Search

Abstract: Research has documented heterosexism and genderism facing lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and questioning (LGBTQQ) students in schools, especially as it relates to experiencing bullying and harassment. However, little research addresses anti-LGBTQQ bullying interventions, and no research has examined the use of youth-led performance and dialogue in cultivating anti-bullying behaviors among students. The present mixed-methods study assesses one such intervention led by a community-based LGBTQQ and allied youth group. Repeated measures general linear modeling demonstrates a positive impact of this intervention on middle and high school students' likelihood to intervene when witnessing anti-LGBTQQ harassment and confidence to successfully do so, particularly for White students. Qualitative findings demonstrate barriers to intervention and decision-making processes of youth when intervening. Results suggest the importance of these interventions in empowering LGBTQQ youth to effect change in their schools. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Bullying and harassment are systemic problems in schools, especially for sexual minority youth. Previous research suggests the importance of addressing student intervention in cases of bullying, but little is known about how to encourage this kind of intervention, particularly in response to anti-LGBTQ bullying. The present study used data collected through a participatory action research project to examine three factors'' impact on students'' intentions to intervene: hearing homophobic language, seeing teachers intervene, and seeing other students intervene. In the final model, seeing other students intervene (β=.19, p<.001) had a more significant positive effect on a students'' own likelihood to intervene than seeing teachers intervene (β=.07, p<.05). In multivariate analysis, frequency of hearing homophobic language did not impact student''s likelihood to intervene. Findings suggest the importance of youth leadership in multi-level anti-bullying programs. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

• Exposure to curriculum on race linked with higher intervention in anti-LGBTQ behaviors. • LGBTQ Curricular content not linked with higher intervention in anti-LGBTQ behaviors. • Frequency of hearing anti-LGBTQ speech positively related to intervention behaviors. • Overt slurs were negatively associated with likely intervention behaviors. • Cisgender heterosexual girls/women reported greater intervention behaviors. Research suggests that, through direct intervention and role modeling, student peers may be particularly well-suited to address bullying and discrimination based on gender and sexuality. To investigate the factors predicting students' self-reported intervention behaviors when witnessing harassment based on sexual orientation and gender identity, this study analyzes youth-led survey data collected at five Midwestern high schools (n = 1046). The sample was majority white (65.8%), cisgender (90.8%), and heterosexual (78.4%). We found that in addition to overall school climate and witnessing others intervene, schools having race-related curriculum significantly predicted intervention behaviors around gender and sexuality and that LGBTQ-related curricula did not predict such actions. The authors propose that the discrepancy may be due to an association between race curricula and social justice frameworks, in contrast with the emphasis on individuality and health in LGBTQ-inclusive curricula. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Presents a case study of youth participatory research in an urban school district. • Conceptualizes youth participatory research as tool for informing school policies. • Explore the tensions of youth participatory research in a school district. • Discusses navigating power, racial injustice, youth voice and adult roles in schools. • Offers practical suggestions for school interested in youth participatory research. Drawing upon a large district-wide initiative to systematically use youth participatory research in all middle and high schools as a way to address the racial disproportionality in school experience and disciplinary actions, this paper conceptualizes youth participatory research as a tool to bring youth voices to inform school climate and school policies. The program, which began in 2015, has involved teams from 31 middle and high schools from across the district to use youth participatory evaluation to examine school climate, racial disproportionality, discipline issues, and student and teacher relationships, among other issues. This paper is a result of a multi-year, ongoing research-practitioner partnership focused on continuous program improvement and reflection. In the paper, we draw upon learning from the first five years to conceptualize a multi-level, iterative change model that highlights navigating tensions and challenges such as power, racial injustice, and authentic youth voice within a school district. We reflect on the learning to date and explore the implications for engaging youth participatory research practices within school districts. These critical reflections include the: 1) importance of engaging the most impacted youth, 2) need to prepare stakeholders for research, 3) critical nature of centering race and racial injustice within youth participatory research, 4) requirement of adapting to the realities of students' lives, school priorities and time; 5) attention focused on the role of adults as advisors within youth participatory research efforts; and the 6) need for adult stakeholders to listen to youth's findings. We close with practical lessons and future directions for youth participatory research to impact systemic change within large school districts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]