Search

Background Lung cancer screening (LCS) is an important secondary prevention measure to reduce lung cancer mortality. The goal of this study was to assess state-level variations in LCS among the US elderly during the first 3 years since Medicare began its LCS reimbursement policy in 2015. Methods This ecological study examined the relations between LCS utilization density, defined as the number of low-dose CT (LDCT) or shared decision-making and counseling (SDMC) services per 1,000 Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries derived from the Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data: Physician and Other Supplier public use file, and state-level factors from several publicly available data sources. The study included Kruskal-Wallis tests and a cluster analysis. Results In 2017, the median utilization density per 1,000 Medicare FFS beneficiaries was 3.32 for LDCT and 0.46 for SDMC, which was 24 and 13 times the 2015 level, respectively. From 2015 to 2017, the total number of unique providers billed for LCS increased from 222 to 3,444 for LDCT imaging and from 20 to 523 for SDMC. Higher utilizations for both LDCT and SDMC services tended to concentrate in the northeastern and upper Midwest states than in the southwest states. The cluster of states with high utilization density did not include those states with the most lung cancer mortality and/or smoking prevalence. Conclusions A steady increase was noted in LCS utilization since Medicare began its reimbursement policy. The utilization and its growth varied across the United States and differed between LDCT imaging and SDMC, indicating large growth potentials for LCS and for states with high lung cancer mortality and smoking prevalence.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer screening (LCS) is an important secondary prevention measure to reduce lung cancer mortality. The goal of this study was to assess state-level variations in LCS among the US elderly during the first 3 years since Medicare began its LCS reimbursement policy in 2015. METHODS: This ecological study examined the relations between LCS utilization density, defined as the number of low-dose CT (LDCT) or shared decision-making and counseling (SDMC) services per 1,000 Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries derived from the Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data: Physician and Other Supplier public use file, and state-level factors from several publicly available data sources. The study included Kruskal-Wallis tests and a cluster analysis. RESULTS: In 2017, the median utilization density per 1,000 Medicare FFS beneficiaries was 3.32 for LDCT and 0.46 for SDMC, which was 24 and 13 times the 2015 level, respectively. From 2015 to 2017, the total number of unique providers billed for LCS increased from 222 to 3,444 for LDCT imaging and from 20 to 523 for SDMC. Higher utilizations for both LDCT and SDMC services tended to concentrate in the northeastern and upper Midwest states than in the southwest states. The cluster of states with high utilization density did not include those states with the most lung cancer mortality and/or smoking prevalence. CONCLUSIONS: A steady increase was noted in LCS utilization since Medicare began its reimbursement policy. The utilization and its growth varied across the United States and differed between LDCT imaging and SDMC, indicating large growth potentials for LCS and for states with high lung cancer mortality and smoking prevalence.

Background Some interstitial lung diseases are associated with lung cancer. However, it is unclear whether asymptomatic interstitial lung abnormalities convey an independent risk. Objectives The goal of this study was to assess whether interstitial lung abnormalities are associated with an increased risk of lung cancer. Methods Data from all participants in the National Lung Cancer Trial were analyzed, except for subjects with preexisting interstitial lung disease or prevalent lung cancers. The primary analysis included those who underwent low-dose CT imaging; those undergoing chest radiography were included in a confirmatory analysis. Participants with evidence of reticular/reticulonodular opacities, honeycombing, fibrosis, or scarring were classified as having interstitial lung abnormalities. Lung cancer incidence and mortality in participants with and without interstitial lung abnormalities were compared by using Poisson and Cox regression, respectively. Results Of the 25,041 participants undergoing low-dose CT imaging included in the primary analysis, 20.2% had interstitial lung abnormalities. Participants with interstitial lung abnormalities had a higher incidence of lung cancer (incidence rate ratio, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.30-1.99). Interstitial lung abnormalities were associated with higher lung cancer incidence on adjusted analyses (incidence rate ratio, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.07-1.65). Lung cancer-specific mortality was also greater in participants with interstitial lung abnormalities. Similar findings were obtained in the analysis of participants undergoing chest radiography. Conclusions Asymptomatic interstitial lung abnormalities are an independent risk factor for lung cancer that can be incorporated into risk score models.

