Search

In response to hydroxyurea treatment or DNA damage the total rate of DNA replication per cell is reduced. This reduction may be due to physical hindrance of the replication forks or to active, checkpoint-dependent processes. Here we review current knowledge about how and to what extent the intra-S checkpoint affects DNA replication. We discuss evidence that some checkpoint proteins are active even in a normal S phase and we suggest a model that resolves the apparent contradiction between different views on checkpoint-dependent slowing of the rate of DNA replication: does the intra-S checkpoint repress or delay the initiation of all origins or late replication origins only, and to what extent does it inhibit fork progression. Finally, the new model is discussed in the context of cancer development.

During the S phase of the cell cycle, the entire genome is replicated. There is a high level of orderliness to this process through the temporally and topologically coordinated activation of many replication origins situated along chromosomes. We investigated the program of replication from origins initiating in early S phase by labeling synchronized normal human fibroblasts (NHF1) with nucleotide analogs for various pulse times and measuring labeled tracks in combed DNA fibers. Our analysis showed that replication forks progress 9-35 kilobases from newly initiated origins, followed by a pause in synthesis before replication resumes. Pausing was not observed near origins that initiated in the middle of S phase. No evidence for pausing near origins was found at the beginning of the S phase in glioblastoma T98G cells. Treatment with the S phase checkpoint inhibitor caffeine abrogated pausing in NHF1 cells in early S phase. This suggests that pausing may comprise a novel aspect of the intra-S phase checkpoint pathway or a related new early S checkpoint. Further, it is possible that the loss of this regulatory process in cancer cells such as T98G could be a contributing factor in the genetic instability that typifies cancers.

No-more-than-once per cell cycle initiation of DNA replication is a golden rule to maintain genome stability and guarantee cell survival. In our recent work we discovered that small genome fragments of about 200 bp are repeatedly synthesised at human DNA replication origins at the time of origin firing during S phase in normal cells. Rereplicated DNA fragments coincide physical and temporarily with replication origin activity, implying that their generation is intimately associated with the initiation of DNA replication. This unexpected finding may provide a new framework to study replication origin regulation.

The regulation of DNA replication initiation is well documented, for both unperturbed and damaged cells. The regulation of elongation, or fork velocity, however, has only recently been revealed with the advent of new techniques allowing us to view DNA replication at the single cell and single DNA molecule levels. Normally in S phase, the progression of replication forks and their stability are regulated by the ATR-Claspin-Chk1 pathway. We recently showed that replication fork velocity varies across the human genome in normal and cancer cells, but that the velocity of a given fork is positively correlated with the distance between origins on the same DNA fiber. (19) Accordingly, in DNA replication-deficient Bloom's syndrome cells, reduced fork velocity is associated with an increased density of replication origins. (21) Replication elongation is also regulated in response to DNA damage. In human colon carcinoma cells treated with the topoisomerase I inhibitor camptothecin, DNA replication is inhibited both at the level of initiation and at the level of elongation through a Chk1-dependent checkpoint mechanism. (10) Together, these new findings demonstrate that replication fork velocity (fork progression) is coordinated with inter-origin distance and that it can be actively slowed down by Chk1-dependent mechanisms in response to DNA damage. Thus, we propose that the intra-S phase checkpoint consist of at least three elements: (1) stabilization of damaged replication forks; (2) suppression of firing of late origins; and (3) arrests of normal ongoing forks to prevent further DNA lesions by replication of a damaged DNA template.

Initiation of DNA replication occurs at origins of replication, traditionally defined by specific sequence elements. Sequence-dependent initiation of replication is the rule in prokaryotes and in the yeast Saccharomyces cereviseae. However, sequence-dependent initiation does not appear to be absolutely required in metazoan eukaryotes. Origin firing is instead likely dependent on stochastic initiation from chromatin-defined loci, despite the demonstration of some specific origins. Based on some recent observations in Xenopus laevis egg extracts and in mammalian cell culture, we propose that timing of origin firing is dependent on feedback from active replicons. This dynamic regulation of replication is mediated by sensing of ongoing replication by the DNA-damage checkpoint kinases ATM and ATR, which in turn downregulate neighboring and distal origins and replicons by inhibition of the S-phase kinases Cdk2 and Cdc7 and by inhibition of the replicative Mcm helicase. Origin selection, activation, and replicon progression are therefore constrained in both space and time via feedback from the cell cycle and ongoing replication.

