Search

ObjectiveTo validate the hypothesis that there exists an optimal axial compression stress range to enhance tibial fracture healing.MethodsRabbits with a surgically induced V-shaped tibial fracture were separated into 2 main groups: the control group (C Group, n=6) without application of any axial compression stress stimulation postoperatively and the stimulation group (S Group, n=90). The S Group was further divided into 20 subgroups (S11 to S54) in terms of 5 axial compression stress stimulation levels (112.8 kPa, 289.8 kPa, 396.5 kPa, 472.7 kPa, and 602.3 kPa) and 4 experimental endpoints (1, 3, 5 and 8 weeks after operation). A custom made circular external fixator was used to provide the axial compression stress of the fracture sites. Based on X-ray observation, a fracture healing scoring system was created to evaluate the fracture healing process.ResultsAt 8 weeks after operation, there existed a “∩–shape” relationship between healing score and axial compression stress stimulation level of fracture site. The optimal axial compression stress stimulation ranged from 289.8 kPa to 472.7 kPa, accompanying the best fracture healing, i.e. the fracture line became indistinct or almost disappeared, and a lot of callus jointed the two fracture ends. Meanwhile, at 5 weeks after operation, corresponding to the relatively low healing scores, there was a fracture healing performance similar to that at 8 weeks. Besides, at 1 or 3 weeks after operation, for all the axial compression stress levels (0-602.3 kPa), no obvious healing effect was found.ConclusionsIt is implied from the stated X-ray observation results in this study that the potential optimal axial compression stress stimulation and optimal fracture healing time are available. The axial compression stress level of 289.8-472.7 kPa and fracture healing time of more than 8 weeks jointly comprise the optimal axial compression stress stimulation conditions to enhance tibial fracture healing.

ObjectiveTo prospectively evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of the percutaneous pedicle screw fixation through the pedicle of fractured vertebra in the treatment of type A thoracolumbar fractures using Sextant system in the retrospective non-randomized case-control study.MethodsA total of 38 consecutive non-randomized patients with type A thoracolumbar fractures, which had been stabilized posteriorly from December 2006 to March 2009, were examined retrospectively more than 9 months after surgery. Twenty-one patients had been treated conventionally with open pedicle screw fixation (OPSF) and 17 patients received minimally invasive treatment with Sextant percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (SPPSF). As a method of evaluation, the incision size, the intraoperation and postoperative volume of blood loss, operation time, postoperative hospital stay, blood transfusion, the radiological assessment of the sagittal Cobb's angle, vertebral body angle and vertebral body height were recorded and compared.ResultsAll patients were followed up for 8–24 months (average 11.6 months). There were significant differences in the incision size, surgical blood loss, surgical draining loss, operation time, hospital stay after operation, blood transfusion, the proportion of antalgic supplement and postoperative incisional VAS between the two groups (P0.05), but there was significant difference in the postoperative anterior height of the fractured vertebra between the two groups (P