Our objective was to assess the usefulness of emphysema scores in predicting death from COPD and lung cancer.Emphysema was assessed with low-dose CT scans performed on 9,047 men and women for whom age and smoking history were documented. Each scan was scored according to the presence of emphysema as follows: none, mild, moderate, or marked. Follow-up time was calculated from time of CT scan to time of death or December 31, 2007, whichever came first. Cox regression analysis was used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) of emphysema as a predictor of death.Median age was 65 years, 4,433 (49%) were men, and 4,133 (46%) were currently smoking or had quit within 5 years. Emphysema was identified in 2,637 (29%) and was a significant predictor of death from COPD (HR, 9.3; 95% CI, 4.3-20.2; P.0001) and from lung cancer (HR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.5; P = .013), even when adjusted for age and smoking history.Visual assessment of emphysema on CT scan is a significant predictor of death from COPD and lung cancer.

Background Although CT screening for lung cancer results in a diagnosis of stage I > 80% of the time, benign noncalcified nodules are also found. We recognized that some nodules appeared to represent infectious bronchopneumonia or other inflammatory processes, as they resolved on follow-up CT, sometimes after antibiotic therapy. To determine the extent to which short-term CT radiographic follow-up might shorten the workup of nodules, we reviewed our experience with baseline and annual repeat CT screenings performed subsequent to the original Early Lung Cancer Action Project series. Methods The initial CT of 1,968 consecutive baseline and 2,343 annual repeat screenings performed from 1999 to 2002 was reviewed. We identified all those recommended for antibiotics on the initial CT who had a follow-up CT within 2 months and determined whether the nodule(s) resolved, decreased in size, remained unchanged, or grew. We then determined whether further follow-up resulted in a diagnosis of cancer. Results At baseline, among the 41 individuals who had follow-up CT within 2 months of the initial CT, 12 patients (29%) had complete or partial resolution; none of them subsequently received a diagnosis of lung cancer. On annual repeat screening, among the 39 individuals who had follow-up CT within 2 months of the initial CT, 29 patients (74%) had complete or partial resolution; none of them subsequently received a diagnosis of lung cancer. Among the 29 patients with nodules at baseline that were unchanged or grew, a total of 15 cancers were subsequently diagnosed; among the 10 patients on annual repeat scanning, there were 2 cancers. Conclusions In asymptomatic individuals undergoing CT screening for lung cancer, short-term follow-up CT within 2 months with or without antibiotics may circumvent the need for further evaluation in some individuals, particularly on annual repeat screening.

Study objectives Radiotherapy is considered to be the standard treatment for patients with stage I or II non-small lung cancer who refuse surgery or who are not surgical candidates because of significant comorbidities. To determine whether radiotherapy benefits these patients, we compared the survival of those treated with radiation alone to those left untreated. Methods Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry, we identified all patients in whom histologically confirmed, stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer had been diagnosed between 1988 and 2001. Among these patients, 4,357 did not undergo surgical resection. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared among patients who received and who did not receive radiation therapy. We used Cox regression analysis to evaluate the effect of radiation on survival after adjusting for potential confounders. Results The survival of patients with lung cancer who did not undergo resection and had been treated with radiation therapy was significantly better compared to the untreated patients (stage I cancer, p = 0.0001; stage II cancer, p = 0.001). The median survival time of patients with stage I disease who underwent radiotherapy was 21 months compared to 14 months for untreated patients. Stage II patients who received and did not receive radiation therapy had median survival times of 14 and 9 months, respectively. The survival of treated and untreated patients was not significantly different approximately 5 years after diagnosis (stage I disease, 15% vs 14%, respectively; stage II disease, 11% vs 10%, respectively). In multivariate analysis, radiation therapy was significantly associated with improved lung cancer survival after controlling for age, sex, race, and tumor histology. Conclusions These results suggest that radiotherapy is associated with improved survival in patients with unresected stage I or II non-small cell lung cancer. The observed improvement in median survival time was only 5 to 7 months, and radiotherapy did not offer the possibility of a cure.

