Search

The degradation of most intracellular proteins is a dynamic and tightly regulated process performed by proteasomes. To date, different forms of proteasomes have been identified. Currently the role of non-constitutive proteasomes (immunoproteasomes (iPs) and intermediate proteasomes (intPs)) has attracted special attention. Here, using a CRISPR-Cas9 nickase technology, four cell lines: histiocytic lymphoma, colorectal adenocarcinoma, cervix adenocarcinoma, and hepatocarcinoma were modified to express proteasomes with mCherry-tagged β5i subunit, which is a catalytic subunit of iPs and intPs. Importantly, the expression of the chimeric gene in modified cells is under the control of endogenous regulatory mechanisms and is increased following IFN-γ and/or TNF-α stimulation. Fluorescent proteasomes retain catalytic activity and are distributed within the nucleus and cytoplasm. RNAseq reveals marginal differences in gene expression profiles between the modified and wild-type cell lines. Predominant metabolic pathways and patterns of expressed receptors were identified for each cell line. Using established cell lines, we demonstrated that anti-cancer drugs Ruxolitinib, Vincristine and Gefitinib stimulated the expression of β5i-containing proteasomes, which might affect disease prognosis. Taken together, obtained cell lines can be used as a platform for real-time studies of immunoproteasome gene expression, localization of iPs and intPs, interaction of non-constitutive proteasomes with other proteins, proteasome trafficking and many other aspects of proteasome biology in living cells. Moreover, the established platform might be especially useful for fast and large-scale experiments intended to evaluate the effects of different conditions including treatment with various drugs and compounds on the proteasome pool.

Proteasomes are intracellular structures responsible for protein degradation. The 20S proteasome is a core catalytic element of the proteasome assembly. Variations of catalytic subunits generate different forms of 20S proteasomes including immunoproteasomes (iPs), which are present mostly in the immune cells. Certain cells of the immune system are primary targets of retroviruses. It has been shown that several viral proteins directly affect proteasome functionality, while inhibition of proteasome activity with broad specificity proteasome inhibitors stimulates viral transduction. Here we specifically addressed the role of the immunoproteasomes during early stages of viral transduction and investigated the effects of specific immunoproteasome inhibition and activation prior to infection using a panel of cell lines. Inhibition of iPs in hematopoietic cells with immunoproteasome-specific inhibitor ONX-0914 resulted in increased infection by VSV-G pseudotyped lentiviruses. Moreover, a tendency for increased infection of cloned cells with endogenously decreased proteasome activity was revealed. Conversely, activation of iPs by IFN-γ markedly reduced the viral infectivity, which was rescued upon simultaneous immunoproteasome inhibition. Our results indicate that immunoproteasome activity might be determinative for the cellular antiretroviral resistance at least for the cells with high iP content. Finally, therapeutic application of immunoproteasome inhibitors might promote retroviral infection of cells in vivo.