Search

Summary: Three types of structurally related structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) complexes, referred to as condensins, have been identified in bacteria. Smc-ScpAB is present in most bacteria, whereas MukBEF is found in enterobacteria and MksBEF is scattered over the phylogenic tree. The contributions of these condensins to chromosome management were characterized in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which carries both Smc-ScpAB and MksBEF. In this bacterium, SMC-ScpAB controls chromosome disposition by juxtaposing chromosome arms. In contrast, MksBEF is critical for chromosome segregation in the absence of the main segregation system, and it affects the higher-order architecture of the chromosome by promoting DNA contacts in the megabase range. Strikingly, our results reveal a prevalence of Smc-ScpAB over MksBEF involving a coordination of their activities with chromosome replication. They also show that E. coli MukBEF can substitute for MksBEF in P. aeruginosa while prevailing over Smc-ScpAB. Our results reveal a hierarchy between activities of bacterial condensins on the same chromosome.

The structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) complex plays an important role in chromosome organization and segregation in most living organisms. In Caulobacter crescentus, SMC is required to align the left and the right arms of the chromosome that run in parallel down the long axis of the cell. However, the mechanism of SMC-mediated alignment of chromosomal arms remains elusive. Here, using genome-wide methods and microscopy of single cells, we show that Caulobacter SMC is recruited to the centromeric parS site and that SMC-mediated arm alignment depends on the chromosome-partitioning protein ParB. We provide evidence that SMC likely tethers the parS-proximal regions of the chromosomal arms together, promoting arm alignment. Furthermore, we show that highly transcribed genes near parS that are oriented against SMC translocation disrupt arm alignment, suggesting that head-on transcription interferes with SMC translocation. Our results demonstrate a tight interdependence of bacterial chromosome organization and global patterns of transcription.

