Search

Abstract: This work presents a comprehensive study of different turbulence models, including the k–ε, SST, SSG–RSM and the SAS–SST models, for simulating turbulent flow in a baffled tank stirred with a Rushton turbine. All the turbulence models tested predict the mean axial and tangential velocities reasonably well, but under-predict the decay of mean radial velocity away from the impeller. The k–ε model predicts poorly the generation and dissipation of turbulence in the vicinity of the impeller. This contrasts with the SST model, which properly predicts the appearance of maxima in the turbulence kinetic energy and turbulence energy dissipation rate just off the impeller blades. Curvature correction improves the SST model by allowing a more accurate prediction of the magnitude and location of these maxima. However, neither the k–ε nor the SST model is able to properly capture the chaotic and three-dimensional nature of the trailing vortices that form downstream of the blades of the impeller. In this sense, the SAS–SST model produces more physical predictions. However, this model has some drawbacks for modelling stirred tanks, such as the large number of modelled revolutions required to obtain good statistical averaging for calculating turbulence quantities. Taking into consideration both accuracy and solution time, the SSG–RSM model is the least satisfactory model tested for predicting turbulent flow in a baffled stirred tank with a Rushton turbine. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: An experimental study and numerical investigation of thermal mixing are carried out on tandem twin jets in cross flow. Experiments were carried out for velocity ratios 1, 2 and 4 for 15°C temperature difference between main pipe and jet fluid. Velocity and temperature fields are measured using Hot Film Anemometer (HFA). Three dimensional steady state Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations have been carried out to predict the velocity and temperature fields. The predicted velocity and temperature fields are in good agreement with the experimental measurements. Temperature fluctuations have been predicted using temperature variance model. The effect of jet spacing for different velocity ratios is studied. For jet spacing equal to twice the jet diameter, both the jets influence each other. Increase in the jet spacing decreases the effect of jets on each other. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Three-compartment model was used to study non-homogeneity of mixing in a fully baffled stirred tank. Multiple reference frame (MRF) technique was used for calculations. Calculations were performed to study the effects of agitator speed, impeller diameter, baffle width and distance of impeller from bottom of the tank on turbulent flow field. Three different zones of the vessel, that were a small zone near the impeller, another zone around the baffles, and a relatively large zone far from the impeller and baffles, named circulation zone, were investigated. Boundaries of these zones were determined using two different methods. The first method used gradient of energy dissipation rate while the other method used cumulative energy dissipation rate to determine the zone boundaries. Zone boundaries determined by both methods were comparable. The turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate gradient was the preferred method due to its simplicity. Turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate increased with agitator speed in all zones. Both turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate and turbulent kinetic energy showed considerable change with impeller diameter at impeller zone, while no remarkable change was observed at baffle and circulation zones. Three-compartment model parameters, impeller and baffle energy dissipation ratios λ i, λ b, impeller and baffle volume ratios μ i, μ b and impeller and baffle exchange flow rates Q i, Q b were obtained from CFD simulations. Impeller energy dissipation ratio, impeller exchange flow rate and baffle exchange flow rate increased while baffle volume ratio decreased with agitation rate and impeller diameter. Baffle energy dissipation ratio and impeller volume ratio showed no considerable change with agitation rate and impeller diameter. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]