with age (OR 1.09, 95%CI 1.06-1.13) and left ventricular ejection fraction (OR 0.97, 95%CI 0.95-0.98). Patients with DM were more likely to receive ACE inhibitors or ARBs (79.3% x 67.1%, p< 0.001) and calcium channel blockers (41.9% x 31.2%, p=0.001). Patients with DM and CKD had higher use of nitrates (38.4% x 25.6%, p=0.002). There was no difference in the prescription of antithrombotic drugs, beta-blockers or statins between groups. Conclusion: DM and CKD are both very prevalent comorbidities in patients with CAD. They are associated with age and risk markers such as high blood pressure and lower left ventricular ejection fraction. Although typically these populations are undertreated in others registries, this fact was not observed in our study.

Introduction: It is well established that moderate consumption of red wine is associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular (CV) events. Many observational studies have shown that this same benefit could be seen with other alcohol beverages different from wine. However, the correlation between the Brazilian sugarcane liquor (“cachaca”) and CV benefit has not been demonstrated in human trials. Hypothesis: Cachaca causes changes in biomarkers of CV risk in the same proportion as wine. Methods: In this crossover randomized study, healthy individuals were initially designated to have daily moderate alcohol consumption (MAC) of either cachaca or red wine for a period of 4 weeks. MAC, for both drinks, was denoted as a daily dose equivalent of 28g of alcohol for men and 14g for women. Then, after an abstinence period of 7 days, drink types were switched for more 4 weeks. Analysis of CV risk biomarkers were determined before and after each intervention, and consisted of C-reactive protein, lipid profile, platelet aggregability and glycid profile. (This research was funded by FAPESP 2018/09675-4). Results: Of the 37 individuals originally enrolled, 2 refused to continue the study. The average age of the individuals was 41.7 (±15.3 years) and 43.2% were men. Adherence to the protocol was considered essentially ideal, with 100% of regular use in both interventions and only 3 individuals reporting abuse during the study period. There was no significant variation in anthropometric measurements during the study, except for a weight gain (0.6kg) with red wine (p = 0.011). As seen in the table, no significant changes were noted in the inflammatory markers, lipid profile, platelet aggregability nor glycid profile before and after each intervention. Conclusions: This study shows that in healthy individuals, neither red wine nor cachaca changed CV biomarkers related to atherosclerotic progression after 4 weeks of MAC. However, there was a marked weight gain with daily wine consumption.

Background— The importance of complete revascularization remains unclear and contradictory. This current investigation compares the effect of complete revascularization on 10-year survival of patients with stable multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) who were randomly assigned to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). Methods and Results— This is a post hoc analysis of the Second Medicine, Angioplasty, or Surgery Study (MASS II), which is a randomized trial comparing treatments in patients with stable multivessel CAD, and preserved systolic ventricular function. We analyzed patients who underwent surgery (CABG) or stent angioplasty (PCI). The survival free of overall mortality of patients who underwent complete (CR) or incomplete revascularization (IR) was compared. Of the 408 patients randomly assigned to mechanical revascularization, 390 patients (95.6%) underwent the assigned treatment; complete revascularization was achieved in 224 patients (57.4%), 63.8% of those in the CABG group and 36.2% in the PCI group ( P =0.001). The IR group had more prior myocardial infarction than the CR group (56.2%×39.2%, P =0.01). During a 10-year follow-up, the survival free of cardiovascular mortality was significantly different among patients in the 2 groups (CR, 90.6% versus IR, 84.4%; P =0.04). This was mainly driven by an increased cardiovascular specific mortality in individuals with incomplete revascularization submitted to PCI ( P =0.05). Conclusions— Our study suggests that in 10-year follow-up, CR compared with IR was associated with reduced cardiovascular mortality, especially due to a higher increase in cardiovascular-specific mortality in individuals submitted to PCI. Clinical Trial Registration Information— URL: http://www.controlled-trials.com . Registration number: ISRCTN66068876.