Pol I is the most abundant polymerase in E. coli and plays an important role in short patch repair. In accord with this role in the cell, the purified polymerase exhibits low processivity and high fidelity in vitro. Pol I is also the polymerase responsible for leader strand synthesis during ColE1 plasmid replication. In a previous publication, we described the generation of a highly error-prone DNA polymerase I. Expression of this mutant Pol I results in errors during the replication of a ColE1 plasmid. The distribution and spectrum of mutations in the ColE1 plasmid sequence downstream the ori indicates that Pol I is capable of more processive replication in vivo than previously accepted. Here, we review evidence suggesting that Pol I may be recruited into a replisome-like holoenzyme and speculate that processive DNA replication by Pol I may play a role in recombination-dependent DNA replication in the cell.

In Xenopus early embryos, replication origins neither require specific DNA sequences nor is there an efficient S/M checkpoint, even though the whole genome (3 billion bases) is completely duplicated within 10-20 minutes. This leads to the "random-completion problem" of DNA replication in embryos, where one needs to find a mechanism that ensures complete, faithful, timely reproduction of the genome without any sequence dependence of replication origins. We analyze recent DNA replication data in Xenopus laevis egg extracts and find discrepancies with models where replication origins are distributed independently of chromatin structure. Motivated by these discrepancies, we have investigated the role that chromatin looping may play in DNA replication. We find that the loop-size distribution predicted from a wormlike-chain model of chromatin can account for the spatial distribution of replication origins in this system quantitatively. Together with earlier findings of increasing frequency of origin firings, our results can explain the random-completion problem. The agreement between experimental data (molecular combing) and theoretical predictions suggests that the intrinsic stiffness of chromatin loops plays a fundamental biological role in DNA replication in early-embryo Xenopus in regulating the origin spacing.

Eukaryotes employ redundant mechanisms to limit the replication of genomic DNA to only once per cycle. These mechanisms prevent DNA re-replication by restricting the assembly of the pre-replication complex to the cell cycle stages of late mitosis and G1 phase so that the re-initiation of DNA replication cannot occur during S phase. Here we discuss the conserved yet divergent mechanisms of replication control employed in yeast and metazoan species, including a perspective on the newly uncovered role of the CUL-4 ubiquitin ligase as a central regulator of DNA replication in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.

We describe here a model for sequential recruitment of various enzymatic systems that maintain DNA replication fidelity in cells with damaged bases, especially those formed by ultraviolet (UV) irradiation. Systems of increasing complexity but decreasing fidelity are recruited to restore replication of damaged DNA. The first and most accurate response is nucleotide excision repair (NER) that is cell cycle-independent; next come various delaying cell cycle checkpoints that provide an extended time window for NER. These delay the onset of the S phase at the G1/S boundary, and inhibit the initiation of individual replicating units (replicons and clusters of replicons) within the S phase. When checkpoints fail to operate completely, DNA replication forks must negotiate damage and the loss of coding information on the parental DNA strands. Replication can be resumed using bypass polymerases, or alternative bypass mechanisms. Finally, if all else fails, replication forks may degrade to double strand breaks and recombinational processes then allow their reconstruction. A network of signaling kinases modulates the efficiency of many damage responsive proteins to tailor their activities and subcellular localizations by phosphorylation and dephosphorylation.

Mammalian DNA replication is an elegantly choreographed process in which multiple components are assembled at the origins to form the prereplication complex. Formation and activation of the prereplication complex requires coordinate actions of G1and S phase cyclin-dependent kinases. Cyclin E-CDK2 and cyclin A-CDK2, together with DBF4-CDC7, phosphorylate several components of the prereplication complex and replication machinery. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of the mechanism of initiation of DNA replication in mammalian cells. The roles of cyclin A/E-CDK2 complexes in driving replication, their relationship with other regulators of S phase, and their role in keeping replication to only once per cell cycle will be discussed. In addition, an important issue is the checks and balances that prevent inappropriate DNA replication, and how a breakdown in these checkpoints can lead to genomic instability and cancer. A critical mediator of these checkpoints, ATM, signals through a comprehensive network of proteins leading to CDK2 inhibition thus preventing DNA synthesis. This will be reviewed in addition to other mechanisms involved in the intra-S phase DNA damage checkpoint.

During the G1 phase of the cell cycle, replication origins are prepared to fire, a process that is referred to as origin licensing. It was often pondered what a cell's fate would be if not all of its replication origins were licensed and subsequently activated during S phase. One obvious prediction was that S phase would simply be prolonged. As it turns out, however, the consequences are much more complex. A short G1 phase enforced by premature entry into S phase, or other events that negatively affect origin licensing, will ultimately compromise the cell's ability to complete DNA replication before entering mitosis. As a result, the cell becomes genomically unstable when it attempts to repair unreplicated DNA during anaphase. Thus, the density of active replication origins in the chromosomes of eukaryotic cells determines S phase dynamics and chromosome stability during mitosis.