Search

[Display omitted] • Electrochemical techniques for uranium extraction from water were reviewed. • The strengths, limitations, applicability of each method were evaluated. • The fouling of membranes and electrodes is a main challenge. • Environmental and economic considerations are discussed. Electrochemical removal of uranium from water is an emerging topic that addresses the treatment of drinking water, remediation of contaminated sites, and mining from seawater. Electrochemical strategies compare favorably to conventional processes, such as adsorption and coagulation/flocculation, with advantages in speed and efficiency, materials regeneration, uranium recovery, and recycling. This review assesses all published work on electrochemical techniques for uranium extraction from water, including capacitive deionization (electrosorption), electrodeposition, electrodialysis, and electrocoagulation. This work compares these approaches with conventional techniques and discusses their applicability in different use cases. Environmental and economic considerations are discussed, as well as the current outlook and opportunities for engagement in this emerging field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] • The preparation process of the CDI electrode is simplified. • Laser-induced graphene (LIG) can be directly used as a CDI electrode. • LIG electrode is modified by one-step electrodeposition of Co 4 S 3. • The LIG6/Co 4 S 3 -15 presents a high adsorption capacity of 2702.79 mg g−1. • UO 2 2+ adsorption is attributed to the synergistic action of EDLs and pseudocapacitance. It has been proved that capacitive deionization (CDI) technology possesses a significant potential for uranium capture. However, the CDI performance has been limited by the complex preparation process of the electrodes and the poor adhesion between electrode materials and collectors. Here we combine the laser-induced graphene (LIG) and the electrodeposition to develop the LIG/cobalt sulfide (LIG/Co 4 S 3) electrodes with good adsorption performance. The obtained LIG6/Co 4 S 3 -15 electrode has both electrical double layers (EDLs) and pseudocapacitance properties, with a specific capacitance of 24.27 F g−1, which is 1.82 times higher than that of LIG6 (13.36 F g−1). The LIG6/Co 4 S 3 -15 electrode exhibited a high adsorption capacity of 2702.79 mg g−1. The advantages of this electrode preparation method are mainly attributed to the synergistic effect of the following aspects: (i) simplified graphene preparation by avoiding wet chemistry and post-treatment steps; (ii) simplified tedious electrode preparation such as electrode slurry distribution and sheet coating; (iii) the three-dimensional structure of LIG provides not only the conductive network but also the site for Co 4 S 3 nanosheet growth, thus avoiding nanosheet aggregation. The abundant pore structure of the conductive graphene substrate and the layered structure of the Co 4 S 3 nanosheets enable the LIG6/Co 4 S 3 -15 electrode with fast charge/ion transport, high hydrophilicity and superior pseudocapacitance, allowing uranyl (UO 2 2+) to be firstly electrosorbed, then physicochemically adsorbed, and finally electrocatalytically reduced/deposited onto the electrode. This study will offer a simple and environmentally friendly method for the synthesis of electrodes and provide a reference for the design of efficient electroadsorption materials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]