Background— Coronary artery bypass graft surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass is a safe, routine procedure. Nevertheless, significant morbidity remains, mostly because of the body’s response to the nonphysiological nature of cardiopulmonary bypass. Few data are available on the effects of off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery (OPCAB) on cardiac events and long-term clinical outcomes. Methods and Results— In a single-center randomized trial, 308 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery were randomly assigned: 155 to OPCAB and 153 to on-pump CAB (ONCAB). Primary composite end points were death, myocardial infarction, further revascularization (surgery or angioplasty), or stroke. After 5-year follow-up, the primary composite end point was not different between groups (hazard ratio 0.71, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.22; P =0.21). A statistical difference was found between OPCAB and ONCAB groups in the duration of surgery (240±65 versus 300±87.5 minutes; P P P P P P P Conclusions— No difference was found between groups in the primary composite end point at 5-years follow-up. Although OPCAB surgery was related to a lower number of grafts and higher episodes of atrial fibrillation, it had no significant implications related to long-term outcomes. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.controlled-trials.com. Unique identifier: ISRCTN66068876.

Background— This study compared the 10-year follow-up of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery surgery (CABG), and medical treatment (MT) in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease, stable angina, and preserved ventricular function. Methods and Results— The primary end points were overall mortality, Q-wave myocardial infarction, or refractory angina that required revascularization. All data were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. At a single institution, 611 patients were randomly assigned to CABG (n=203), PCI (n=205), or MT (n=203). The 10-year survival rates were 74.9% with CABG, 75.1% with PCI, and 69% with MT ( P =0.089). The 10-year rates of myocardial infarction were 10.3% with CABG, 13.3% with PCI, and 20.7% with MT ( P P P Conclusions— Compared with CABG, MT was associated with a significantly higher incidence of subsequent myocardial infarction, a higher rate of additional revascularization, a higher incidence of cardiac death, and consequently a 2.29-fold increased risk of combined events. PCI was associated with an increased need for further revascularization, a higher incidence of myocardial infarction, and a 1.46-fold increased risk of combined events compared with CABG. Additionally, CABG was better than MT at eliminating anginal symptoms. Clinical Trial Registration Information— URL: http://www.controlled-trials.com. Registration number: ISRCTN66068876.

Background— Prior comparisons of costs following CABG and PTCA have demonstrated higher initial costs after CABG but following PTCA, recurrent symptoms and repeat revascularization result in increased late costs and over time their costs equilibrate. The MASS II trial provides an opportunity to compare the costs of CABG and PTCA in addition to a strategy of medical therapy. Methods— We studied the 611 patients of MASS II [Medical (203), Angioplasty (205), or Surgery (203) Study], a randomized study to compare treatments for multivessel CAD and preserved left ventricle function. The costs were: CABG US$ 10 650.00; PTCA US$ 6400.00; new AMI hospitalization AMI U$ 2550; angiography not followed-up of PTCA US$ 1900.00; and medication US$ 1200.00 for medical, and US$ 1000.00 for the other groups. We did adjustment for average event-free time, and angina-free proportion. The statistical analysis carried out was chi-square, t test, and analysis of variance. Results— After 1 year, 49% Medical, 79% PTCA, and 88% CABG became angina-free; P P =0.03); PTCA was performed in 7 Medical, 17 PTCA, and 1 CABG, ( P =0.0003), CABG was performed in 15 Medical, 8 PTCA, and zero CABG; P =0.002. The event-free and event and angina-free-costs in the first year were US$ 2453.50 and US$5006.32 for Medical; US$ 10348,43; and US$ 13 099.31 for PTCA; and US$ 12 404.21 and US$ 14 095.09 for CABG group. An increase from expected costs of 317%, 77%, and 21%, respectively. Conclusion— PTCA effective costs were similar to CAGB costs, Medical treatment presented the lowest cost, and however, the greatest increment, and CABG presented the most stable costs.