Summary Condensins load onto DNA to organize chromosomes. Smc-ScpAB clearly loads onto the parS sites bound by Spo0J, but other loading site(s) must operate independently of parS . In this study, we asked where and how Smc-ScpAB normally selects its loading site. Our results suggest that rDNA is also a loading site. A pull-down assay revealed that Smc-ScpAB preferentially loads onto rDNA in the wild-type cell and even in a Δ spo0J mutant but not in a Δ smc mutant. Moreover, we showed that deletion mutants of rDNAs cause a defect in nucleoid separation, and at least two rDNAs near oriC are essential for separation. Full-length rDNA, including promoters, is required for loading and nucleoid separation. A synthetic defect by deletions of both rDNA and spo0J resulted in more aberrant nucleoid separation. We propose that a single-stranded segment of DNA that is exposed at highly transcribed rRNA operons would become a target for Smc-ScpAB loading. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary The structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) complex plays an important role in chromosome organization and segregation in most living organisms. In Caulobacter crescentus , SMC is required to align the left and the right arms of the chromosome that run in parallel down the long axis of the cell. However, the mechanism of SMC-mediated alignment of chromosomal arms remains elusive. Here, using genome-wide methods and microscopy of single cells, we show that Caulobacter SMC is recruited to the centromeric parS site and that SMC-mediated arm alignment depends on the chromosome-partitioning protein ParB. We provide evidence that SMC likely tethers the parS- proximal regions of the chromosomal arms together, promoting arm alignment. Furthermore, we show that highly transcribed genes near parS that are oriented against SMC translocation disrupt arm alignment, suggesting that head-on transcription interferes with SMC translocation. Our results demonstrate a tight interdependence of bacterial chromosome organization and global patterns of transcription. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ring-shaped structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) complexes like condensin and cohesin extrude loops of DNA. It remains, however, unclear how they can extrude DNA loops in chromatin that is bound with proteins. Here, we use in vitro single-molecule visualization to show that nucleosomes, RNA polymerase, and dCas9 pose virtually no barrier to loop extrusion by yeast condensin. We find that even DNA-bound nanoparticles as large as 200 nm, much bigger than the SMC ring size, also translocate into DNA loops during extrusion by condensin and cohesin. This even occurs for a single-chain version of cohesin in which the ring-forming subunits are covalently linked and cannot open to entrap DNA. The data show that SMC-driven loop extrusion has surprisingly little difficulty in accommodating large roadblocks into the loop. The findings also show that the extruded DNA does not pass through the SMC ring (pseudo)topologically, hence pointing to a nontopological mechanism for DNA loop extrusion. [Display omitted] • Nucleosomes, RNA polymerase, and dCas9 pose no barrier to DNA loop extruding condensin • Loop extruding condensin and cohesin can bypass 200-nm nanoparticles • Cohesin with a covalently closed SMC-kleisin ring can pass 200-nm particles into loops • The roadblock traversals point to a nontopological mechanism of DNA loop extrusion If and how SMC proteins perform DNA loop extrusion on protein-decorated DNA is an ongoing debate. Pradhan et al. show that DNA-binding proteins do not pose barriers to DNA-loop-extruding SMC complexes. Roadblocks larger than the SMC ring size cannot inhibit loop extrusion, which points to a non-topological loop extrusion mechanism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chromosomes readily unlink and segregate to daughter cells during cell division, highlighting a remarkable ability of cells to organize long DNA molecules. SMC complexes promote DNA organization by loop extrusion. In most bacteria, chromosome folding initiates at dedicated start sites marked by the ParB/ parS partition complexes. Whether SMC complexes recognize a specific DNA structure in the partition complex or a protein component is unclear. By replacing genes in Bacillus subtilis with orthologous sequences from Streptococcus pneumoniae , we show that the three subunits of the bacterial Smc complex together with the ParB protein form a functional module that can organize and segregate foreign chromosomes. Using chimeric proteins and chemical cross-linking, we find that ParB directly binds the Smc subunit. We map an interface to the Smc joint and the ParB CTP-binding domain. Structure prediction indicates how the ParB clamp presents DNA to the Smc complex, presumably to initiate DNA loop extrusion. [Display omitted] • The bacterial DNA-binding protein ParB interacts with the condensin-like Smc-ScpAB • Genetic mapping and structure predictions reveal an Smc joint-ParB binding interface • Mutating the binding interface hampers Smc recruitment but not other ParB functions • ParB and Smc-ScpAB form a transplantable unit for chromosome segregation in bacteria By transplanting Streptococcus genes into Bacillus subtilis , Bock et al. demonstrate that a four-gene module comprising genes encoding ParB and the condensin-like subunits Smc, ScpA, and ScpB can promote chromosome segregation in foreign bacteria. They elucidate a ParB-Smc protein-protein interface and show it is required for Smc recruitment by ParB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multi-subunit SMC ATPases control chromosome superstructure apparently by catalyzing a DNA-loop-extrusion reaction. SMC proteins harbor an ABC-type ATPase "head" and a "hinge" dimerization domain connected by a coiled coil "arm." Two arms in a SMC dimer can co-align, thereby forming a rod-shaped particle. Upon ATP binding, SMC heads engage, and arms are thought to separate. Here, we study the shape of Bacillus subtilis Smc-ScpAB by electron-spin resonance spectroscopy. Arm separation is readily detected proximal to the heads in the absence of ligands, and separation near the hinge largely depends on ATP and DNA. Artificial blockage of arm opening eliminates DNA stimulation of ATP hydrolysis but does not prevent basal ATPase activity. We report an arm contact as being important for controlling the transformations. Point mutations at this arm interface eliminated Smc function. We propose that partially open, intermediary conformations provide directionality to SMC DNA translocation by (un)binding suitable DNA substrates. [Display omitted] • Smc arms partially open in absence of ATP and DNA • ATP and DNA binding are essential for full opening of the arms • Single-residue substitutions in the arm are lethal, likely by altering Smc dynamics • Intermediary states may provide directionality to the Smc DNA translocation Using electron-spin resonance spectroscopy and cysteine crosslinking, Vazquez Nunez et al. reveal intermediary conformations of the bacterial Smc complex. Smc arms partially open in the absence of ligands, and Smc heads adopt an ATP-pre-engaged state. Gradual opening of the Smc arms may direct DNA substrate binding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The ring-shaped cohesin complex topologically binds to DNA to establish sister chromatid cohesion. This topological binding creates a structural obstacle to genome-wide chromosomal events, such as replication. Here, we examine how conformational changes in cohesin circumvent being an obstacle in human cells. We show that ATP hydrolysis-driven head disengagement, leading to the structural maintenance of chromosome (SMC) ring opening, is essential for the progression of DNA replication. Closure of the SMC ring stalls replication in a checkpoint-independent manner. The SMC ring opening also facilitates sister chromatid resolution and chromosome segregation in mitosis. Single-molecule analyses reveal that forced closure of the SMC ring suppresses the translocation of cohesin on DNA as well as the formation of stable DNA loops. Our results suggest that the ATP hydrolysis-driven SMC ring opening makes topologically bound cohesin dynamic on DNA to achieve replication-dependent cohesion in the S phase and to resolve cohesion in mitosis. Thus, the SMC ring opening could be a fundamental mechanism to modulate both cohesion and higher-order genome structure. [Display omitted] • ATP hydrolysis-driven SMC ring opening is essential for DNA replication • SMC ring opening is required for sister chromatid resolution and chromosome segregation • Closure of the SMC ring hinders translocation of cohesin on DNA and DNA loop extrusion ATP hydrolysis drives the opening of cohesin's SMC ring, leading drastic changes in cohesin structure. In living cells and in vitro single-molecule analyses, Sakata et al. reveal that the ATPase-driven SMC ring opening of cohesin has crucial roles during DNA replication, during mitotic chromosome segregation, and in DNA loop extrusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Three types of structurally related structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) complexes, referred to as condensins, have been identified in bacteria. Smc-ScpAB is present in most bacteria, whereas MukBEF is found in enterobacteria and MksBEF is scattered over the phylogenic tree. The contributions of these condensins to chromosome management were characterized in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which carries both Smc-ScpAB and MksBEF. In this bacterium, SMC-ScpAB controls chromosome disposition by juxtaposing chromosome arms. In contrast, MksBEF is critical for chromosome segregation in the absence of the main segregation system, and it affects the higher-order architecture of the chromosome by promoting DNA contacts in the megabase range. Strikingly, our results reveal a prevalence of Smc-ScpAB over MksBEF involving a coordination of their activities with chromosome replication. They also show that E. coli MukBEF can substitute for MksBEF in P. aeruginosa while prevailing over Smc-ScpAB. Our results reveal a hierarchy between activities of bacterial condensins on the same chromosome., Competing Interests: Declaration of Interests The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)