Search

Endocrine disrupting chemicals interfere with the endocrine system in animals, including humans, to exert adverse effects. One of the mechanisms of endocrine disruption is through the binding of receptors such as the estrogen receptor (ER) in target cells. The concentration of any chemical in serum is important for its entry into the target cells to bind the receptors. α-Fetoprotein (AFP) is a major transport protein in rodent serum that can bind with estrogens and thus change a chemical's availability for entrance into the target cell. Sequestration of an estrogen in the serum can alter the chemical's potential for disrupting estrogen receptor-mediated responses. To better understand endocrine disruption, we developed a competitive binding assay using rat amniotic fluid, which contains very high levels of AFP, and measured the binding to the rat AFP for 125 structurally diverse chemicals, most of which are known to bind ER. Fifty-three chemicals were able to bind the rat AFP in the assay, while 72 chemicals were determined to be nonbinders. Observations from closely examining the relationship between the binding data and structures of the tested chemicals are rationally explained in a manner consistent with proposed binding regions of rat AFP in the literature. The data reported here represent the largest data set of structurally diverse chemicals tested for rat AFP binding. The data assist in elucidating binding interactions and mechanisms between chemicals and rat AFP and, in turn, assist in the evaluation of the endocrine disrupting potential of chemicals.

A number of environmental and industrial chemicals are reported to possess androgenic or antiandrogenic activities. These androgenic endocrine disrupting chemicals may disrupt the endocrine system of humans and wildlife by mimicking or antagonizing the functions of natural hormones. The present study developed a low cost recombinant androgen receptor (AR) competitive binding assay that uses no animals. We validated the assay by comparing the protocols and results from other similar assays, such as the binding assay using prostate cytosol. We tested 202 natural, synthetic, and environmental chemicals that encompass a broad range of structural classes, including steroids, diethylstilbestrol and related chemicals, antiestrogens, flutamide derivatives, bisphenol A derivatives, alkylphenols, parabens, alkyloxyphenols, phthalates, siloxanes, phytoestrogens, DDTs, PCBs, pesticides, organophosphate insecticides, and other chemicals. Some of these chemicals are environmentally persistent and/or commercially important, but their AR binding affinities have not been previously reported. To the best of our knowledge, these results represent the largest and most diverse data set publicly available for chemical binding to the AR. Through a careful structure-activity relationship (SAR) examination of the data set in conjunction with knowledge of the recently reported ligand-AR crystal structures, we are able to define the general structural requirements for chemical binding to AR. Hydrophobic interactions are important for AR binding. The interaction between ligand and AR at the 3- and 17-positions of testosterone and R1881 found in other chemical classes are discussed in depth. The SAR studies of ligand binding characteristics for AR are compared to our previously reported results for estrogen receptor binding.

Understanding structural requirements for a chemical to exhibit estrogen receptor (ER) binding has been important in various fields. This knowledge has been directly and indirectly applied to design drugs for human estrogen replacement therapy, and to identify estrogenic endocrine disruptors. This paper reports structure-activity relationships (SARs) based on a total of 230 chemicals, including both natural and xenoestrogens. Activities were generated using a validated ER competitive binding assay, which covers a 10(6)-fold range. This study is focused on identification of structural commonalities among diverse ER ligands. It provides an overall picture of how xenoestrogens structurally resemble endogenous 17beta-estradiol (E(2)) and the synthetic estrogen diethylstilbestrol (DES). On the basis of SAR analysis, five distinguishing criteria were found to be essential for xenoestrogen activity, using E(2) as a template: (1) H-bonding ability of the phenolic ring mimicking the 3-OH, (2) H-bond donor mimicking the17beta-OH and O-O distance between 3- and 17beta-OH, (3) precise steric hydrophobic centers mimicking steric 7alpha- and 11beta-substituents, (4) hydrophobicity, and (5) a ring structure. The 3-position H-bonding ability of phenols is a significant requirement for ER binding. This contributes as both a H-bond donor and acceptor, although predominantly as a donor. However, the 17beta-OH contributes as a H-bond donor only. The precise space (the size and orientation) of steric hydrophobic bulk groups is as important as a 17beta-OH. Where a direct comparison can be made, strong estrogens tend to be more hydrophobic. A rigid ring structure favors ER binding. The knowledge derived from this study is rationalized into a set of hierarchical rules that will be useful in guidance for identification of potential estrogens.