Search

Background Individuals with COPD have increased sensitivity to traffic-related air pollution (TRAP) such as diesel exhaust (DE), but little is known about the acute effects of TRAP on exercise responses in COPD. Research question Does pre-exercise exposure to TRAP (DE300, PM2.5=300 μg/m3) have greater adverse effects on exercise endurance, exertional dyspnea, and cardiorespiratory responses to exercise in participants with mild-to-moderate COPD compared to former smokers with normal spirometry and healthy controls? Study design and Methods In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study, 11 healthy never-smokers, 9 ex-smokers without COPD and 9 ex-smokers with COPD were separately exposed to filtered air (FA) and DE300 for 2 hours separated by a minimum of 4 weeks. Participants performed symptom limited constant load cycling tests within 2.5 hours of exposure with detailed cardiorespiratory and exertional symptom measurements. Results There was a significant negative effect of TRAP on exercise endurance time in healthy controls (DE300 vs. FA: 10.2±8.2 vs. 12.9±9.5 min, respectively; p=0.03), but not in ex-smokers without COPD (10.1±6.9 vs. 12.2±8.0 min; respectively, p=0.57) or ex-smokers with COPD (9.8±6.4 vs. 8.4±6.6 min, respectively, p=0.31). Furthermore, significant increases in inspiratory duty cycle and absolute end-expiratory and end-inspiratory lung volumes were observed, and dyspnea ratings were elevated at select submaximal measurement times only in healthy controls. Interpretation Contrary to our hypothesis, it was the healthy controls rather than the ex-smokers with and without COPD that were negatively impacted by TRAP during exercise.

Background In patients with a history suggestive of asthma, diagnosis is usually confirmed by spirometry with bronchodilator response (BDR) or confirmatory methacholine challenge testing (MCT). Research Question We examined the proportion of participants with negative BDR testing who had a positive MCT (and its predictors) result and characteristics of MCT, including effects of controller medication tapering and temporal variability (and predictors of MCT result change), and concordance between MCT and pulmonologist asthma diagnosis. Study Design and Methods Adults with self-reported physician-diagnosed asthma were recruited by random-digit dialing across Canada. Subjects performed spirometry with BDR testing and returned for MCT if testing was nondiagnostic for asthma. Subjects on controllers underwent medication tapering with serial MCTs over 3 to 6 weeks. Subjects with a negative MCT (the provocative concentration of methacholine that results in a 20% drop in FEV1 [PC20] > 8 mg/mL) off medications were examined by a pulmonologist and had serial MCTs after 6 and 12 months. Results Of 500 subjects (50.5 ± 16.6 years old, 68.0% female) with a negative BDR test for asthma, 215 (43.0%) had a positive MCT. Subjects with prebronchodilator airflow limitation were more likely to have a positive MCT (OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.17-3.04). MCT converted from negative to positive, with medication tapering in 18 of 94 (19.1%) participants, and spontaneously over time in 25 of 165 (15.2%) participants. Of 231 subjects with negative MCT, 28 (12.1%) subsequently received an asthma diagnosis from a pulmonologist. Interpretation In subjects with a self-reported physician diagnosis of asthma, absence of bronchodilator reversibility had a negative predictive value of only 57% to exclude asthma. A finding of spirometric airflow limitation significantly increased chances of asthma. MCT results varied with medication taper and over time, and pulmonologists were sometimes prepared to give a clinical diagnosis of asthma despite negative MCT. Correspondingly, in patients for whom a high clinical suspicion of asthma exists, repeat testing appears to be warranted.