Objective: To assess the relationship between tumor size and disease stage at the time of diagnosis in non-small cell lung cancer. Methods: From the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registry, we identified all cases of primary non-small cell lung cancer diagnosed prior to autopsy. Among these, we focused on 84,152 cases diagnosed in 1988 or later and documented as to tumor size and disease stage at diagnosis. The distribution of disease stage within categories of tumor size was determined. Results: The smaller the tumor was, the more likely the disease was stage I. For tumors 45 mm, with all of these proportions being very precise. Conclusions: Tumor size has substantial bearing on disease stage in non-small cell lung cancer. (CHEST 2005; 127:1136–1139)

The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between tumor size and curability of stage I non-small cell lung cancer.From the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry 2003, we identified all primary non-small cell lung cancer cases that were diagnosed prior to autopsy. Among these cases, we narrowed the focus to those diagnosed in 1988 or later, and to 7,620 patients who had undergone curative surgical resection. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were obtained for these stage I malignancies for five tumor size categories (ie, 5 to 15 mm, 16 to 25 mm, 26 to 35 mm, 36 to 45 mm, and45 mm). The 12-year Kaplan-Meier estimator of survival was used as a measure of lung cancer cure rate.Among 7,620 stage I cancers, cure rates decreased with increasing tumor size. The 12-year survival rates for patients with tumors 5 to 15 mm in diameter was 69% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64 to 74%), 63% for those with tumors 16 to 25 mm in diameter (95% CI, 60 to 67%), 58% for those with tumors 26 to 35 mm in diameter (95% CI, 54 to 61%), 53% for those with tumors 36 to 45 mm in diameter (95% CI, 48 to 57%), and 43% for those with tumors45 mm in diameter (95% CI, 39 to 48%). Cure rates were statistically significantly different for all tumor size categories (p0.05) except for the groups with tumors 26 to 35 mm and 36 to 45 mm in diameter (p = 0.10).Smaller tumor size at diagnosis is associated with improved curability within stage I non-small cell lung cancers. These results suggest that further subclassification by size within stage I may be important.

Objectives To review the Early Lung Cancer Action Project experience and the medical literature from 1993 to 2003 on detection of the small, noncalcified pulmonary nodule by CT in order to formulate a management algorithm for these nodules. Design Prospective noncomparative study of smokers without prior malignancy and a review of the medical literature of CT screening of lung cancer. Interventions Chest CT and, where appropriate, CT observation for nodule growth, antibiotics, CT-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy, fiberoptic bronchoscopy, and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Results The following factors influence the probability of malignancy in a CT-detected, small, noncalcified pulmonary nodule: size, change in size, age, smoking history, density, number of nodules, gender, circumstance of the CT, spirometry, occupational history, and endemic granulomatous disease. The two diagnostic techniques most useful in evaluating the CT-detected, small, noncalcified nodule are short-term observation of nodule growth by CT and CT-guided FNA. Due to small nodule size and the frequent finding of nonsolid or part-solid nodules, positron emission tomography, fiberoptic bronchoscopy, and VATS were less useful. Conclusions Pulmonologists are frequently asked to evaluate the CT-detected, small, noncalcified nodule invisible on standard chest radiography. Immediate biopsy is justified if the likelihood of cancer is high, but if that likelihood is low or intermediate, a period of observation by CT is appropriate. VATS or thoracotomy are rarely necessary for a diagnosis of lung cancer in the CT-detected small pulmonary nodule.

