Search

ABSTRACT This paper examines the issue of parental engagement where children's services have brought court proceedings to protect children, from the perspective of specialist lawyers who represent parents. It draws on an in-depth, qualitative study of parents' representation conducted between 2008 and 2010. Parental non-co-operation with children's services is a common feature in these cases. Lawyers are partisans with duties to follow clients' instructions. They seek to build a trusting relationship and keep clients engaged in the process by giving advice, taking instructions and providing emotional support. Lawyers accept that parents have an absolute right to contest but use their power and authority to encourage their most vulnerable clients to concede. They are largely successful in keeping clients engaged in proceedings but parents rarely make the necessary changes in parenting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT This paper discusses findings from an evaluation of an advocacy scheme for parents whose children were subject to child protection proceedings including a pilot project where co-operation between parents and professionals was an issue. Encouraging findings of parents' experiences of being heard, being able to listen, and, in some cases, to act on concerns about their children's welfare are outlined. Three case studies offer accounts of practices that are gendered and occur against a backdrop of ethnic disadvantage. The paper suggests that current debates about reform need to recognize the need to support parents to manage intimidating systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]