Search

Design: Qualitative. Participants and context: A direct responsibility for the RSU program of each university that participated as host-visitor. Method: Observation and discussion in the field joint evaluation of each program based on the items that make up the primer. Results: Institution A and B obtained 8 and 2 points respectively. Conclusions: In addition to the technical and engineering aspects, it is necessary to use and / or design instruments (qualitative or quantitative), for the comparative analysis of cases of programs included in plans Environmental impacts. î‚Še institutional evaluation of environmental aspects should be a constant practice in inter-institutional collaborations that favor better performance and not internal self-complacency. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]