Study objective While the “gold standard” for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism remains selective pulmonary angiography and its sensitivity and specificity are very high, it is not frequently used. The Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED) clinical trial results confirmed the low mortality and morbidity of pulmonary angiogram and the need for further evaluation of patients with “low” and “intermediate” probability ventilation/perfusion scans. We wanted to determine whether physician behavior changed from 1988 to 1991. Design Retrospective review of inpatients having a ventilation/perfusion scan for suspected pulmonary embolism. The official reading of the ventilation/perfusion scans, venous leg sonograms with Doppler, contrast leg venograms, and pulmonary angiograms were recorded as well as the final diagnosis and treatment. Setting A large city hospital—The New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center, New York. Patients All inpatients who had a ventilation perfusion scan in 1988 and all inpatients who had the procedure in 1991. Intervention None. Results The percentages of patients in each ventilation/perfusion scan category were similar in 1988 and 1991 as was the percentage of those who underwent anticoagulation therapy. Significantly more sonograms, however, were performed in 1991 along with fewer angiograms and venograms without any significant change in the overall cost. Conclusions In 1991, additional diagnostic tests were performed after a low or intermediate ventilation/perfusion scan, but the percentage of patients who underwent anticoagulation did not change from 1988. This suggests that better diagnostic screening approaches with more explicit guidelines need to be developed that take into account the local disease prevalance and hospital diagnostic and practice patterns.

Although CT screening for lung cancer results in a diagnosis of stage I80% of the time, benign noncalcified nodules are also found. We recognized that some nodules appeared to represent infectious bronchopneumonia or other inflammatory processes, as they resolved on follow-up CT, sometimes after antibiotic therapy. To determine the extent to which short-term CT radiographic follow-up might shorten the workup of nodules, we reviewed our experience with baseline and annual repeat CT screenings performed subsequent to the original Early Lung Cancer Action Project series.The initial CT of 1,968 consecutive baseline and 2,343 annual repeat screenings performed from 1999 to 2002 was reviewed. We identified all those recommended for antibiotics on the initial CT who had a follow-up CT within 2 months and determined whether the nodule(s) resolved, decreased in size, remained unchanged, or grew. We then determined whether further follow-up resulted in a diagnosis of cancer.At baseline, among the 41 individuals who had follow-up CT within 2 months of the initial CT, 12 patients (29%) had complete or partial resolution; none of them subsequently received a diagnosis of lung cancer. On annual repeat screening, among the 39 individuals who had follow-up CT within 2 months of the initial CT, 29 patients (74%) had complete or partial resolution; none of them subsequently received a diagnosis of lung cancer. Among the 29 patients with nodules at baseline that were unchanged or grew, a total of 15 cancers were subsequently diagnosed; among the 10 patients on annual repeat scanning, there were 2 cancers.In asymptomatic individuals undergoing CT screening for lung cancer, short-term follow-up CT within 2 months with or without antibiotics may circumvent the need for further evaluation in some individuals, particularly on annual repeat screening.

To assess the relationship between tumor size and disease stage at the time of diagnosis in non-small cell lung cancer.From the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registry, we identified all cases of primary non-small cell lung cancer diagnosed prior to autopsy. Among these, we focused on 84,152 cases diagnosed in 1988 or later and documented as to tumor size and disease stage at diagnosis. The distribution of disease stage within categories of tumor size was determined.The smaller the tumor was, the more likely the disease was stage I. For tumors15 mm in diameter, the proportion of stage I was 54%, compared with 46% for 16 to 25 mm, 34% for 26 to 35 mm, 25% for 36 to 45 mm, and 15% for cases45 mm, with all of these proportions being very precise.Tumor size has substantial bearing on disease stage in non-small cell lung cancer.

Bronchioloalveolar cell carcinoma is known to have several presentations. We present a case of a patient with a solitary nodule in the upper lobe who had an episode of hemoptysis one week prior to lobectomy. Blood clots were removed from the lower lobe bronchus at surgery. Seven months later, the patient was documented to have recurrence in the lower lobe with computed tomographic scan and pathologic findings consistent with endobronchial spread of tumor.