Search

Several studies have demonstrated that air-bubbling and foam fractionation techniques can efficiently remove long-chain PFAS from contaminated water. However, removing short-chain PFAS is challenging due to its lower surface activity and inability to form self-assembly structures at the air-water interface. In this study, we tested various additives, including salts, surfactants, and polymers, to improve short-chain PFAS (e.g., perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS) and perfluorobutanoic acid (PFBA)) removal in non-foaming solutions using a bench-scale system. We found that in the presence of cetyltrimethylammonium chloride (CTAC) and salt, air-bubbling can significantly remove 0.5 μg L -1 of PFBS and PFBA in deionized water by >99% (15 min) and 81% (60 min), respectively. The decline of surface tension and the formation of thin foam-like layers during bubbling, controlled by the concentration of CTAC, significantly improved the removal of short-chain PFAS. Adding anionic and neutral surfactants showed no removal of short-chain PFAS during bubbling, suggesting the importance of the electrostatic interactions between short-chain PFAS and the cationic CTAC. We observed a 1:1 M ratio between CTAC and PFBS removed from the solution, suggesting the formation of ion pairs in the solution and enhancing the surface activity of the overall neutral (PFAS-CTAC) complex. A mass balance of the system revealed that the primary mechanism by which PFAS was removed from non-foaming waters was through aerosol generation (70-100%). Using the optimized condition, PFAS mixtures (short- and long-chain PFAS, including five recently regulated PFAS by USPEA, 2 nM each) in deionized water and natural groundwater were successfully removed to below detection (>99% removal; <2 ng L -1 ), except for PFBA (25-73% removal). These results provide an improved understanding of the mechanism by which PFAS is removed during foam fractionation and highlight the need for capturing aerosols enriched with PFAS to prevent secondary contamination., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

1,4-Dioxane is a recalcitrant pollutant in water and is ineffectively removed during conventional water and wastewater treatment processes. In this study, we demonstrate the application of nitrifying sand filters to remove 1,4-dioxane from domestic wastewater without the need for bioaugmentation or biostimulation. The sand columns were able to remove 61 ± 10% of 1,4-dioxane on average (initial concentration: 50 μg/L) from wastewater, outperforming conventional wastewater treatment approaches. Microbial analysis revealed the presence of 1,4-dioxane degrading functional genes (dxmB, phe, mmox, and prmA) to support biodegradation being the dominant degradation pathway. Adding antibiotics (sulfamethoxazole and ciprofloxacin), that temporarily inhibited the nitrification process during the dosing period, showed a minor effect in 1,4-dioxane removal (6-8% decline, p < 0.05), suggesting solid resilience of the 1,4-dioxane-degrading microbial community in the columns. Columns amended with sodium azide significantly (p < 0.05) depressed 1,4-dioxane removal in the early stage of dosing but followed by a gradual increase of the removal over time to >80%, presumably due to a shift in the microbial community toward azide-resistant 1,4-dioxane degrading microbes (e.g., fungi). This study demonstrated for the first time the resilience of the 1,4-dioxane-degrading microorganisms during antibiotic shocks, and the selective enrichment of efficient 1,4-dioxane-degrading microbes after azide poisoning. Our observation could provide insights into designing better 1,4-dioxane remediation strategies in the future., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)